Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bugzilla

87
124
+ 1
7
GitLab

60.9K
52.2K
+ 1
2.5K
Add tool

Bugzilla vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Bugzilla and GitLab

1. Integration

GitLab is primarily a code hosting and version control platform, providing a comprehensive set of DevOps functionality. It includes features such as issue tracking, continuous integration, and deployment pipelines in a single integrated platform. Bugzilla, on the other hand, is a dedicated bug tracking system with limited integration capabilities and lacks the built-in code repository management features provided by GitLab.

2. Collaboration

GitLab enables seamless collaboration among developers through features like code review, merge requests, and inline comments on code. This fosters better communication and collaboration in the development process. Bugzilla, on the other hand, primarily focuses on tracking and managing bugs, offering fewer collaboration features. It may require additional tools or platforms to facilitate effective collaboration among team members.

3. Workflow Automation

GitLab provides powerful workflow automation capabilities, allowing teams to define and enforce their development processes through customizable pipelines. This enables automatic testing, code quality checks, and deployment processes, enhancing efficiency and reducing human error. Bugzilla, although it supports basic workflows, does not offer the same level of automation as GitLab.

4. Scalability

GitLab is highly scalable and suitable for both small and large development teams. It can handle a large number of users, repositories, and projects simultaneously. Bugzilla, on the other hand, may face limitations in terms of scalability when dealing with a high volume of bugs or a large number of concurrent users.

5. Git Version Control

GitLab uses Git as its underlying version control system, which is widely adopted and provides advanced branching and merging capabilities. This allows developers to easily manage code changes, collaborate effectively, and track the history of code modifications. Bugzilla does not provide built-in version control support and relies on external version control systems, making it less convenient for developers.

6. Community and Support

GitLab has a large and active community of users, contributors, and documentation resources, providing a wealth of knowledge and support for users. This makes it easier to find solutions to problems and receive assistance when needed. Bugzilla, while still actively maintained, may have a smaller user base and limited community support in comparison.

In summary, GitLab offers a more comprehensive and integrated development platform with features like issue tracking, code hosting, collaboration, workflow automation, and version control, making it suitable for DevOps processes. Bugzilla, on the other hand, focuses primarily on bug tracking and may require additional tools for other development aspects.

Decisions about Bugzilla and GitLab
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 666.3K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Bugzilla
Pros of GitLab
  • 2
    Detailed
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 430
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
  • 137
    Includes many features, including ci
  • 113
    Nice UI
  • 84
    Good integration with gitlabci
  • 57
    Simple setup
  • 34
    Has an official mobile app
  • 34
    Free private repository
  • 31
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Open source, great ui (like github)
  • 18
    Slack Integration
  • 15
    Full CI flow
  • 11
    Free and unlimited private git repos
  • 10
    User, group, and project access management is simple
  • 9
    All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
  • 8
    Built-in CI
  • 8
    Intuitive UI
  • 6
    Full DevOps suite with Git
  • 6
    Both public and private Repositories
  • 5
    So easy to use
  • 5
    CI
  • 5
    Integrated Docker Registry
  • 5
    It's powerful source code management tool
  • 5
    Build/pipeline definition alongside code
  • 4
    Issue system
  • 4
    Dockerized
  • 4
    Unlimited free repos & collaborators
  • 4
    Security and Stable
  • 4
    On-premises
  • 4
    It's fully integrated
  • 4
    Mattermost Chat client
  • 4
    Excellent
  • 3
    Great for team collaboration
  • 3
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 3
    Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
  • 3
    I like the its runners and executors feature
  • 3
    Free private repos
  • 3
    Because is the best remote host for git repositories
  • 3
    Not Microsoft Owned
  • 3
    Opensource
  • 2
    Groups of groups
  • 2
    Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
  • 2
    Review Apps feature
  • 2
    Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
  • 2
    It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    HipChat intergration
  • 2
    Powerful Continuous Integration System
  • 2
    One-click install through DigitalOcean
  • 2
    The dashboard with deployed environments
  • 2
    Native CI
  • 2
    Many private repo
  • 2
    Kubernetes Integration
  • 2
    Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
  • 2
    Wounderful
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 1
    Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Bugzilla
Cons of GitLab
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 28
      Slow ui performance
    • 8
      Introduce breaking bugs every release
    • 6
      Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
    • 2
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 1
      Review Apps feature

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Bugzilla?

    Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

    What is GitLab?

    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Bugzilla and GitLab as a desired skillset
    What companies use Bugzilla?
    What companies use GitLab?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Bugzilla or GitLab.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Bugzilla?
    What tools integrate with GitLab?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Bugzilla and GitLab?
    Jira
    Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.
    Redmine
    Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.
    FogBugz
    FogBugz tracks bugs, issues, and customer support tickets through every stage of the development process. We built it to be quick and easy to use, so that your developers will actually use it. Over 20,000 teams from the world's best software companies use FogBugz because it keeps their developers productive and happy.
    Mantis
    It is a free web-based bug tracking system. It provides a delicate balance between simplicity and power. Users are able to get started in minutes and start managing their projects while collaborating with their teammates and clients effectively.
    Trac
    It is an open-source, Web-based project management and bug tracking system. It has been adopted by a variety of organizations for use as a bug tracking system for both free and open-source software and proprietary projects and products.
    See all alternatives