StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Live Reloading
  5. BrowserSync vs Docker Compose

BrowserSync vs Docker Compose

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserSync
BrowserSync
Stacks127
Followers140
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.3K
Forks754
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

BrowserSync vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?

  1. Installation and setup: BrowserSync is a development tool used for creating a local server that synchronizes changes across multiple devices. It requires installation via npm and configuring a simple JavaScript file. On the other hand, Docker Compose is a tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. It requires installing Docker on the host machine and creating a Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml file to define the services.

  2. Containerization: BrowserSync does not involve containerization as it simply sets up a local server for live reload purposes. In contrast, Docker Compose uses containerization to isolate applications and their dependencies within separate containers. This ensures consistency in development environments and simplifies deployment processes.

  3. Resource Management: BrowserSync primarily focuses on syncing files and live reloading web pages without managing resources at a granular level. Docker Compose, on the other hand, allows developers to define resource constraints, such as CPU and memory limits, for each container. This enables better resource utilization and prevents one container from monopolizing resources.

  4. Scalability: BrowserSync is suitable for small to medium-sized projects where live reloading is essential for development. However, Docker Compose is designed for orchestrating multi-container applications, making it more scalable for complex projects with multiple services. It allows developers to scale individual services independently based on requirements.

  5. Environment Isolation: BrowserSync operates within the host environment and does not provide full isolation for applications. Docker Compose, on the other hand, utilizes containerization to isolate applications and their dependencies. This isolation ensures that changes made to one container do not affect others, promoting consistency and reproducibility in different environments.

  6. Networking: BrowserSync creates a local server that can be accessed from various devices on the same network, making it convenient for testing on different devices simultaneously. Docker Compose configures networking between containers, allowing them to communicate with each other and define custom networks for better organization. This network isolation enhances security and simplifies communication between services.

In Summary, BrowserSync and Docker Compose differ in their installation methods, containerization approaches, resource management capabilities, scalability options, environment isolation levels, and networking configurations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

BrowserSync
BrowserSync
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

BrowserSync makes your tweaking and testing faster by synchronising file changes and interactions across multiple devices. It’s wicked-fast and totally free.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Interaction sync;File sync;URL history;Remote inspector;UI or CLI control;Build-tool compatible;URL tunneling;Free to run and reuse
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.3K
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
754
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
127
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
140
Followers
16.5K
Votes
0
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
Grunt
Grunt
gulp
gulp
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to BrowserSync, Docker Compose?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CodeKit

CodeKit

Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.

Prepros

Prepros

It is an interface tool which handles pre-processing, and other front-end tasks. Its greatest strength is the incredible ease with which it allows you to use pre-processors of various kinds, be they for CSS, HTML or JavaScript.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana