AVA vs Jasmine: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown provides key differences between AVA and Jasmine.

1. **Testing Framework Type**: AVA is a test runner while Jasmine is a behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework. AVA focuses on running the tests in parallel for faster execution, while Jasmine provides a descriptive language for writing test cases.
2. **Syntax Style**: AVA uses modern syntax such as ES6, async/await, and Arrow functions, making it more suitable for developers familiar with the latest JavaScript features. In contrast, Jasmine uses a more traditional syntax which may appeal to developers who prefer a simpler approach.
3. **Configuration Options**: AVA requires less configuration as it comes with built-in assertion library and has minimalistic setup. On the other hand, Jasmine provides more configuration options and flexibility in terms of customization and setup, allowing users to tailor their testing environments.
4. **Community Support**: Jasmine has been around longer and has a larger community support base with extensive documentation and resources available. AVA, being a newer tool, may have a smaller community but is known for its responsive and active support from developers and contributors.
5. **Test Execution Speed**: Due to its parallel test execution capability, AVA usually runs tests faster compared to Jasmine, which runs tests sequentially. This difference in speed can be significant when dealing with larger test suites.
6. **Test Runner Integration**: AVA can be easily integrated with various test runners and libraries, providing compatibility with different ecosystems. In contrast, Jasmine is more standalone and may require additional effort for integration with other tools or platforms.

In Summary, AVA and Jasmine differ in terms of their testing framework type, syntax style, configuration options, community support, test execution speed, and test runner integration.