StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Browserify-CDN vs Webpack

Browserify-CDN vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
Browserify-CDN
Browserify-CDN
Stacks6
Followers18
Votes0

Browserify-CDN vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown code is used to format text for use on websites. In this task, we will format the provided information as Markdown code and provide the key differences between Browserify-CDN and Webpack. We will be specific and ensure that each difference is in a single paragraph. Finally, we will summarize the main points in one line.

  1. Browserify-CDN: Browserify-CDN is a tool that allows developers to use modules written in the Node.js style in the browser without having to manually concatenate and bundle them. It works by using a content delivery network (CDN) to serve the JavaScript files, allowing them to be easily included in web pages. This makes it easier to manage dependencies and reuse code across different web projects.

  2. Webpack: Webpack is a module bundler that lets developers bundle JavaScript files for use in the browser. It works by creating a dependency graph of modules and then combining them into a single file (or multiple files) that can be included in a web page. Webpack offers more advanced features than Browserify-CDN, such as code splitting, lazy loading, and support for different module formats like ES modules and CommonJS.

  3. Key Difference 1: Dependency Management: Browserify-CDN relies on a content delivery network to serve JavaScript files, whereas Webpack handles dependency management internally. This means that with Browserify-CDN, developers can easily include external dependencies by simply including a script tag in their HTML, while with Webpack, dependencies need to be explicitly imported and configured in the Webpack configuration file.

  4. Key Difference 2: Bundle Size Optimization: Webpack offers more advanced bundle size optimization features compared to Browserify-CDN. It allows developers to split their code into multiple smaller bundles, which can be loaded asynchronously only when needed. This can significantly improve page load times, especially for large applications with many dependencies.

  5. Key Difference 3: Code Splitting: While both Browserify-CDN and Webpack allow developers to split their code into separate files, Webpack provides more flexibility and control over code splitting. With Webpack, developers can define split points in their code based on various conditions, such as different routes in a single-page application, and automatically generate separate bundles for each split point.

  6. Key Difference 4: Advanced Configuration Options: Webpack offers a more extensive and powerful configuration system compared to Browserify-CDN. Developers can customize various aspects of the bundling process, such as module resolution, file loaders, code transformations, and more. This allows for greater flexibility and fine-tuning of the bundling process to fit specific project requirements.

In Summary, Browserify-CDN is a tool that relies on a CDN for serving JavaScript files and provides simpler dependency management, while Webpack is a more advanced module bundler that offers features like bundle size optimization, code splitting, and advanced configuration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, Browserify-CDN

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
Browserify-CDN
Browserify-CDN

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Browsers don't have the require method defined, but Node.js does. With Browserify you can write code that uses require in the same way that you would use it in Node.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
6
Followers
28.1K
Followers
18
Votes
752
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Webpack, Browserify-CDN?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana