StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Visual Version Control
  5. Abstract vs Folio vs Pixelapse

Abstract vs Folio vs Pixelapse

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pixelapse
Pixelapse
Stacks7
Followers8
Votes0
Folio
Folio
Stacks23
Followers35
Votes2
Abstract
Abstract
Stacks125
Followers86
Votes3

Abstract vs Folio vs Pixelapse: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown document summarizes the key differences between Abstract, Folio, and Pixelapse, focusing on specific characteristics unique to each platform.

  1. Integration with Design Software: Abstract seamlessly integrates with design software like Sketch, enabling real-time collaboration and version control within the app. Folio, on the other hand, does not offer direct integration with design software, making the workflow less efficient for designers. Pixelapse provides integration with popular design tools, but not as robust as Abstract.

  2. Version Control Capabilities: Abstract offers advanced version control features, allowing designers to track changes, revert to previous versions, and merge branches efficiently. Folio lacks sophisticated version control capabilities, hindering collaborative design efforts. Pixelapse provides basic version control but lacks the advanced functions found in Abstract.

  3. Collaboration Tools: Abstract provides robust collaboration tools such as commenting, sharing, and task management, enhancing team communication and productivity. Folio offers limited collaboration features, making it challenging for teams to work together effectively. Pixelapse falls between Abstract and Folio in terms of collaboration tools, providing some features but not as comprehensive as Abstract.

  4. Project Organization: Abstract helps designers organize projects effectively through project spaces, branches, and design documentation, enhancing workflow structure and clarity. Folio lacks extensive project organization capabilities, leading to potential confusion and disorganization in design projects. Pixelapse offers decent project organization features but not as advanced as Abstract.

  5. Workflow Automation: Abstract streamlines design workflows with automated tasks like design file syncing, notifications, and updates, saving time and effort for designers. Folio lacks extensive workflow automation features, requiring more manual input and management from team members. Pixelapse provides some workflow automation tools but not as comprehensive as Abstract.

  6. Security Measures: Abstract prioritizes data security with encryption, access controls, and data protection policies to safeguard sensitive design assets. Folio may have fewer security measures in place, potentially posing risks to confidential design data. Pixelapse also prioritizes security but may not offer the same level of protection as Abstract.

In Summary, the key differences between Abstract, Folio, and Pixelapse lie in their integration with design software, version control capabilities, collaboration tools, project organization, workflow automation, and security measures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pixelapse
Pixelapse
Folio
Folio
Abstract
Abstract

Pixelapse Is Where Your Designs Live Version Control + Backup + Collaboration

Folio is a simple version control app for designers. It lets you clean up all your duplicates by allowing you to browse and restore previous versions of your design documents.

Abstract builds upon and extends the stable technology of Git to host and manage your work.

Automatic Version Control & Backup;50 File Formats and Counting...;Multi-page File Support;Re-download Old Source Files;Large File Support;Annotation On Images;Intelligent Markdown Comments;Share Instantly Via Permalink;Compare Revisions Easily;Your Personal Pixelapse Badge;Portfolio Page;Learn From The Pros;Find The Best Designers
Beautiful browser;Full visual history;Really, really fast;Built on Git
version control; commenting; annotation; branching; merging
Statistics
Stacks
7
Stacks
23
Stacks
125
Followers
8
Followers
35
Followers
86
Votes
0
Votes
2
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Easy to used git client for designers
Pros
  • 2
    Great way to maintain historical uxd knowledge
  • 1
    Easy to track down versions
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git
Slack
Slack
Sketch
Sketch

What are some alternatives to Pixelapse, Folio, Abstract?

TortoiseSVN

TortoiseSVN

It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

LayerVault

LayerVault

One central LayerVault repository. Accessible to everyone, simplified, and organized without the effort. Whether using LayerVault Sync or Dropbox, we store and organize your design work. No desktop interface or command line.

Gource

Gource

It is an OpenGL-based 3D visualisation tool for source control repositories. The repository is displayed as a tree where the root of the repository is the centre, directories are branches and files are leaves. Contributors to the source code appear and disappear as they contribute to specific files and directories.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack