AWS CodeCommit vs SVN (Subversion)

Overview

SVN (Subversion)

Stacks791

Followers629

Votes43

GitHub Stars614

Forks188

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks324

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS CodeCommit and SVN (Subversion) are version control systems that help developers manage and track changes to their codebase. While they serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between them.

Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit is fully integrated with AWS, making it seamless to work with other AWS services like AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild. On the other hand, SVN does not offer such deep integration with AWS services, requiring additional configurations and setup.
Scalability and Performance: CodeCommit provides scalability and high performance due to its cloud-based infrastructure. It can handle a large number of concurrent users and repositories with ease. In contrast, SVN may face limitations in scalability and performance, especially when dealing with a massive codebase or multiple teams.
Branching and Merging: CodeCommit offers advanced branching and merging capabilities, allowing developers to create branches, work on them individually, and merge them seamlessly. SVN also supports branching and merging but may require more manual efforts and steps, making it less efficient.
Access Control and Permissions: CodeCommit provides granular access control, allowing administrators to manage user permissions at various levels (repository, branch, file, etc.). SVN also supports access control, but CodeCommit's integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) makes it easier to manage access and permissions in a centralized manner.
Backup and Disaster Recovery: CodeCommit is a managed service provided by AWS, ensuring data backups and disaster recovery measures are in place. SVN, on the other hand, may require additional setup and precautions to ensure proper backup and disaster recovery.
Pricing and Cost Structure: CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the number of active repositories and data transfer. SVN, being an open-source system, does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, deploying SVN on a server and maintaining it may incur infrastructure and maintenance costs.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit offers deep integration with AWS services, scalability, advanced branching and merging capabilities, granular access control, backup and disaster recovery measures, and a pay-as-you-go pricing model. SVN, on the other hand, may require additional configurations, manual efforts for branching and merging, and additional setup for access control and backup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SVN (Subversion)	AWS CodeCommit
Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
-	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 614	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 188	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 791	Stacks 324
Followers 629	Followers 826
Votes 43	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 20 Easy to use 13 Simple code versioning 5 User/Access Management 3 Complicated code versionioning by Subversion 2 Free Cons 7 Branching and tagging use tons of disk space	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 No webhooks 2 NO LFS support
Integrations
No integrations available	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to SVN (Subversion), AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeCommit vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

Introduction:

Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit is fully integrated with AWS, making it seamless to work with other AWS services like AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild. On the other hand, SVN does not offer such deep integration with AWS services, requiring additional configurations and setup.
Scalability and Performance: CodeCommit provides scalability and high performance due to its cloud-based infrastructure. It can handle a large number of concurrent users and repositories with ease. In contrast, SVN may face limitations in scalability and performance, especially when dealing with a massive codebase or multiple teams.
Branching and Merging: CodeCommit offers advanced branching and merging capabilities, allowing developers to create branches, work on them individually, and merge them seamlessly. SVN also supports branching and merging but may require more manual efforts and steps, making it less efficient.
Access Control and Permissions: CodeCommit provides granular access control, allowing administrators to manage user permissions at various levels (repository, branch, file, etc.). SVN also supports access control, but CodeCommit's integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) makes it easier to manage access and permissions in a centralized manner.
Backup and Disaster Recovery: CodeCommit is a managed service provided by AWS, ensuring data backups and disaster recovery measures are in place. SVN, on the other hand, may require additional setup and precautions to ensure proper backup and disaster recovery.
Pricing and Cost Structure: CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the number of active repositories and data transfer. SVN, being an open-source system, does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, deploying SVN on a server and maintaining it may incur infrastructure and maintenance costs.

AWS CodeCommit vs SVN (Subversion)

Overview