StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine
  5. Azure Virtual Machines vs GraalVM

Azure Virtual Machines vs GraalVM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Virtual Machines
Azure Virtual Machines
Stacks87
Followers82
Votes7
GraalVM
GraalVM
Stacks70
Followers76
Votes0
GitHub Stars21.3K
Forks1.8K

Azure Virtual Machines vs GraalVM: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will explore the key differences between Azure Virtual Machines and GraalVM.

  1. Scalability: Azure Virtual Machines provide the flexibility to scale up or down based on the workload demands. It allows you to adjust the size and capacity of the virtual machines, making it suitable for handling varying workloads. On the other hand, GraalVM is a high-performance runtime that excels at running polyglot applications. It offers advanced optimizations and runtime components to enhance application performance.

  2. Virtualization Technology: Azure Virtual Machines are based on traditional virtualization technology, where a hypervisor is used to create and manage multiple virtual machines on a physical host. This enables the isolation and secure deployment of applications. GraalVM, however, uses a different approach by employing a universal virtual machine that supports multiple languages. It aims to provide a uniform runtime for different programming languages, enabling interoperability and seamless integration.

  3. Control and Management: Azure Virtual Machines are part of the Azure cloud platform and can be provisioned, managed, and monitored using Azure management tools, APIs, and services. It offers centralized control and management capabilities, including automated scaling and monitoring options. In contrast, GraalVM is a standalone runtime that can be installed and managed independently. While it provides certain tools and utilities for monitoring and diagnostics, it lacks the comprehensive management features offered by cloud-based platforms like Azure.

  4. Pricing and Billing: Azure Virtual Machines follow a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Users are billed based on the chosen virtual machine size, storage, and duration of usage. It offers flexibility in terms of cost optimization, with options to choose from various pricing tiers. On the other hand, GraalVM follows an open-source model and is freely available for developers to use and deploy. It does not have any specific pricing or billing mechanism associated with it.

  5. Ecosystem and Integrations: Azure Virtual Machines are part of the broader Azure ecosystem, which includes various other Azure services and integrations. This allows seamless integration with other Azure services such as Azure Storage, Azure Networking, and Azure Active Directory, enabling a comprehensive cloud solution. GraalVM, although it can be used in different deployment scenarios, does not have a dedicated ecosystem like Azure. However, it does provide compatibility with different programming languages and frameworks, enhancing its versatility.

  6. Use Cases: Azure Virtual Machines are widely used for various scenarios such as hosting applications, running legacy workloads, and providing a scalable infrastructure for different types of applications. It is suitable for enterprises looking for cloud-based virtualization solutions. On the other hand, GraalVM is specifically designed for running polyglot applications that require high-performance, interoperability, and efficient resource utilization. It is ideal for developers and organizations focusing on improving application performance and reducing language barriers.

Summary

In summary, Azure Virtual Machines offer scalability, traditional virtualization technology, comprehensive control and management capabilities, pay-as-you-go pricing, integration with the Azure ecosystem, and versatility for different use cases. On the other hand, GraalVM focuses on high-performance runtime, universal virtual machine concept, independent management, open-source availability, compatibility with multiple languages, and optimization for polyglot applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Virtual Machines
Azure Virtual Machines
GraalVM
GraalVM

You can create Linux and Windows virtual machines. It gives you the flexibility of virtualization for a wide range of computing solutions—development and testing, running applications, and extending your datacenter. It’s the freedom of open-source software configured the way you need it.

An ecosystem and shared runtime offering performance advantages not only to JVM-based languages such as Java, Scala, Groovy, and Kotlin, but also to programming languages as JavaScript, Ruby, Python, and R. Additionally, it enables the execution of native code on the JVM via LLVM front-end.

Keep your budget in check with low-cost, per-second billing. You only pay for the compute time you use; Scale from one to thousands of VM instances in minutes with VM Scale Sets; Encrypt sensitive data, protect VMs from malicious threats, secure network traffic, and meet regulatory and compliance requirements; Choose Linux or Windows. Deploy your own VM image or download images from the Azure Marketplace
Polyglot - Zero overhead interoperability between programming languages allows you to write polyglot applications and select the best language for your task; Native - Native images compiled with GraalVM ahead-of-time improve the startup time and reduce the memory footprint of JVM-based applications; Embeddable - GraalVM can be embedded in both managed and native applications. There are existing integrations into OpenJDK, Node.js, Oracle Database, and MySQL
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
21.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
87
Stacks
70
Followers
82
Followers
76
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Low Cost
  • 1
    Free Tier
  • 1
    Scalability
  • 1
    Auto Scale
  • 1
    Backed by Azure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Oracle
Oracle
MySQL
MySQL

What are some alternatives to Azure Virtual Machines, GraalVM?

HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)

HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)

HHVM uses a just-in-time (JIT) compilation approach to achieve superior performance while maintaining the flexibility that PHP developers are accustomed to. To date, HHVM (and its predecessor HPHPc before it) has realized over a 9x increase in web request throughput and over a 5x reduction in memory consumption for Facebook compared with the PHP 5.2 engine + APC.

Laravel Homestead

Laravel Homestead

Laravel Homestead is an official, pre-packaged Vagrant "box" that provides you a wonderful development environment without requiring you to install PHP, HHVM, a web server, and any other server software on your local machine. Homestead runs on any Windows, Mac, or Linux system, and includes the Nginx web server, PHP 5.6, MySQL, Postgres, Redis, Memcached, and all of the other goodies you need to develop amazing Laravel applications.

Hosting Provider THE.Hosting

Hosting Provider THE.Hosting

⚡️ THE.Hosting is the best hosting provider. ❇️ Ultra-fast server response time. Web hosting! ✅ Low cost VPS and dedicated servers. ☝ Tariffs on the website. ✅ support@THE.Hosting

Multipass

Multipass

It's a system that orchestrates the creation, management and maintenance of virtual machines and associated Ubuntu images to simplify development.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana