Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AVA

110
204
+ 1
32
Jest

9.2K
3.8K
+ 1
175
Mocha

8.5K
2.8K
+ 1
430

AVA vs Jest vs Mocha: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown is a lightweight markup language used to format text that can be easily converted into HTML for displaying on websites. In this task, we will format the content as Markdown code and provide key differences between AVA, Jest, and Mocha, which are popular JavaScript testing frameworks.

  1. Test Runner: AVA is a concurrent test runner, meaning it runs test files simultaneously, reducing the overall execution time. On the other hand, Jest and Mocha both run tests sequentially, executing one test file at a time.

  2. Mocking and Spying: Jest provides built-in mocking and spying functionality, making it easier to create mocks and spies for testing purposes. Although Mocha also has some libraries that offer similar functionality, it lacks native support for these features. AVA, too, does not have built-in mocking and spying capabilities.

  3. Configurability: Mocha provides extensive configurability options, allowing developers to customize the testing environment according to their needs. Jest also offers a good level of configurability with a wide range of configuration options. In contrast, AVA, although flexible, has a more opinionated and minimalistic configuration approach.

  4. Parallel Test Execution: AVA allows tests to run in parallel by default, utilizing the full potential of modern multi-core systems. Jest, while it does support parallel execution, requires additional configuration to operate in parallel effectively. Mocha, on the other hand, executes tests sequentially and does not have built-in support for parallel execution.

  5. Assertion Library: Jest comes with its own assertion library, which provides a wide range of built-in matchers for making assertions in tests. Mocha does not have an assertion library by default but can be combined with libraries like Chai or Should.js to achieve the same functionality. AVA, similar to Mocha, does not include an assertion library but can be used with third-party libraries like Chai or Power Assert.

  6. Test Watcher: When running tests, Jest includes a built-in watch mode that automatically reruns tests whenever changes are detected, making it convenient during development. Mocha and AVA, on the other hand, do not have a built-in test watcher, requiring the use of additional tools like nodemon or chokidar.

In summary, AVA differentiates itself by providing concurrent test execution, but lacks built-in mocking and spying support. Jest offers extensive mocking and spying capabilities with a wide range of configuration options, along with a built-in assertion library. Mocha, a highly configurable testing framework, lacks features like native mocking and spying support and parallel test execution.

Decisions about AVA, Jest, and Mocha
Shared insights
on
CypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

See more

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

See more

We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AVA
Pros of Jest
Pros of Mocha
  • 12
    Simple and fast
  • 6
    Parallel test running
  • 5
    Open source
  • 3
    Promise support
  • 3
    Test code Instrumenting
  • 2
    Babel integration
  • 1
    ESM Ready
  • 36
    Open source
  • 32
    Mock by default makes testing much simpler
  • 23
    Testing React Native Apps
  • 20
    Parallel test running
  • 16
    Fast
  • 13
    Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing
  • 8
    Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests
  • 7
    Out of the box code coverage
  • 7
    Promise support
  • 6
    One stop shop for unit testing
  • 3
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Assert Library Included
  • 1
    Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu
  • 1
    Preset support
  • 0
    Can be used for BDD
  • 0
    Karma
  • 137
    Open source
  • 102
    Simple
  • 81
    Promise support
  • 48
    Flexible
  • 29
    Easy to add support for Generators
  • 12
    For browser and server testing
  • 7
    Curstom assertion libraries
  • 5
    Works with Karma
  • 3
    No other better tools
  • 1
    Simple setup
  • 1
    Works with saucelabs
  • 1
    Lots of tutorials and help online
  • 1
    Default reporter is nice, clean, and itemized
  • 1
    Works with BrowserStack
  • 1
    Simple integration testing

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AVA
Cons of Jest
Cons of Mocha
  • 1
    No built-in support for DOM
  • 1
    No source files compilation
  • 4
    Documentation
  • 4
    Ambiguous configuration
  • 3
    Difficult
  • 2
    Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
  • 2
    Multiple error messages for same error
  • 2
    Difficult to run single test/describe/file
  • 2
    Ambiguous
  • 2
    Bugged
  • 1
    BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail
  • 1
    Slow
  • 1
    Reporter is too general
  • 1
    Unstable
  • 1
    Bad docs
  • 1
    Still does't support .mjs files natively
  • 1
    Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests
  • 0
    Interaction with watch mode on terminal
  • 3
    Cannot test a promisified functions without assertion
  • 2
    No assertion count in results
  • 1
    Not as many reporter options as Jest

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is AVA?

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

What is Jest?

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

What is Mocha?

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use AVA?
What companies use Jest?
What companies use Mocha?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AVA?
What tools integrate with Jest?
What tools integrate with Mocha?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+29
    14
    13421
    JavaScriptGitHubGit+33
    20
    2084
    What are some alternatives to AVA, Jest, and Mocha?
    EVA
    Equipping you with hundreds of symbols and dozens or styles configurations, it makes sure the design stays consistent across all of your applications and platforms.
    Chai
    It is a BDD / TDD assertion library for node and the browser that can be delightfully paired with any javascript testing framework. It has several interfaces that allow the developer to choose the most comfortable. The chain-capable BDD styles provide an expressive language & readable style, while the TDD assert style provides a more classical feel.
    Jasmine
    Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
    Cypress
    Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
    SinonJS
    It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js.
    See all alternatives