AWS Device Farm vs Xamarin Test Cloud

Overview

Xamarin Test Cloud

Stacks44

Followers74

Votes3

AWS Device Farm

Stacks74

Followers180

Votes5

AWS Device Farm vs Xamarin Test Cloud: What are the differences?

1. Pricing Model: AWS Device Farm offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the device minutes used for testing. Xamarin Test Cloud, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model, where you pay a fixed monthly fee for a specific number of device minutes.
2. Supported Platforms: AWS Device Farm supports a wide range of platforms including Android, iOS, and web apps, while Xamarin Test Cloud primarily focuses on testing Android and iOS apps.
3. Device Inventory: AWS Device Farm allows you to select from a vast inventory of real physical devices for testing your application, providing a more realistic testing environment. Xamarin Test Cloud, on the other hand, uses virtual devices for testing, which may not accurately reflect real-world conditions.
4. Integration with CI/CD: AWS Device Farm seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD pipelines, such as Jenkins and Bamboo, allowing for automated testing as part of the continuous delivery pipeline. Xamarin Test Cloud also offers integration with CI/CD platforms but may require additional configuration and setup.
5. Reporting and Analysis: AWS Device Farm provides detailed test reports, including logs, screenshots, and performance data, allowing for comprehensive analysis and troubleshooting. Xamarin Test Cloud also provides test reports but may not offer the same level of detail and analysis.
6. Integration with AWS Services: AWS Device Farm offers seamless integration with other AWS services, such as CloudWatch and S3, allowing for easy storage and analysis of test results. Xamarin Test Cloud does not offer the same level of integration with AWS services.

In summary, AWS Device Farm and Xamarin Test Cloud differ in their pricing model, supported platforms, device inventory, integration with CI/CD pipelines, reporting capabilities, and integration with AWS services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Xamarin Test Cloud	AWS Device Farm
Run your app on our huge (and growing) collection of real devices from around the world. Select devices based on form factor, manufacturer, operating system, or even popularity in your target market. We’re adding over 100 devices every month, and if there’s a specific device you need, we’re taking requests.	Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.
Automate your app using real tools & languages.;Interact as users do.;Use any device feature.;Analyze app performance.;Test continuously.	Test on the same devices your customers use; Fix issues faster and delight your users; Simulate real-world environments; Choose the tests that work for you; Integrate with your development workflow; Test with confidence;
Statistics
Stacks 44	Stacks 74
Followers 74	Followers 180
Votes 3	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Integrated with Visual Studio, Xamarin Studio or CLI	Pros 3 1000 free minutes 2 Pay as you go pricing Cons 1 You need to remember to turn airplane mode off 1 Records all sessions, blocks on processing when done

What are some alternatives to Xamarin Test Cloud, AWS Device Farm?

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

BitBar

Testdroid provides a set of products for Android and iOS app/game testing on real devices. With different testing solutions, you can efficiently develop and test your mobile apps/games in agile way and achieve your business goals.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Gauge

Gauge is created by ThoughtWorks. Gauge let you write tests in plain-speak and refactor fearlessly. Gauge’s pluggable architecture allows you to customize your environment so you can write tests in the language and IDE of your choice.

Related Comparisons

AWS Device Farm vs Xamarin Test Cloud: What are the differences?

1. Pricing Model: AWS Device Farm offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the device minutes used for testing. Xamarin Test Cloud, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model, where you pay a fixed monthly fee for a specific number of device minutes.
2. Supported Platforms: AWS Device Farm supports a wide range of platforms including Android, iOS, and web apps, while Xamarin Test Cloud primarily focuses on testing Android and iOS apps.
3. Device Inventory: AWS Device Farm allows you to select from a vast inventory of real physical devices for testing your application, providing a more realistic testing environment. Xamarin Test Cloud, on the other hand, uses virtual devices for testing, which may not accurately reflect real-world conditions.
4. Integration with CI/CD: AWS Device Farm seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD pipelines, such as Jenkins and Bamboo, allowing for automated testing as part of the continuous delivery pipeline. Xamarin Test Cloud also offers integration with CI/CD platforms but may require additional configuration and setup.
5. Reporting and Analysis: AWS Device Farm provides detailed test reports, including logs, screenshots, and performance data, allowing for comprehensive analysis and troubleshooting. Xamarin Test Cloud also provides test reports but may not offer the same level of detail and analysis.
6. Integration with AWS Services: AWS Device Farm offers seamless integration with other AWS services, such as CloudWatch and S3, allowing for easy storage and analysis of test results. Xamarin Test Cloud does not offer the same level of integration with AWS services.

AWS Device Farm vs Xamarin Test Cloud

Overview