AWS CodeCommit vs npm

Overview

npm

Stacks137.4K

Followers82.2K

Votes1.6K

GitHub Stars17.6K

Forks3.0K

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks324

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between AWS CodeCommit and npm.

Service Purpose: AWS CodeCommit is a source control service that allows users to privately store and manage Git repositories, securely integrating with other AWS services. On the other hand, npm is a package manager used for JavaScript programming language, facilitating the installation and management of dependencies and packages for Node.js projects.
Focus on Version Control vs Dependency Management: AWS CodeCommit primarily focuses on version control, enabling teams to collaborate and manage code changes effectively, with features like branching, merging, and pull requests. In contrast, npm is centered on dependency management, providing easy access to libraries and packages for developers to incorporate into their projects.
Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeDeploy, enabling a streamlined CI/CD pipeline for developers. npm, on the other hand, is not inherently integrated with AWS services but can be utilized within various development environments.
Access Control and Security Features: AWS CodeCommit offers robust access control mechanisms, allowing users to define fine-grained permissions for repository access, authentication, and encryption of data at rest. npm, while providing some security features, does not offer the same level of built-in access control and encryption options as AWS CodeCommit.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users are charged based on repository storage and data transfer. In comparison, npm operates on a freemium model, with a free tier for public packages and a paid subscription for additional features and private package hosting.
Community and Ecosystem: npm boasts a vast community of developers and a rich ecosystem of packages, making it a popular choice for JavaScript developers looking to leverage existing libraries. In contrast, AWS CodeCommit is more specialized for teams working within the AWS cloud environment, focusing on secure version control and collaboration within that ecosystem.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and npm differ in service purpose, focus, integration, access control, pricing model, and community ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on npm, AWS CodeCommit

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

Reviewon

React

TypeScript

Yarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm	AWS CodeCommit
npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
-	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 17.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 137.4K	Stacks 324
Followers 82.2K	Followers 826
Votes 1.6K	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 648 Best package management system for javascript 382 Open-source 327 Great community 148 More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist 112 Nice people matter Cons 5 Problems with lockfiles 5 Bad at package versioning and being deterministic 3 Node-gyp takes forever 1 Super slow	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 No webhooks 2 No fork
Integrations
No integrations available	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to npm, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeCommit vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between AWS CodeCommit and npm.

Service Purpose: AWS CodeCommit is a source control service that allows users to privately store and manage Git repositories, securely integrating with other AWS services. On the other hand, npm is a package manager used for JavaScript programming language, facilitating the installation and management of dependencies and packages for Node.js projects.
Focus on Version Control vs Dependency Management: AWS CodeCommit primarily focuses on version control, enabling teams to collaborate and manage code changes effectively, with features like branching, merging, and pull requests. In contrast, npm is centered on dependency management, providing easy access to libraries and packages for developers to incorporate into their projects.
Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeDeploy, enabling a streamlined CI/CD pipeline for developers. npm, on the other hand, is not inherently integrated with AWS services but can be utilized within various development environments.
Access Control and Security Features: AWS CodeCommit offers robust access control mechanisms, allowing users to define fine-grained permissions for repository access, authentication, and encryption of data at rest. npm, while providing some security features, does not offer the same level of built-in access control and encryption options as AWS CodeCommit.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users are charged based on repository storage and data transfer. In comparison, npm operates on a freemium model, with a free tier for public packages and a paid subscription for additional features and private package hosting.
Community and Ecosystem: npm boasts a vast community of developers and a rich ecosystem of packages, making it a popular choice for JavaScript developers looking to leverage existing libraries. In contrast, AWS CodeCommit is more specialized for teams working within the AWS cloud environment, focusing on secure version control and collaboration within that ecosystem.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and npm differ in service purpose, focus, integration, access control, pricing model, and community ecosystem.

AWS CodeCommit vs npm

Overview