Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS IAM

1.2K
809
+ 1
26
Oathkeeper

4
14
+ 1
0
Add tool

AWS IAM vs Oathkeeper: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between AWS IAM and Oathkeeper

IAM (Identity and Access Management) on AWS is a service that helps manage user identities and their access to resources within the AWS platform. Unlike Oathkeeper, which is an open-source, cloud-native project that provides identity and access control for microservices and APIs. 

1. **Scope of Control**: AWS IAM is limited to managing access within the AWS cloud platform, while Oathkeeper can be used in a broader context, including hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Oathkeeper's flexibility allows organizations to centralize their access control policies across different cloud providers and on-premises systems. 

2. **Integration Flexibility**: AWS IAM is deeply integrated with various AWS services, providing seamless access control within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Oathkeeper is designed to be cloud provider agnostic, allowing it to integrate with multiple cloud providers and third-party services. This makes Oathkeeper more versatile in a diverse IT environment.

3. **Granularity of Policy Control**: While both AWS IAM and Oathkeeper offer policy-based access control, Oathkeeper provides finer-grained control over access policies at the API level. This granularity allows organizations to enforce specific access rules for individual APIs, enhancing security and compliance measures compared to AWS IAM.

4. **Authenticatio**n**: AWS IAM primarily relies on AWS's authentication mechanisms, such as access keys, IAM users, and roles. On the other hand, Oathkeeper supports various authentication methods, including OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and custom authentication solutions. This gives organizations more flexibility in implementing secure authentication mechanisms for their services.

5. **Community Support and Customization**: Oathkeeper being an open-source project benefits from a robust community that contributes to its development and maintenance. This community support allows for more customization options and the ability to address specific use cases that may not be natively supported by AWS IAM.

6. **Cost and Pricing Model**: AWS IAM is a managed service provided by AWS, and its pricing is based on usage and the number of users and roles created. In contrast, Oathkeeper being open-source, provides a cost-effective solution as organizations do not incur licensing fees or costs associated with proprietary software. This can result in significant cost savings for organizations, especially those with large-scale deployments.

In Summary, AWS IAM and Oathkeeper differ in scope, integration flexibility, granularity of policy control, authentication methods, community support, and cost implications.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS IAM
Pros of Oathkeeper
  • 23
    Centralized powerful permissions based access
  • 3
    Straightforward SSO integration
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of AWS IAM
    Cons of Oathkeeper
    • 1
      Cloud auth limited to resources, no apps or services
    • 1
      No equivalent for on-premise networks, must adapt to AD
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is AWS IAM?

      It enables you to manage access to AWS services and resources securely. Using IAM, you can create and manage AWS users and groups, and use permissions to allow and deny their access to AWS resources.

      What is Oathkeeper?

      A cloud native Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) which authenticates and authorizes incoming HTTP requests. Inspired by the BeyondCorp / Zero Trust white paper. Written in Go.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use AWS IAM?
      What companies use Oathkeeper?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using AWS IAM or Oathkeeper.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with AWS IAM?
        What tools integrate with Oathkeeper?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to AWS IAM and Oathkeeper?
        Azure Active Directory
        It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.
        Okta
        Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning.
        Auth0
        A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
        OAuth2
        It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.
        Teleport
        Teleport makes it easy for users to securely access infrastructure and meet the toughest compliance requirements. Teleport replaces shared credentials with short-lived certificates and is completely transparent to client-side tools.
        See all alternatives