StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. AWS Data Pipeline vs Embulk

AWS Data Pipeline vs Embulk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Data Pipeline
AWS Data Pipeline
Stacks95
Followers398
Votes1
Embulk
Embulk
Stacks28
Followers26
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks202

AWS Data Pipeline vs Embulk: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS Data Pipeline and Embulk are both tools used for data integration and processing tasks. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture and Ecosystem: AWS Data Pipeline is a managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which offers a range of pre-built connectors for integrating various AWS services. It allows you to create complex workflows using a visual interface and provides scalability, reliability, and fault-tolerance. On the other hand, Embulk is an open-source data transfer tool that supports a wide variety of plugins and can connect to both cloud providers and on-premises databases. It provides a flexible and customizable approach to data integration.

  2. Flexibility and Customization: Embulk provides a high level of flexibility and customization options. Users have control over the entire data processing pipeline, including data extraction, transformation, and loading. With Embulk, you can write custom scripts and plugins to perform complex data operations based on your specific requirements. AWS Data Pipeline, on the other hand, provides a more declarative approach where users define the pipeline using pre-built activities and data transformations. While it offers a certain level of customization, it may not provide the same level of flexibility as Embulk.

  3. Connectivity and Integration: AWS Data Pipeline is tightly integrated with various AWS services, such as S3, EC2, Redshift, and EMR. It provides seamless connectivity and easy integration with these services, making it an ideal choice for users already using AWS infrastructure. Embulk, on the other hand, supports a wide range of connectors for different databases, cloud services, and file formats. It can be easily integrated with multiple data sources and destinations, including non-AWS services.

  4. Monitoring and Management: AWS Data Pipeline offers built-in monitoring and management capabilities. It provides visual representations of pipeline workflows, real-time metrics, and alerts for monitoring pipeline health and performance. It also allows users to schedule, start, stop, and rerun pipelines as needed. Embulk, on the other hand, requires additional monitoring and management setup. Users need to configure monitoring tools or integrate with third-party services to get similar visibility into pipeline performance and manageability.

  5. Cost and Pricing: The cost structure for AWS Data Pipeline is based on a pay-as-you-go model. Users are charged for the data processing resources used and the duration of their pipelines. Pricing is based on the number of pipeline runs, data volume, and the specific AWS services utilized in the pipeline. Embulk, being an open-source tool, is free to use. However, users may need to consider the cost of running infrastructure and resources required for data processing and storage while using Embulk.

  6. Community and Support: AWS Data Pipeline is backed by the extensive AWS community and support resources. It has comprehensive documentation, forums, and AWS support options available for assistance. Embulk, being an open-source tool, also has an active community and provides documentation, forums, and GitHub repositories for assistance. However, the level of community support and available resources may vary compared to the backing and scale of AWS Data Pipeline.

In summary, AWS Data Pipeline offers a managed service with pre-built integration and scalability features, while Embulk provides greater flexibility and customization options with a wide range of plugins and connectors. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements, existing infrastructure, and preferences of the users.

Detailed Comparison

AWS Data Pipeline
AWS Data Pipeline
Embulk
Embulk

AWS Data Pipeline is a web service that provides a simple management system for data-driven workflows. Using AWS Data Pipeline, you define a pipeline composed of the “data sources” that contain your data, the “activities” or business logic such as EMR jobs or SQL queries, and the “schedule” on which your business logic executes. For example, you could define a job that, every hour, runs an Amazon Elastic MapReduce (Amazon EMR)–based analysis on that hour’s Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) log data, loads the results into a relational database for future lookup, and then automatically sends you a daily summary email.

It is an open-source bulk data loader that helps data transfer between various databases, storages, file formats, and cloud services.

You can find (and use) a variety of popular AWS Data Pipeline tasks in the AWS Management Console’s template section.;Hourly analysis of Amazon S3‐based log data;Daily replication of AmazonDynamoDB data to Amazon S3;Periodic replication of on-premise JDBC database tables into RDS
Automatic guessing of input file formats; Parallel & distributed execution to deal with big data sets; Transaction control to guarantee All-or-Nothing; Resuming; Plugins released on RubyGems.org
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
202
Stacks
95
Stacks
28
Followers
398
Followers
26
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to create DAG and execute it
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
GitHub
GitHub
macOS
macOS
JSON
JSON

What are some alternatives to AWS Data Pipeline, Embulk?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope