Amazon Glacier vs Cohesity: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Amazon Glacier and Cohesity

1. **Data Storage Model**: Amazon Glacier follows a pay-per-use storage model where customers pay based on the amount of data stored, while Cohesity offers a flat rate pricing model regardless of the data volume.
2. **Data Retrieval Time**: Amazon Glacier has retrieval times ranging from a few minutes to several hours based on the retrieval options chosen, while Cohesity provides near-instant data access for rapid recovery.
3. **Data Management Capabilities**: Amazon Glacier primarily focuses on data archiving and long-term storage with limited data management features, whereas Cohesity offers comprehensive data management capabilities, including data protection, disaster recovery, and data analytics.
4. **Integration with Cloud Services**: Amazon Glacier seamlessly integrates with other Amazon Web Services (AWS) for cloud-based solutions, while Cohesity provides integration with multiple cloud platforms and on-premises solutions for hybrid cloud operations.
5. **Security and Compliance Features**: Amazon Glacier offers encryption at rest and in transit but lacks advanced security features compared to Cohesity, which provides end-to-end data encryption, compliance reporting, and advanced security controls for regulatory requirements.
6. **Scalability and Performance**: Amazon Glacier is highly scalable but may have limitations in performance for large data volumes, while Cohesity offers scalable performance with distributed architecture to handle data growth efficiently.

In Summary, Amazon Glacier and Cohesity differ in terms of data storage model, data retrieval time, data management capabilities, integration with cloud services, security features, and scalability and performance.