StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Infrastructure Build Tools
  5. Atlas vs Pulumi

Atlas vs Pulumi

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atlas
Atlas
Stacks33
Followers125
Votes0
Pulumi
Pulumi
Stacks306
Followers293
Votes25
GitHub Stars24.1K
Forks1.3K

Atlas vs Pulumi: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Below are the key differences between Atlas and Pulumi:

1. **Hosting Environment**:
Atlas is a cloud-based platform that provides infrastructure automation, version control, and collaboration features, while Pulumi allows users to define and manage cloud infrastructure using code as well as enabling integration with various cloud providers.
   
2. **Language Support**:
Atlas primarily supports Terraform configuration language for defining infrastructure, whereas Pulumi supports multiple programming languages such as TypeScript, Python, Go, and .NET for infrastructure as code alongside Terraform DSL.
   
3. **Workflow Automation**:
In Atlas, users can leverage integrations with version control systems like GitHub and GitLab for automated deployment workflows, while Pulumi provides a flexible workflow automation process by allowing custom scripting and CI/CD pipeline integration.
   
4. **Community Support**:
Pulumi has an active community contributing modules, plugins, and extensions for various cloud providers, ensuring a wide range of resources and support, while Atlas has a robust community but with a primary focus on Terraform-based solutions.
   
5. **State Management**:
Atlas has built-in state management capabilities that simplify tracking and storing the state of infrastructure deployments, whereas Pulumi enables users to choose how and where to store state, providing more flexibility in state management strategies.
   
6. **Deployment Flexibility**:
Atlas supports deployment to multiple cloud providers and on-premises infrastructure, offering a diverse range of deployment options, whereas Pulumi emphasizes cloud-native deployments and serverless architectures, aligning closely with modern cloud development practices.

In Summary, Atlas and Pulumi differ in their hosting environment, language support, workflow automation, community support, state management, and deployment flexibility, catering to distinct user requirements and preferences in cloud infrastructure management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Atlas, Pulumi

Daniel
Daniel

May 4, 2020

Decided

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

426k views426k
Comments
Sergey
Sergey

Contractor at Adaptive

Apr 17, 2020

Decided

Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

426k views426k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Atlas
Atlas
Pulumi
Pulumi

Atlas is one foundation to manage and provide visibility to your servers, containers, VMs, configuration management, service discovery, and additional operations services.

Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.

One command to develop any application: vagrant up;One command to deploy any application: vagrant push
Containers - Deploy a Docker container to production in 5 minutes using your favorite orchestrator.; Serverless - Stand up a serverless API or event handler in 5 minutes using a real lambda in code.; Infrastructure - Manage cloud infrastructure or hosted services using infrastructure as code.; CoLaDa - Embrace containers, lambdas, and data, using a modern, multi-cloud framework.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
33
Stacks
306
Followers
125
Followers
293
Votes
0
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 8
    Infrastructure as code with less pain
  • 4
    Best-in-class kubernetes support
  • 3
    Can use many languages
  • 3
    Simple
  • 2
    Can be self-hosted

What are some alternatives to Atlas, Pulumi?

AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

Scalr

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Azure Resource Manager

Azure Resource Manager

It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment.

Habitat

Habitat

Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager allows you to specify all the resources needed for your application in a declarative format using yaml.

AWS Cloud Development Kit

AWS Cloud Development Kit

It is an open source software development framework to model and provision your cloud application resources using familiar programming languages. It uses the familiarity and expressive power of programming languages for modeling your applications. It provides you with high-level components that preconfigure cloud resources with proven defaults, so you can build cloud applications without needing to be an expert.

Yocto

Yocto

It is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture. It provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices, or anywhere a customized Linux OS is needed.

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

Buildroot

Buildroot

It is a tool that simplifies and automates the process of building a complete Linux system for an embedded system, using cross-compilation.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana