AWS CodeCommit vs Google Cloud Source Repositories: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeCommit and Google Cloud Source Repositories

AWS CodeCommit and Google Cloud Source Repositories are both version control services that provide managed Git repositories for developers to securely store and manage their code. However, there are several key differences between these two services.

1. Hosting platform: AWS CodeCommit is a service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Google Cloud Source Repositories is a service provided by Google Cloud Platform (GCP). This means that CodeCommit is hosted on AWS infrastructure, while Source Repositories is hosted on GCP infrastructure.

2. Integration with other services: CodeCommit integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, such as AWS CodePipeline for continuous delivery and AWS CodeBuild for building and testing code. On the other hand, Source Repositories integrates with other GCP services, such as Google Cloud Functions for serverless computing and Google Cloud Build for building, testing, and deploying code.

3. Pricing model: CodeCommit offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the resources you use. It also includes a free tier for the first five active users per month. Source Repositories, on the other hand, offers a different pricing model based on storage and data transfer, and it also includes a free tier for a certain amount of storage and commits per month.

4. Access control: CodeCommit provides fine-grained access control through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), allowing you to set granular permissions for users and groups. Source Repositories, on the other hand, uses Google Cloud IAM for access control, which also provides fine-grained permissions based on roles and access levels.

5. Code review capabilities: CodeCommit offers built-in code review capabilities, allowing developers to collaborate and review code changes before merging them into the main branch. Source Repositories, on the other hand, does not have built-in code review capabilities, but it can integrate with external code review tools like Gerrit for code review workflows.

6. Geographical availability: CodeCommit is available in multiple AWS regions globally, allowing you to choose the region that is closest to your users and provides the lowest latency. Source Repositories, on the other hand, is available in fewer regions compared to CodeCommit, as it is limited to the regions where GCP services are available.

In summary, AWS CodeCommit and Google Cloud Source Repositories differ in terms of hosting platform, integration with other services, pricing model, access control, code review capabilities, and geographical availability.