Alternatives to SendBird logo

Alternatives to SendBird

PubNub, Stream, Firebase, QuickBlox, and MessageBird are the most popular alternatives and competitors to SendBird.
136
403
+ 1
78

What is SendBird and what are its top alternatives?

SendBird is a popular chat API and messaging SDK that enables developers to add real-time chat and messaging features to their applications. Key features of SendBird include real-time notifications, message threading, file sharing, and moderation tools. However, some limitations of SendBird include high pricing for larger usage volumes and limited customization options for the UI.

  1. PubNub: PubNub offers a real-time communication platform with features such as chat, notifications, and data streaming. Pros include scalability and reliability, while cons include potentially higher costs for large-scale deployments.

  2. Twilio: Twilio provides a communication platform with chat, voice, and video capabilities. Key features include scalability, global reach, and extensive documentation. A downside is the complexity of the platform for beginners.

  3. Pusher: Pusher offers a real-time messaging platform with features like chat, notifications, and presence indicators. Pros include ease of integration and a generous free tier, while cons include limited customization options.

  4. Stream Chat: Stream Chat provides a chat API and SDK with features like message threads, reactions, and typing indicators. Key features include robust documentation and ease of use, but cons may include higher pricing for larger usage volumes.

  5. Firebase Realtime Database: Firebase Realtime Database is a NoSQL cloud database that supports real-time updates. Pros include seamless integration with other Firebase services, while cons include potential performance issues with large datasets.

  6. Socket.IO: Socket.IO is a library that enables real-time, bidirectional event-based communication. Key features include cross-platform support and auto-reconnection, but cons may include a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  7. Layer: Layer offers a messaging platform for building in-app messaging experiences. Pros include rich message features and customization options, while cons may include limited scalability for larger applications.

  8. CometChat: CometChat is a chat API and SDK that supports text, voice, and video chat. Key features include in-app voice and video calling, but cons may include a less extensive feature set compared to other providers.

  9. Applozic: Applozic provides a chat SDK with features like message search, group chat, and push notifications. Pros include a comprehensive feature set and robust customer support, while cons may include potential costs for advanced features.

  10. Agora: Agora offers a real-time communication platform with voice and video chat capabilities. Key features include low-latency communication and global scalability, but cons may include complex pricing structures for different features.

Top Alternatives to SendBird

  • PubNub
    PubNub

    PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server. ...

  • Stream
    Stream

    Stream allows you to build scalable feeds, activity streams, and chat. Stream’s simple, yet powerful API’s and SDKs are used by some of the largest and most popular applications for feeds and chat. SDKs available for most popular languages. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • QuickBlox
    QuickBlox

    Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br> ...

  • MessageBird
    MessageBird

    At MessageBird we believe that communicating with a business should feel as natural as communicating with a friend. That's why our SMS, Voice and Conversations APIs continue to revolutionize company-customer interactions. ...

  • CometChat
    CometChat

    CometChat offers a comprehensive in-app chat SDK platform that equips businesses with the tools to integrate real-time chat, voice, and video into their applications. ...

  • Pusher
    Pusher

    Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features. ...

  • Twilio
    Twilio

    Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs. ...

SendBird alternatives & related posts

PubNub logo

PubNub

237
457
238
Build real-time apps quickly and scale them globally.
237
457
+ 1
238
PROS OF PUBNUB
  • 36
    Massively scalable & easy to use
  • 25
    Easy setup
  • 20
    Reliable
  • 19
    Great support
  • 14
    Flexible to integrate to custom applications
  • 13
    Sockets at Scale
  • 13
    99.999% availability guarantees
  • 13
    High-Performance
  • 12
    High-Reliability
  • 12
    Multiplexing
  • 7
    Scalability
  • 5
    High-Availability
  • 5
    70+ SDKs
  • 4
    Security
  • 4
    Azure Add-on
  • 3
    Heroku Add-on
  • 3
    Presence
  • 3
    Flexible
  • 3
    Easy to setup
  • 2
    Data Streams
  • 2
    Free Plan
  • 2
    Server-Side Cache
  • 2
    PhoneGap Plugin
  • 2
    AngularJS Adapter
  • 2
    Data Sync
  • 2
    Analytics
  • 2
    Support
  • 1
    Easy setup and very reliable
  • 1
    High cost, going up more in Summer '15
  • 1
    Cool
  • 1
    Angular 2+ integration
  • 1
    Documentation, easy to use, great people/service
  • 1
    CTO stephen also is A++++++
  • 1
    Real time and easy to use.
  • 1
    Easy integration with iOS apps
CONS OF PUBNUB
  • 1
    Costly

related PubNub posts

I love Python and JavaScript . You can do the same JavaScript async operations in Python by using asyncio. This is particularly useful when you need to do socket programming in Python. With streaming sockets, data can be sent or received at any time. In case your Python program is in the middle of executing some code, other threads can handle the new socket data. Libraries like asyncio implement multiple threads, so your Python program can work in an asynchronous fashion. PubNub makes bi-directional data streaming between devices even easier.

See more

Vue.js vuex Quasar Framework PubNub Apache Cordova Spring Boot We built our phone app using apache cordova since it has plugins for all native mobile functionality that we needed , and it saved us time rather than maintaining separate native swift and android codebase. We used an upcoming framework called quasar that helped us bootstrap our cordova project in vue js , and also has a ton of built in vue components. In order to push data to our phone on the fly , we used pubnub. It was super easy to add in a few lines to code to do this. We would save data on the server , and use pubnub to communicate updates to all the clients. Another nifty feature offered by pubnub that we used was mobile notifications delivery. : you send data to pubnub who inturn forward it to apns or firebase depending on the payload. On the server side we used plain old spring boot application , and configured cross domain communication to allow requests from ://file domain. ( Corodva app is a bunch of web html files packaged as app ).

We also heavily used cordova plugins to talk to phone , eg. cordova-plugin-calendar and cordova-plugin-local-notification : The second one was used to generate notifications from within the app , when the app is already open but you are in a different screen and want user to be notified . If the app is not open native push notifications delivered through apns / firebase would show.

I am pretty happy with out decision . other than the fact that quasar framework got recently upgraded to v1 and some of the newer components that replace the older ones do not maintain the same look and feel , an example of that is linked below.

See more
Stream logo

Stream

227
224
54
Build scalable feeds, activity streams & chat in a few hours instead of months.
227
224
+ 1
54
PROS OF STREAM
  • 18
    Up and running in few minutes
  • 18
    Integrates via easy-to-use REST API
  • 18
    It's easy to setup with the minimum coding
CONS OF STREAM
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Stream posts

    Nick Parsons
    Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 4.3M views

    Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

    We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

    We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

    Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

    #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

    See more
    Vishal Narkhede
    Javascript Developer at getStream.io · | 19 upvotes · 620.4K views

    Recently, the team at Stream published a React Native SDK for our new Chat by Stream product. React Native brings the power of JavaScript to the world of mobile development, making it easy to develop apps for multiple platforms. We decided to publish two different endpoints for the SDK – Expo and React Native (non-expo), to avoid the hurdle and setup of using the Expo library in React Native only projects on the consumer side.

    The capability of style customization is one a large deal breaker for frontend SDKs. To solve this, we decided to use styled-components in our SDK, which makes it easy to add support for themes on top of our existing components. This practice reduces the maintenance effort for stylings of custom components and keeps the overall codebase clean.

    For module bundling, we decided to go with Rollup.js instead of Webpack due to its simplicity and performance in the area of library/module providers. We are using Babel for transpiling code, enabling our team to use JavaScript's next-generation features. Additionally, we are using the React Styleguidist component documentation, which makes documenting the React Native code a breeze.

    See more
    Firebase logo

    Firebase

    40.8K
    35K
    2K
    The Realtime App Platform
    40.8K
    35K
    + 1
    2K
    PROS OF FIREBASE
    • 371
      Realtime backend made easy
    • 270
      Fast and responsive
    • 242
      Easy setup
    • 215
      Real-time
    • 191
      JSON
    • 134
      Free
    • 128
      Backed by google
    • 83
      Angular adaptor
    • 68
      Reliable
    • 36
      Great customer support
    • 32
      Great documentation
    • 25
      Real-time synchronization
    • 21
      Mobile friendly
    • 19
      Rapid prototyping
    • 14
      Great security
    • 12
      Automatic scaling
    • 11
      Freakingly awesome
    • 8
      Super fast development
    • 8
      Angularfire is an amazing addition!
    • 8
      Chat
    • 6
      Firebase hosting
    • 6
      Built in user auth/oauth
    • 6
      Awesome next-gen backend
    • 6
      Ios adaptor
    • 4
      Speed of light
    • 4
      Very easy to use
    • 3
      Great
    • 3
      It's made development super fast
    • 3
      Brilliant for startups
    • 2
      Free hosting
    • 2
      Cloud functions
    • 2
      JS Offline and Sync suport
    • 2
      Low battery consumption
    • 2
      .net
    • 2
      The concurrent updates create a great experience
    • 2
      Push notification
    • 2
      I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
    • 2
      Great all-round functionality
    • 2
      Free authentication solution
    • 1
      Easy Reactjs integration
    • 1
      Google's support
    • 1
      Free SSL
    • 1
      CDN & cache out of the box
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Large
    • 1
      Faster workflow
    • 1
      Serverless
    • 1
      Good Free Limits
    • 1
      Simple and easy
    CONS OF FIREBASE
    • 31
      Can become expensive
    • 16
      No open source, you depend on external company
    • 15
      Scalability is not infinite
    • 9
      Not Flexible Enough
    • 7
      Cant filter queries
    • 3
      Very unstable server
    • 3
      No Relational Data
    • 2
      Too many errors
    • 2
      No offline sync

    related Firebase posts

    Johnny Bell

    I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

    I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

    I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

    Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

    Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

    With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

    If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

    See more
    Collins Ogbuzuru
    Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 34 upvotes · 219.8K views

    Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

    React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

    ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

    Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

    I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

    See more
    QuickBlox logo

    QuickBlox

    31
    106
    7
    Connect your user with mobile group chat, content sharing, user accounts and more
    31
    106
    + 1
    7
    PROS OF QUICKBLOX
    • 7
      Flexibility
    CONS OF QUICKBLOX
      Be the first to leave a con

      related QuickBlox posts

      MessageBird logo

      MessageBird

      74
      131
      4
      Making business communications feel as natural as communicating with friends.
      74
      131
      + 1
      4
      PROS OF MESSAGEBIRD
      • 1
        User friendly
      • 1
        Quality
      • 1
        Low Cost of entry
      • 1
        Powerful
      CONS OF MESSAGEBIRD
        Be the first to leave a con

        related MessageBird posts

        CometChat logo

        CometChat

        11
        45
        0
        Seamless Real-Time Chat Integration for Your Applications
        11
        45
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF COMETCHAT
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF COMETCHAT
            Be the first to leave a con

            related CometChat posts

            Yeongju Park
            SW Web Engineer at Sense Korea · | 4 upvotes · 76.8K views
            Shared insights
            on
            MSSQLMSSQLSendBirdSendBirdCometChatCometChat

            I am considering which chat solution to choose between CometChat and SendBird, for our new app. The condition is, the app is going to run in a private network and has to connect with MSSQL. Any advice on other things I have to consider before choosing one, or is there another chat service you would recommend? Thank you!

            See more
            Pusher logo

            Pusher

            608
            1.4K
            234
            Hosted APIs to build realtime apps with less code
            608
            1.4K
            + 1
            234
            PROS OF PUSHER
            • 55
              An easy way to give customers realtime features
            • 40
              Websockets
            • 34
              Simple
            • 27
              Easy to get started with
            • 25
              Free plan
            • 12
              Heroku Add-on
            • 11
              Easy and fast to configure and to understand
            • 9
              JSON
            • 6
              Happy
            • 6
              Azure Add-on
            • 5
              Support
            • 4
              Push notification
            CONS OF PUSHER
            • 11
              Costly

            related Pusher posts

            Which messaging service (Pusher vs. PubNub vs. Google Cloud Pub/Sub) to use for IoT?

            See more
            Kirill Shirinkin
            Cloud and DevOps Consultant at mkdev · | 3 upvotes · 474.2K views
            Shared insights
            on
            MattermostMattermostPusherPusherTwilioTwilio
            at

            Recently we finished long research on chat tool for our students and mentors. In the end we picked Mattermost Team Edition as the cheapest and most feature complete option. We did consider building everything from scratch and use something like Pusher or Twilio on a backend, but then we would have to implement all the desktop and mobile clients and all the features oursevles. Mattermost gave us flexible API, lots of built in or easy to install integrations and future-proof feature set. We are still integrating it with our main platform but so far the team, existing mentors and students are very happy.

            See more
            Twilio logo

            Twilio

            11.2K
            8.6K
            521
            Bring voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.
            11.2K
            8.6K
            + 1
            521
            PROS OF TWILIO
            • 148
              Powerful, simple, and well documented api
            • 88
              RESTful API
            • 66
              Clear pricing
            • 61
              Great sms services
            • 58
              Low cost of entry
            • 29
              Global SMS Gateway
            • 14
              Good value
            • 12
              Cloud IVR
            • 11
              Simple
            • 11
              Extremely simple to integrate with rails
            • 6
              Great for startups
            • 5
              SMS
            • 3
              Great developer program
            • 3
              Hassle free
            • 2
              Text me the app pages
            • 1
              New Features constantly rolling out
            • 1
              Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy
            • 1
              Easy integration
            • 1
              Two factor authentication
            CONS OF TWILIO
            • 4
              Predictable pricing
            • 2
              Expensive

            related Twilio posts

            Tom Klein

            Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

            See more
            Ravi Sathanapalli
            Director Product Management at Centime · | 7 upvotes · 105.6K views
            Shared insights
            on
            TwilioTwilioAmazon SNSAmazon SNS

            Hi, We are looking to implement 2FA - so that users would be sent a Verification code over their Email and SMS to their phone.

            We faced some limitations with Amazon SNS where we could either send the verification code to email OR to the phone number, while we want to send it to both.

            We also are looking to make the 2FA more flexible by adding any other options later on.

            What are the best alternatives to SNS for this use case and purpose? Looked at Twilio but want to explore other options before making a decision.

            Would be great to know what the experience with Twilio has been, especially the limitations/issues with Twilio...

            Appreciate any input from users of Twilio and others who have had similar use cases.

            See more