Apigility vs Charles

Overview

Charles

Stacks140

Followers167

Votes0

Apigility

Stacks37

Followers105

Votes2

GitHub Stars442

Forks118

Apigility vs Charles: What are the differences?

Flexibility in API development: Apigility is specifically designed for creating APIs quickly and easily, providing a wide range of features and tools tailored for API development. On the other hand, Charles is primarily a web debugging proxy tool that allows users to inspect and analyze network traffic between their computer and the internet.
GUI vs Command Line Interface: Apigility offers a user-friendly graphical interface that allows users to design, build, and manage APIs without needing to write code. In contrast, Charles is a command-line based tool that requires users to interact with it through commands and configurations.
Focus on API Documentation: Apigility places a strong emphasis on generating API documentation automatically, making it easier for developers to understand and consume the APIs they create. While Charles does provide some limited ability to view HTTP requests and responses, it does not offer the same level of built-in documentation features.
Community and Support: Apigility is backed by the Zend Framework community, offering a wealth of resources, forums, and community-driven support for users facing challenges or looking for advice on API development. In comparison, Charles has a smaller user community and may have limited resources available for troubleshooting or assistance.
Integration with Other Tools: Apigility seamlessly integrates with other Zend products and services, allowing for a more comprehensive and streamlined development experience. Charles, on the other hand, may require additional configurations or workarounds to integrate with other tools and services.
Pricing and Licensing: Apigility is open-source and free to use, making it accessible to a wide range of developers and organizations. Charles, on the other hand, offers a free trial but requires a paid license for continued use, which may pose a barrier for some users.

In Summary, Apigility and Charles differ in their focus on API development, user interface, documentation capabilities, community support, tool integration, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Charles	Apigility
Charles is a web proxy (HTTP Proxy / HTTP Monitor) that runs on your own computer. Your web browser (or any other Internet application) is then configured to access the Internet through Charles, and Charles is then able to record and display for you all of the data that is sent and received.	An API-based architecture is essential to agile delivery of mobile applications. Apigility provides JSON representations that can be parsed and used in any mobile framework; write for the web or native applications simultaneously!
SSL Proxying – view SSL requests and responses in plain text;Bandwidth Throttling to simulate slower Internet connections including latency;AJAX debugging – view XML and JSON requests and responses as a tree or as text;AMF – view the contents of Flash Remoting / Flex Remoting messages as a tree;Repeat requests to test back-end changes;Edit requests to test different inputs;Breakpoints to intercept and edit requests or responses;Validate recorded HTML, CSS and RSS/atom responses using the W3C validator	RESTful or RPC services; JSON (specifically, HAL); Problem Details for HTTP APIs; Versioning; Normalisation and Validation; Authentication (HTTP Basic/Digest, OAuth2); Documentation (HTML, Swagger).
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 442
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 118
Stacks 140	Stacks 37
Followers 167	Followers 105
Votes 0	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Follows Standards, Easy to Use, Design Patterns Used 1 Active dev community, full-featured, REST + RPC
Integrations
No integrations available	PHP

What are some alternatives to Charles, Apigility?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Apigility vs Charles: What are the differences?

Flexibility in API development: Apigility is specifically designed for creating APIs quickly and easily, providing a wide range of features and tools tailored for API development. On the other hand, Charles is primarily a web debugging proxy tool that allows users to inspect and analyze network traffic between their computer and the internet.
GUI vs Command Line Interface: Apigility offers a user-friendly graphical interface that allows users to design, build, and manage APIs without needing to write code. In contrast, Charles is a command-line based tool that requires users to interact with it through commands and configurations.
Focus on API Documentation: Apigility places a strong emphasis on generating API documentation automatically, making it easier for developers to understand and consume the APIs they create. While Charles does provide some limited ability to view HTTP requests and responses, it does not offer the same level of built-in documentation features.
Community and Support: Apigility is backed by the Zend Framework community, offering a wealth of resources, forums, and community-driven support for users facing challenges or looking for advice on API development. In comparison, Charles has a smaller user community and may have limited resources available for troubleshooting or assistance.
Integration with Other Tools: Apigility seamlessly integrates with other Zend products and services, allowing for a more comprehensive and streamlined development experience. Charles, on the other hand, may require additional configurations or workarounds to integrate with other tools and services.
Pricing and Licensing: Apigility is open-source and free to use, making it accessible to a wide range of developers and organizations. Charles, on the other hand, offers a free trial but requires a paid license for continued use, which may pose a barrier for some users.

In Summary, Apigility and Charles differ in their focus on API development, user interface, documentation capabilities, community support, tool integration, and pricing models.

Apigility vs Charles

Overview