Lettuce vs Behave

Overview

behave

Stacks67

Followers119

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.4K

Forks656

Lettuce

Stacks6

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks323

Behave vs Lettuce: What are the differences?

Lettuce and Behave are both popular testing frameworks used for different purposes in the software development process. Here are the key differences between Lettuce and Behave:

Purpose and Usage: Lettuce is a behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework for Python that allows developers to write acceptance tests in a human-readable format using Gherkin syntax. It is well-suited for testing application behavior from an end user's perspective and validating features based on user scenarios. On the other hand, Behave is also a BDD testing framework for Python, but it is more focused on automated testing of software features and functionalities. It enables developers to write test scenarios in Gherkin syntax, but its primary use case is to perform automated functional testing and regression testing.
Implementation and Integration: Lettuce works with any Python testing framework, such as unit test or nose, and integrates easily with existing test suites. It allows developers to write step definitions in Python, making it flexible and easy to use with various testing setups. In contrast, Behave uses Python's unit test framework by default and integrates seamlessly with it. This tight integration with unit tests provides more extensive test discovery and reporting features, making it an attractive choice for projects that rely heavily on unit test-based testing.
Reporting and Extensibility: Behave offers detailed and structured test reports, making it easy to identify failing tests and diagnose issues quickly. It provides various reporting formats, including plain text, JSON, and JUnit XML, making it suitable for integration with various CI/CD pipelines and test management tools. While Lettuce also provides reporting options and extensibility, its feature set in this regard may be more limited compared to Behave.
Community and Support: Behave may have a larger community due to its popularity as a general-purpose BDD framework in the Python ecosystem. As a result, users may find more resources, documentation, and community support for Behave.

In summary, Lettuce is more geared towards acceptance testing and facilitating collaboration between stakeholders, while Behave is optimized for automated functional testing and seamless integration with unit tests.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

behave	Lettuce
It is behaviour-driven development, Python style. It uses tests written in a natural language style, backed up by Python code.	It is a very simple BDD tool based on the Cucumber, which currently has many more features than Lettuce. It aims the most common tasks on BDD and it focus specially on those that make BDD so fun.
bdd; tests; tdd	Used as a command-line utility; Features, scenarios, and steps are python objects within lettuce’s feature engine; Language support; It features a number of built-in steps for Django to simplify the creation of fixtures
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.4K	GitHub Stars 1.3K
GitHub Forks 656	GitHub Forks 323
Stacks 67	Stacks 6
Followers 119	Followers 11
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Python Django Flask	Python Django

What are some alternatives to behave, Lettuce?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

Purpose and Usage: Lettuce is a behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework for Python that allows developers to write acceptance tests in a human-readable format using Gherkin syntax. It is well-suited for testing application behavior from an end user's perspective and validating features based on user scenarios. On the other hand, Behave is also a BDD testing framework for Python, but it is more focused on automated testing of software features and functionalities. It enables developers to write test scenarios in Gherkin syntax, but its primary use case is to perform automated functional testing and regression testing.
Implementation and Integration: Lettuce works with any Python testing framework, such as unit test or nose, and integrates easily with existing test suites. It allows developers to write step definitions in Python, making it flexible and easy to use with various testing setups. In contrast, Behave uses Python's unit test framework by default and integrates seamlessly with it. This tight integration with unit tests provides more extensive test discovery and reporting features, making it an attractive choice for projects that rely heavily on unit test-based testing.
Reporting and Extensibility: Behave offers detailed and structured test reports, making it easy to identify failing tests and diagnose issues quickly. It provides various reporting formats, including plain text, JSON, and JUnit XML, making it suitable for integration with various CI/CD pipelines and test management tools. While Lettuce also provides reporting options and extensibility, its feature set in this regard may be more limited compared to Behave.
Community and Support: Behave may have a larger community due to its popularity as a general-purpose BDD framework in the Python ecosystem. As a result, users may find more resources, documentation, and community support for Behave.

Lettuce vs Behave