StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Rails Testing
  5. Bootsnap vs Rails Spring

Bootsnap vs Rails Spring

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails Spring
Rails Spring
Stacks593
Followers32
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.8K
Forks344
Bootsnap
Bootsnap
Stacks449
Followers26
Votes0

Bootsnap vs Rails Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bootsnap and Rails Spring are both tools used to improve the performance of Ruby on Rails applications by preloading code and reducing the startup time. However, there are key differences between the two that are worth noting.

  1. Installation: Bootsnap requires manual installation and configuration, while Rails Spring is integrated into the Rails framework by default, requiring no additional setup.

  2. Caching Mechanism: Bootsnap uses a cache to store precompiled code, allowing for faster subsequent requests. On the other hand, Rails Spring uses a different approach by preloading code in a separate process, which eliminates the need for cache storage.

  3. Load Time: Bootsnap focuses on improving the load time of the application by caching various code components, such as gems and YAML files. Rails Spring, on the other hand, aims to reduce the overall startup time of the Rails application by preloading code in a separate process during development.

  4. Compatibility: Bootsnap is compatible with all Ruby implementations, including MRI, JRuby, and Rubinius. Rails Spring is specifically designed for use with the MRI implementation of Ruby.

  5. Ease of Use: Bootsnap requires manual configuration, which may involve modifying the application's Gemfile and other configuration files. Rails Spring, on the other hand, seamlessly integrates into the Rails framework without any additional configuration steps.

  6. Development vs Production: Bootsnap is designed to improve the performance of an application in both development and production environments. Rails Spring, on the other hand, is primarily focused on speeding up the development process by reducing the time it takes to reload code.

In summary, Bootsnap and Rails Spring are both tools used to enhance the performance of Ruby on Rails applications. However, Bootsnap requires manual installation and configuration, uses a cache for code preloading, and is compatible with multiple Ruby implementations. Rails Spring, on the other hand, is integrated into Rails by default, preloads code in a separate process, specifically targets the MRI implementation, and primarily improves development speed.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rails Spring
Rails Spring
Bootsnap
Bootsnap

Spring is a Rails application preloader. It speeds up development by keeping your application running in the background so you don't need to boot it every time you run a test, rake task or migration.

Bootsnap is a library that plugs into a number of Ruby and (optionally) ActiveSupport and YAML methods to optimize and cache expensive computations.

Totally automatic; no need to explicitly start and stop the background process;Reloads your application code on each run;Restarts your application when configs / initializers / gem dependencies are changed;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
344
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
593
Stacks
449
Followers
32
Followers
26
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Rails
Rails
Ruby
Ruby
Rails
Rails

What are some alternatives to Rails Spring, Bootsnap?

Active Admin

Active Admin

Active Admin is a Ruby on Rails framework for creating elegant backends for website administration.

StimulusReflex

StimulusReflex

It is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails. It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast. It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love.

Turbolinks

Turbolinks

Turbolinks makes navigating your web application faster. Get the performance benefits of a single-page application without the added complexity of a client-side JavaScript framework. Use HTML to render your views on the server side and link

RubyGems

RubyGems

It is a package manager for the Ruby programming language that provides a standard format for distributing Ruby programs and libraries, a tool designed to easily manage the installation of gems, and a server for distributing them.

Docked Rails CLI

Docked Rails CLI

Setting up Rails for the first time with all the dependencies necessary can be daunting for beginners. Docked Rails CLI uses a Docker image to make it much easier, requiring only Docker to be installed.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp