StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Browserify-CDN vs npm

Browserify-CDN vs npm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

npm
npm
Stacks137.4K
Followers82.2K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks3.0K
Browserify-CDN
Browserify-CDN
Stacks6
Followers18
Votes0

Browserify-CDN vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, two popular tools for managing JavaScript dependencies are Browserify-CDN and npm. While they both serve the purpose of managing dependencies, they have several key differences. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

1. Browserify-CDN: Browserify-CDN is a content delivery network (CDN) that allows developers to use packages from npm in the browser directly. It works by transforming npm packages into standalone JavaScript files that can be included in client-side scripts. This means that developers can easily include third-party libraries in their applications without having to install them locally.

2. npm: npm, short for Node Package Manager, is a package manager for JavaScript libraries and modules. It is primarily used for server-side development and provides a command-line interface for installing and managing packages. npm allows developers to specify dependencies in a package.json file, which includes information about the package itself, as well as its dependencies.

3. Dependency management: One key difference between Browserify-CDN and npm is how they handle dependency management. Browserify-CDN transforms npm packages into standalone JavaScript files that include all their dependencies. This means that developers don't have to worry about managing dependencies manually when using Browserify-CDN. On the other hand, npm relies on a package.json file to manage dependencies. Developers need to specify the dependencies in this file and run the npm install command to fetch and install the required packages.

4. Build process: Another key difference between Browserify-CDN and npm is the build process. With Browserify-CDN, the transformation of npm packages into standalone JavaScript files happens on-the-fly when the package is requested by the browser. This means that developers don't need to perform any build step before deploying their application. In contrast, npm requires a build step to be performed before the application can be deployed. This build step involves executing any necessary scripts defined in the package.json file and bundling the application's dependencies into a single file.

5. Environment compatibility: Browserify-CDN is designed specifically for browser environments and allows developers to include npm packages directly in their client-side scripts. This means that the packages used with Browserify-CDN should be compatible with the browser environment. On the other hand, npm is more flexible and can be used in a variety of environments, including server-side applications and command-line tools. npm packages can be used in both browser and non-browser environments.

6. Package updates: When using Browserify-CDN, developers have less control over package updates. Since the packages are transformed into standalone JavaScript files, any updates made to the original npm package will not automatically reflect in the Browserify-CDN version. To update a package, developers need to manually rebuild the package using Browserify-CDN. In contrast, npm provides a robust package update mechanism. Developers can simply run the npm update command to update all the packages listed in the package.json file.

In summary, Browserify-CDN allows developers to use npm packages directly in the browser, without requiring local installation or manual dependency management. However, it has limitations in terms of package updates and environment compatibility. On the other hand, npm provides a comprehensive package management solution for server-side development and offers more control over package updates and compatibility with different environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on npm, Browserify-CDN

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
Mark
Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

ReviewonReactReactTypeScriptTypeScriptYarnYarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm
npm
Browserify-CDN
Browserify-CDN

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Browsers don't have the require method defined, but Node.js does. With Browserify you can write code that uses require in the same way that you would use it in Node.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
137.4K
Stacks
6
Followers
82.2K
Followers
18
Votes
1.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 648
    Best package management system for javascript
  • 382
    Open-source
  • 327
    Great community
  • 148
    More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist
  • 112
    Nice people matter
Cons
  • 5
    Bad at package versioning and being deterministic
  • 5
    Problems with lockfiles
  • 3
    Node-gyp takes forever
  • 1
    Super slow
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to npm, Browserify-CDN?

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Verdaccio

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Duo

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Bundler

Bundler

It provides a consistent environment for Ruby projects by tracking and installing the exact gems and versions that are needed. It is an exit from dependency hell, and ensures that the gems you need are present in development, staging, and production.

Entropic

Entropic

It is a new package registry with a new CLI, designed to be easy to stand up inside your network. It features an entirely new file-centric API and a content-addressable storage system that attempts to minimize the amount of data you must retrieve over a network. This file-centric approach also applies to the publication API.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana