StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Browserify vs rollup

Browserify vs rollup

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Browserify
Browserify
Stacks2.2K
Followers414
Votes261
rollup
rollup
Stacks2.4K
Followers164
Votes17

Browserify vs rollup: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, JavaScript bundlers are essential for organizing and optimizing code. Two popular bundlers are Browserify and Rollup. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Module Resolution: Browserify primarily relies on the CommonJS module system, which is prevalent in Node.js applications. It uses the require() function to import and export modules. On the other hand, Rollup adopts the ES module system, leveraging the import and export statements. This system offers better tree-shaking capabilities, resulting in smaller bundle sizes.

  2. Tree Shaking: Rollup excels in tree shaking, which is the process of eliminating unused code from the final bundle. It can recognize dead code and remove it, resulting in smaller and more optimized bundles. Browserify, on the other hand, lacks built-in tree-shaking capabilities and may include unused code in the bundle.

  3. Code Splitting: Rollup provides built-in code splitting capabilities, allowing developers to split their code into smaller chunks that can be loaded on-demand. This feature is particularly useful for large applications with many modules. Browserify lacks native support for code splitting, which can result in larger initial bundle sizes.

  4. Configuration: Browserify utilizes a single configuration file, typically named package.json or browserify.js, to specify settings and options. In contrast, Rollup uses a dedicated configuration file, usually named rollup.config.js, where developers can define various options such as input and output files, plugins, and external dependencies.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: While both bundlers offer a wide range of plugins to extend functionality, the plugin ecosystem for Rollup is more extensive. Rollup's ecosystem includes various plugins for tasks like transpiling code, generating sourcemaps, and optimizing output. Browserify also has a significant number of plugins available, but the variety and community support might be slightly more limited.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: Rollup provides a more flexible and extensible architecture, allowing developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs. It offers a modular plugin system, making it easier to create and integrate custom plugins. Browserify, while still customizable, has a more opinionated approach and may require more workarounds for specific requirements.

In summary, Browserify and Rollup differ in their module resolution systems, tree-shaking capabilities, code splitting support, configuration approaches, plugin ecosystems, and customization options. While both bundlers serve the purpose of bundling JavaScript code, Rollup offers superior tree-shaking and code splitting features, while Browserify might be better suited for CommonJS-centric applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Browserify, rollup

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Browserify
Browserify
rollup
rollup

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Use a node-style require() to organize your browser code and load modules installed by npm.;browserify will recursively analyze all the require() calls in your app in order to build a bundle you can serve up to the browser in a single script tag.
-
Statistics
Stacks
2.2K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
414
Followers
164
Votes
261
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Node style browser code
  • 52
    Load modules installed by npm
  • 45
    Works great with gulp.js
  • 38
    NPM modules in the brower
  • 34
    Open source
Pros
  • 4
    Makes it easy to publish packages
  • 3
    Easier configuration
  • 2
    Better tree shaking
  • 2
    Provides smaller bundle size
  • 1
    Produces very clean code
Cons
  • 1
    Manual Chunking is a bit buggy
  • 1
    Almost everything needs to be a Plugin
  • 1
    No Loader like Webpack (need to use sjs or ESM imports)
  • 1
    No clear path for static assets

What are some alternatives to Browserify, rollup?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana