Arquillian vs Cucumber: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Architecture: Arquillian is primarily used for integration testing of Java applications, allowing developers to test their code in a real environment. On the other hand, Cucumber is a tool that supports behavior-driven development, where tests are written in a language that stakeholders can understand.

2. Test Scenarios: Arquillian focuses on functional and integration testing of Java applications by deploying them in different containers and testing in a real environment. In contrast, Cucumber is more focused on testing the behavior of the application based on user scenarios written in plain language known as Gherkin.

3. Test Language: Arquillian uses Java for writing test cases and does not require a separate language for defining test scenarios. Cucumber, however, uses Gherkin syntax to define test scenarios that are then mapped to the actual test code written in programming languages like Java, Ruby, or others.

4. Collaboration: Arquillian is more suitable for developers and QA engineers who need to test the integration of components within a Java application, whereas Cucumber is popular among BAs, QA teams, and non-technical stakeholders due to its focus on behavior-driven development and plain language scenarios.

5. Reporting: Arquillian may not have built-in reporting capabilities for test results, which may require integration with other tools for reporting purposes. In contrast, Cucumber provides detailed and user-friendly reports of test execution, making it easier for stakeholders to understand the test outcomes.

6. Community Support: Arquillian has a strong community of Java developers who contribute to its evolution, while Cucumber has a vibrant community that focuses on supporting behavior-driven development practices and Gherkin syntax for writing test scenarios in various languages.

In Summary, <Write summary here>