StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Hub Management
  5. 3scale vs Kong

3scale vs Kong

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

3scale
3scale
Stacks51
Followers92
Votes16
Kong
Kong
Stacks671
Followers1.5K
Votes139
GitHub Stars42.1K
Forks5.0K

3scale vs Kong: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between 3scale and Kong

Introduction

In the world of API management, both 3scale and Kong are popular choices. However, there are some key differences between the two that can help you make an informed decision based on your specific requirements.

  1. Deployment Model: 3scale is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solution, meaning it is hosted and managed by the vendor. On the other hand, Kong is available as open-source software which can be self-hosted or deployed in the cloud. This difference gives you more control and flexibility over your infrastructure with Kong.

  2. Pricing and Licensing: 3scale follows a subscription-based pricing model, often charging based on the number of requests or the features required. Kong, as open-source software, is free to use, but for additional features and support, Kong Enterprise can be purchased. This difference in pricing and licensing can be a significant factor depending on your budget and specific needs.

  3. Customizability and Extensibility: Kong, being an open-source solution, allows for extensive customizability and extensibility. You can modify the code, add plugins, and tailor the solution to your requirements. On the other hand, while 3scale does offer some customization options, they are more limited compared to Kong. This difference can be crucial if your organization requires more flexibility and control over the API gateway.

  4. Developer Experience: 3scale provides a developer portal out-of-the-box, allowing you to document, publish, and manage your APIs efficiently. Kong, on the other hand, does not include a developer portal. However, Kong integrates well with other API management solutions and can be seamlessly connected with existing developer portals. This difference may be considered if having a built-in developer portal is a priority for your organization.

  5. Community and Support: Kong benefits from a strong open-source community, which means that you can get extensive support from the community forums, documentation, and plugins developed by the community. 3scale, being a SaaS solution, comes with dedicated technical support provided by the vendor. Depending on your preference and requirements, this difference in support options can be a deciding factor.

  6. Security Features: Both 3scale and Kong offer various security features such as rate limiting, authentication, and JWT validation. However, Kong also provides plugins for additional security measures like Web Application Firewall (WAF) and Bot detection. This difference in security features can be significant if your organization requires advanced security capabilities.

In Summary, the key differences between 3scale and Kong lie in the deployment model, pricing/licensing, customizability/extensibility, developer experience, community/support, and security features. These differences can help you choose the API management solution that best fits your specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on 3scale, Kong

Prateek
Prateek

Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

3scale
3scale
Kong
Kong

3scale's API Management platform provides services and solutions, allowing you to Operate, Manage and Distribute your APIs. Trusted by 450+ API programs.

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

API management dashboard; User authentication; Rate limiting; Analytics; Monetization; Developer portal;
Logging: Log requests and responses to your system over TCP, UDP or to disk; OAuth2.0: Add easily an OAuth2.0 authentication to your APIs; Monitoring: Live monitoring provides key load and performance server metrics; IP-restriction: Whitelist or blacklist IPs that can make requests; Authentication: Manage consumer credentials query string and header tokens; Rate-limiting: Block and throttle requests based on IP or authentication; Transformations: Add, remove or manipulate HTTP params and headers on-the-fly; CORS: Enable cross-origin requests to your APIs that would otherwise be blocked; Anything: Need custom functionality? Extend Kong with your own Lua plugins;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
42.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.0K
Stacks
51
Stacks
671
Followers
92
Followers
1.5K
Votes
16
Votes
139
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Integrated developer portal
  • 4
    Full lifecycle api management
  • 3
    Plugable api management layer
  • 3
    Separates policy definition from enforcement
Pros
  • 37
    Easy to maintain
  • 32
    Easy to install
  • 26
    Flexible
  • 21
    Great performance
  • 7
    Api blueprint
Integrations
No integrations available
Cassandra
Cassandra
Docker
Docker
Prometheus
Prometheus
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
NGINX
NGINX
Vagrant
Vagrant

What are some alternatives to 3scale, Kong?

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.

Tyk Cloud

Tyk Cloud

Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.

Mashape

Mashape

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

RapidAPI

RapidAPI

RapidAPI is the worlds largest API marketplace with over 10,000 APIs available. Developers can find, connect, and manage all of their API connections through a single platform. As an API Provider, you can market, manage, and monetize your API on the world’s largest API marketplace, instantly exposing it to 1 million developers.

Moesif

Moesif

Build a winning API platform with instant, meaningful visibility into API usage and customer adoption

Ambassador

Ambassador

Map services to arbitrary URLs in a single, declarative YAML file. Configure routes with CORS support, circuit breakers, timeouts, and more. Replace your Kubernetes ingress controller. Route gRPC, WebSockets, or HTTP.

Mashery

Mashery

Sign In and discover new APIs from our open data commons of RESTful APIs. Mashery's API management offerings include strategic consulting & developer support to help you build your business.

ProgrammableWeb

ProgrammableWeb

ProgrammableWeb is more than a directory and community, it's programmable. Our "API for APIs" gives you a simple and structured way to access the powerful registry and repository capabilities of PW. Use your favorite language to search and retrieve APIs, mashups, and other data from our catalog. We've got samples in PHP, Java, .NET and JavaScript to get you started.

Gattera

Gattera

Are you a non-traditional business and you're looking for a real partner that you can process your payments? We are here for you!

Azure API Management

Azure API Management

Today's innovative enterprises are adopting API architectures to accelerate growth. Streamline your work across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with a single place for managing all your APIs.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope