Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Amplify

492
548
+ 1
15
Netlify

3.4K
2K
+ 1
206
Add tool

AWS Amplify vs Netlify: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS Amplify and Netlify are two popular web development platforms used to deploy and manage web applications. While they both offer similar functionalities, there are key differences between them that developers need to consider before choosing one for their project. The following paragraphs highlight six key differences between AWS Amplify and Netlify.

  1. Pricing Model: One of the major differences between AWS Amplify and Netlify is their pricing model. AWS Amplify has a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users are billed based on the actual usage of resources. On the other hand, Netlify offers both free and paid plans, with the free plan being suitable for small-scale projects and the paid plans offering additional features and higher resource limits.

  2. Integration with AWS Services: AWS Amplify is tightly integrated with other AWS services, such as AWS Lambda, AWS AppSync, and Amazon DynamoDB. This integration allows developers to build scalable and robust applications using a wide range of AWS services. In contrast, Netlify primarily focuses on web hosting and deployment and does not offer the same level of integration with other AWS services.

  3. Serverless Functionality: AWS Amplify provides built-in support for serverless functions, allowing developers to easily create and deploy serverless backend logic. This serverless functionality enables developers to build scalable and event-driven architectures without having to manage servers. Netlify, on the other hand, does not offer native support for serverless functions, although it does provide integrations with services like AWS Lambda and Azure Functions.

  4. Continuous Deployment: Netlify is well-known for its seamless and automated continuous deployment workflow. It automatically deploys changes to the web application whenever changes are pushed to the repository, making it easier for developers to iterate and deploy updates. While AWS Amplify also supports continuous deployment, it requires additional configuration and setup compared to Netlify's out-of-the-box solution.

  5. Scalability and Performance: AWS Amplify leverages the scalability and global infrastructure of AWS, allowing applications to handle high traffic loads and ensuring low latency for users across different regions. Netlify also provides a global CDN (Content Delivery Network) for improved performance, but it may not scale as seamlessly as AWS Amplify when handling larger workloads or complex applications.

  6. Database and Backend Services: AWS Amplify offers a wide range of managed database and backend services, such as Amazon Aurora, Amazon DynamoDB, and Amazon Cognito. These services simplify the development and management of databases and authentication systems. In comparison, Netlify primarily focuses on static website hosting and does not provide built-in database or backend services.

In summary, AWS Amplify provides a more comprehensive suite of services and stronger integration with other AWS services, making it suitable for complex applications that require scalable infrastructure and advanced functionalities. Netlify, on the other hand, offers a simplified and streamlined workflow for web hosting and deployment and may be more suitable for smaller projects or developers who prefer simplicity.

Decisions about AWS Amplify and Netlify
Howie Zhao
Full Stack Engineer at yintrust · | 7 upvotes · 227K views

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of AWS Amplify
Pros of Netlify
  • 5
    GraphQL
  • 3
    Better with Relations and Security
  • 2
    Flexible Auth options
  • 2
    Cheaper
  • 1
    Backed by Amazon
  • 1
    Config free environment variables
  • 1
    Continuous deployment
  • 0
    Jije
  • 46
    Easy deploy
  • 43
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 22
    Free SSL support
  • 22
    Super simple deploys
  • 15
    Easy Setup and Continous deployments
  • 10
    Faster than any other option in the market
  • 10
    Free plan for personal websites
  • 8
    Deploy previews
  • 6
    Free Open Source (Pro) plan
  • 4
    Easy to use and great support
  • 4
    Analytics
  • 4
    Great loop-in material on a blog
  • 3
    Custom domains support
  • 3
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 3
    Great drag and drop functionality
  • 1
    Canary Releases (Split Tests)
  • 1
    Supports static site generators
  • 1
    Tech oriented support
  • 0
    Django

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS Amplify
Cons of Netlify
  • 2
    Free tier is limited
  • 1
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 7
    It's expensive
  • 1
    Bandwidth limitation

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is AWS Amplify?

A JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends.

What is Netlify?

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use AWS Amplify?
What companies use Netlify?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS Amplify?
What tools integrate with Netlify?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to AWS Amplify and Netlify?
Firebase
Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
AWS Mobile Hub
AWS Mobile Hub is the fastest way to build mobile apps powered by AWS. It lets you easily add and configure features for your apps, including user authentication, data storage, backend logic, push notifications, content delivery, and analytics. After you build your app, AWS Mobile Hub gives you easy access to testing on real devices, as well as analytics dashboards to track usage of your app – all from a single, integrated console.
Beanstalk
A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.
Serverless
Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.
Realm
The Realm Mobile Platform is a next-generation data layer for applications. Realm is reactive, concurrent, and lightweight, allowing you to work with live, native objects.
See all alternatives