StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Prototyping
  4. Mobile Prototyping Interaction Design Tools
  5. Avocado vs pytest

Avocado vs pytest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Avocado
Avocado
Stacks27
Followers18
Votes0
pytest
pytest
Stacks4.0K
Followers306
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks2.9K

Avocado vs pytest: What are the differences?

Key differences between Avocado and pytest

Avocado and pytest are two popular testing frameworks used for testing software applications. While both frameworks serve the purpose of automated testing, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Test Interfaces: Avocado provides a simple and easy-to-use command-line interface, allowing developers to run tests using various options and filters. On the other hand, pytest offers a rich set of command-line options and also allows tests to be written as regular Python functions, making it more flexible and customizable.

  2. Fixture System: Avocado uses a custom fixture system that allows tests to define and use fixtures, which provide setup and teardown functionality for test cases. This fixture system is based on the concept of plugins and provides a way to share fixtures across multiple test cases. On the contrary, pytest offers a powerful built-in fixture system that simplifies setup and teardown operations by providing automatic management of test-specific resources.

  3. Test Discovery: Avocado uses a hierarchical test suite organization, where tests are defined in YAML files and grouped into test suites. The test runner then executes the test suites based on their configuration. In contrast, pytest uses a flexible test discovery mechanism that automatically discovers test modules and functions based on predefined naming conventions, making it easy to add and organize tests without much configuration.

  4. Test Execution: Avocado runs tests in a separate process using a test runner, which provides features like parallel test execution and test case result tracking. This helps in improving the overall test execution speed. On the other hand, pytest executes tests in the same process, making it faster and more efficient for smaller test suites.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: Avocado has a limited number of plugins available compared to pytest. However, it provides a simple plugin framework that allows developers to extend its functionality by creating custom plugins. pytest, on the other hand, has a rich ecosystem of plugins, which provide additional features and integrations with various third-party tools and libraries.

  6. Community Support: pytest has a larger and more active community compared to Avocado. This means there are more resources, tutorials, and support available for pytest, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot any issues they encounter.

In summary, Avocado and pytest are both powerful testing frameworks, but they differ in terms of test interfaces, fixture systems, test discovery mechanisms, test execution approaches, plugin ecosystems, and community support. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the most suitable framework for their testing needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Avocado
Avocado
pytest
pytest

Avocado is an open source interaction design toolbox built by​ IDEO.​ It ​enables designers to make quick interactive prototypes without writing a line of code.​ ​Built on top of Facebook's Origami framework, Avocado provides ready-to-use patches that can be easily combined to create fully-customized prototypes.​ Official announcement: http://labs.ideo.com/2014/05/27/avocado/

A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool.

Carousel, creates a swipeable carousel of images.;Bistable, makes an element snap to two positions.;Master Detail, creates a Master-Detail relationship between two views;Flip, creates a card that can be flipped back and forth;Hit Grid, creates a grid of Hit Areas. To retrieve which element has been clicked use Hit Grid Info;iOS Keyboard, provides an interactive keyboard. To retrieve the text being typed use iOS Keyboard Info
Auto-discovery; Modular fixtures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.9K
Stacks
27
Stacks
4.0K
Followers
18
Followers
306
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
PyCharm
PyCharm

What are some alternatives to Avocado, pytest?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Framer

Framer

Framer is a JavaScript framework that makes creating realistic prototypes a breeze – complete with filters, spring physics and full 3D effects. Framer Generator is a desktop app that imports the resources and folder hierarchy from Photoshop files (Sketch coming soon). Import your design and immediately start to add interaction and animation.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

ProtoPie

ProtoPie

It is the easiest tool used to turn your UI/UX design ideas into highly interactive prototypes for mobile, desktop, web, all the way to IoT. ProtoPie runs on macOS & Windows and the player app is on iOS and Android.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp