StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Behat vs Cypress

Behat vs Cypress

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Behat
Behat
Stacks179
Followers65
Votes2
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks582
Cypress
Cypress
Stacks3.5K
Followers2.0K
Votes115
GitHub Stars49.4K
Forks3.4K

Behat vs Cypress: What are the differences?

Introduction

Behat and Cypress are both popular automated testing frameworks used for testing web applications. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Development Language: Behat is written in PHP, while Cypress is written in JavaScript. This means that developers familiar with PHP may find Behat easier to work with, while those with JavaScript knowledge may prefer Cypress.

  2. Test Execution: Behat follows a behavior-driven development (BDD) approach, where tests are written in a human-readable language called Gherkin. These tests are then executed sequentially. In contrast, Cypress uses a JavaScript-driven approach, where tests are written in JavaScript and executed in a real browser. This allows Cypress to simulate and interact with a web page more accurately.

  3. Cross-browser Testing: Behat supports cross-browser testing by utilizing Selenium WebDriver. This enables tests to run on multiple browsers, but it requires additional setup and configuration. Cypress, on the other hand, comes with its own built-in browser, which means tests can be executed on multiple browsers without any additional setup.

  4. Test Debugging: Cypress provides an interactive test runner that allows for easy debugging. Developers can pause and debug their tests in real-time, making it easier to identify and fix issues. Behat, however, does not offer the same level of interactive debugging capabilities, making it slightly more challenging to diagnose and fix problems.

  5. Test Stability: Cypress has built-in retries and automatic waiting, which helps in stabilizing tests against flaky or slow-loading elements. Behat does not have these built-in features, so developers need to manually implement waiting strategies and retries to ensure test stability.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Both Behat and Cypress have active and supportive communities. However, Cypress has gained significant popularity in recent years and has a larger ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and integrations. Behat, on the other hand, may have a smaller ecosystem but is still well-established and widely used in the PHP community.

In summary, the key differences between Behat and Cypress lie in their development language, test execution approach, cross-browser testing capabilities, test debugging features, test stability mechanisms, and the size of their respective communities and ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Behat, Cypress

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Behat
Behat
Cypress
Cypress

It is an open source Behavior-Driven Development framework for PHP. It is a tool to support you in delivering software that matters through continuous communication, deliberate discovery and test-automation.

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

-
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
49.4K
GitHub Forks
582
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
179
Stacks
3.5K
Followers
65
Followers
2.0K
Votes
2
Votes
115
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    BDD Acceptance Testing
  • 1
    Easy Ubiquitous language integration reusing code
Pros
  • 29
    Open source
  • 22
    Great documentation
  • 20
    Simple usage
  • 18
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross Browser testing
Cons
  • 21
    Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
  • 14
    Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
  • 12
    No iFrame support
  • 9
    No multiple domain support
  • 9
    No page object support

What are some alternatives to Behat, Cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana