Capistrano vs Puppet Bolt: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Capistrano and Puppet Bolt are both automation tools used for deployment and configuration management in IT environments.

1. **Architecture**: Capistrano is designed for deploying applications to one or more remote machines while Puppet Bolt is focused on orchestrating tasks across multiple nodes using both agentless and agent-based approaches.
   
2. **Configuration Management**: Puppet Bolt is specifically built for configuration management tasks and enforcing desired state configurations, while Capistrano primarily focuses on deployment and execution of scripts.
   
3. **Language Support**: Capistrano primarily utilizes Ruby for writing deployment recipes, while Puppet Bolt supports multiple languages such as YAML, Bash, and PowerShell for defining tasks.
   
4. **Agent Requirement**: Puppet Bolt can operate in an agentless mode, allowing it to manage systems without an agent installed, whereas Capistrano requires SSH access to target machines for deployment.
   
5. **Community Support**: Capistrano has been around longer and has a larger community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation and support, while Puppet Bolt, being a newer tool, is rapidly gaining popularity but may have a smaller support network.
   
6. **Target Audience**: Capistrano is well-suited for developers looking to automate their deployment processes, whereas Puppet Bolt is more tailored towards system administrators and DevOps engineers focused on configuration management tasks.

In Summary, Capistrano and Puppet Bolt have distinct differences in their architecture, focus on configuration management, language support, agent requirements, community support, and target audience.