StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. Apache Aurora vs OpenStack

Apache Aurora vs OpenStack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora
Stacks69
Followers96
Votes0

Apache Aurora vs OpenStack: What are the differences?

Apache Aurora vs. OpenStack

Apache Aurora and OpenStack are both popular open-source cloud computing platforms, but they have key differences that set them apart. Below are the main distinctions between the two technologies.

1. **Resource Allocation and Management**: Apache Aurora focuses on managing and allocating resources efficiently for long-running services, while OpenStack provides a more comprehensive set of services for managing entire data center infrastructure, including compute, storage, and networking resources.

2. **Scheduling Mechanism**: Apache Aurora utilizes a more lightweight and flexible task scheduling mechanism compared to OpenStack, which has a more complex and interdependent scheduling system that covers various components of the cloud infrastructure.

3. **Scaling and Elasticity**: OpenStack is designed to scale horizontally across a large number of physical servers and support elastic resource provisioning, whereas Apache Aurora is optimized for running large volumes of stateless microservices with high efficiency and minimal resource wastage.

4. **Community Support and Ecosystem**: While both Apache Aurora and OpenStack have active developer communities, OpenStack has a larger and more diverse ecosystem of tools, plugins, and integrations due to its broader scope of functionalities beyond just task scheduling and resource management.

In Summary, Apache Aurora offers efficient resource allocation and lightweight task scheduling for long-running services, whereas OpenStack provides a comprehensive infrastructure management solution with a larger ecosystem and scalability options. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

Apache Aurora is a service scheduler that runs on top of Mesos, enabling you to run long-running services that take advantage of Mesos' scalability, fault-tolerance, and resource isolation.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
Deployment and scheduling of jobs;The abstraction a “job” to bundle and manage Mesos tasks;A rich DSL to define services;Health checking;Failure domain diversity;Instant provisioning
Statistics
Stacks
790
Stacks
69
Followers
1.2K
Followers
96
Votes
138
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Vagrant
Vagrant

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, Apache Aurora?

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Nomad

Nomad

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

DC/OS

DC/OS

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

Mesosphere

Mesosphere

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

VirtKick

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Gardener

Gardener

Many Open Source tools exist which help in creating and updating single Kubernetes clusters. However, the more clusters you need the harder it becomes to operate, monitor, manage and keep all of them alive and up-to-date. And that is exactly what project Gardener focuses on.

YARN Hadoop

YARN Hadoop

Its fundamental idea is to split up the functionalities of resource management and job scheduling/monitoring into separate daemons. The idea is to have a global ResourceManager (RM) and per-application ApplicationMaster (AM).

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

kops

kops

It helps you create, destroy, upgrade and maintain production-grade, highly available, Kubernetes clusters from the command line. AWS (Amazon Web Services) is currently officially supported, with GCE in beta support , and VMware vSphere in alpha, and other platforms planned.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana