Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Browserify

1.8K
414
+ 1
261
RequireJS

8.8K
3.2K
+ 1
307
Add tool

Browserify vs RequireJS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Browserify and RequireJS are both JavaScript tools that allow developers to use the require() function to manage dependencies between JavaScript files. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between Browserify and RequireJS that make them distinct from each other.

  1. Bundle Size: One major difference between Browserify and RequireJS is how they handle bundling and file loading. Browserify bundles all required files into a single JavaScript file, resulting in a larger bundle size. On the other hand, RequireJS dynamically loads modules asynchronously, allowing for more granular control over file loading and potentially smaller bundle sizes.

  2. Dependencies: Browserify and RequireJS handle dependencies differently. Browserify assumes that all required modules are available on the client-side, while RequireJS can also handle modules that are loaded asynchronously, such as those that are fetched from a remote server. This makes RequireJS more flexible in terms of managing dependencies in different scenarios.

  3. Code Execution: RequireJS supports the usage of AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition) modules, which allows for non-blocking code execution. In contrast, Browserify uses CommonJS modules, which are synchronous by nature. This means that with RequireJS, modules can be loaded and executed asynchronously, resulting in potentially better performance and user experience in certain situations.

  4. Configuration: RequireJS requires a configuration file to specify module dependencies and paths. This configuration file can be customized to define specific module dependencies and their respective paths. On the other hand, Browserify does not require a separate configuration file, as it analyzes the dependencies based on the require() statements in the code.

  5. Integration: RequireJS is often used with AMD-compatible libraries and frameworks, as it aligns well with the overall asynchronous nature of these tools. Browserify, on the other hand, integrates more naturally with CommonJS libraries and frameworks, as it uses the CommonJS module format.

  6. Tooling and Ecosystem: RequireJS has a mature ecosystem and various tools and plugins built around it, making it easier to integrate with different build systems and development workflows. Browserify also has a substantial ecosystem, but it may not be as extensive as RequireJS in terms of available tools and plugins.

In summary, Browserify and RequireJS differ in their approach to bundling, handling dependencies, code execution, configuration, integration with libraries/frameworks, and tooling/ecosystem. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Browserify
Pros of RequireJS
  • 75
    Node style browser code
  • 52
    Load modules installed by npm
  • 45
    Works great with gulp.js
  • 38
    NPM modules in the brower
  • 34
    Open source
  • 16
    Node streams
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 79
    Open source
  • 69
    Modular script loader
  • 66
    Asynchronous
  • 49
    Great for AMD
  • 30
    Fast
  • 14
    Free

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Browserify?

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

What is RequireJS?

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Browserify and RequireJS as a desired skillset
What companies use Browserify?
What companies use RequireJS?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Browserify?
What tools integrate with RequireJS?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

JavaScriptGitGitHub+33
20
2121
What are some alternatives to Browserify and RequireJS?
Bower
Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.
Webpack
A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
Babel
Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.
rollup
It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.
Parcel
Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.
See all alternatives