Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ace

28
86
+ 1
5
Capybara

491
186
+ 1
15
Add tool

Ace vs Capybara: What are the differences?

Developers describe Ace as "Embeddable code editor written in JavaScript". Ace is a standalone code editor written in JavaScript. Our goal is to create a browser based editor that matches and extends the features, usability and performance of existing native editors such as TextMate, Vim or Eclipse. It can be easily embedded in any web page or JavaScript application. On the other hand, Capybara is detailed as "Acceptance test framework for web applications". Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

Ace can be classified as a tool in the "Collaborative Text Editor" category, while Capybara is grouped under "Testing Frameworks".

Ace and Capybara are both open source tools. Ace with 20K GitHub stars and 4.4K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Capybara with 8.85K GitHub stars and 1.29K GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Ace
Pros of Capybara
  • 2
    The best Editor out there
  • 1
    Non-microsoft
  • 1
    Javascript based
  • 1
    Faster to load and edit big files
  • 12
    Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps
  • 2
    Synchronous with Rack::Test
  • 1
    Fast with Rack::Test

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Ace
Cons of Capybara
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Hard to make reproducible tests when using with browser

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Ace?

    Ace is a standalone code editor written in JavaScript. Our goal is to create a browser based editor that matches and extends the features, usability and performance of existing native editors such as TextMate, Vim or Eclipse. It can be easily embedded in any web page or JavaScript application.

    What is Capybara?

    Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Ace?
    What companies use Capybara?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Ace or Capybara.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Ace?
    What tools integrate with Capybara?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Ace and Capybara?
    Firepad
    An open source collaborative code and text editor. Share documents and see changes occur in real-time.
    Tandem
    Tandem is a decentralized, collaborative text-editing solution. Tandem works with native text editors, works across different editors, and uses peer-to-peer connections to facilitate communication. Tandem exists as a set of plugins for native text editors. We currently support Sublime Text 3 and Neovim. We also unofficially support Vim.
    Graphite Docs
    Graphite enables convenient, secure, decentralized, and user-owned file creation, file storage, communication, and sharing.
    Rustpad
    It is an efficient and minimal open-source collaborative text editor based on the operational transformation algorithm. It lets users collaborate in real-time while writing code in their browser. It is completely self-hosted and fits in a tiny Docker image, no database required.
    See all alternatives