Alternatives to Quay.io logo

Alternatives to Quay.io

Docker Hub, Amazon ECR, Harbor, Google Container Registry, and Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Quay.io.
64
86
+ 1
7

What is Quay.io and what are its top alternatives?

Quay.io is a container registry service that allows users to store, manage, and deploy container images. Key features of Quay.io include image scanning for security vulnerabilities, support for multiple cloud providers, and integration with popular CI/CD tools. However, Quay.io has limitations such as lack of built-in continuous deployment capabilities and limited free usage tier for individual developers.

  1. Docker Hub: Docker Hub is a popular container registry service with a vast repository of public images. It offers seamless integration with Docker Engine and Docker Desktop, making it easy to pull and push images. One of the main advantages of Docker Hub is its large community support and extensive image library. However, the free tier has limitations on image storage and bandwidth.
  2. AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR): ECR is a fully managed container registry service provided by AWS. It integrates seamlessly with the AWS ecosystem, offering secure and scalable container image storage. With features like lifecycle policies and IAM permissions, ECR provides granular control over image management. The downside is that costs can add up quickly, especially for large-scale deployments.
  3. Google Container Registry (GCR): GCR is a container registry service offered by Google Cloud Platform. It provides secure storage and management of container images with tight integration with Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). GCR's advanced permissions management and image vulnerability scanning are key highlights. However, pricing can be complex and may not be cost-effective for small projects.
  4. Harbor: Harbor is an open-source container registry with enterprise-level features like role-based access control, vulnerability scanning, and image replication. It can be self-hosted or deployed on cloud platforms, providing flexibility and control over image storage and distribution. While Harbor offers a great range of features, setting up and managing the system can be complex for beginners.
  5. Azure Container Registry: Azure Container Registry is a container registry service provided by Microsoft Azure. It offers secure image storage with Azure Active Directory integration and geo-replication for improved reliability and performance. ACR also integrates well with Azure DevOps for seamless CI/CD pipelines. However, pricing tiers are not as competitive compared to other providers.
  6. JFrog Container Registry: JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager for Docker images, providing features like access control, artifact management, and metadata extraction. It supports various package formats, making it suitable for multi-language environments. JFrog's advanced security features and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines make it a strong alternative to Quay.io. On the downside, licensing costs may be a barrier for small teams.
  7. GitLab Container Registry: GitLab Container Registry is an integrated container registry service within GitLab's DevOps platform. It offers secure storage and management of container images alongside code repositories and CI/CD pipelines, enabling end-to-end automation. GitLab's seamless workflow integration and single UI for code and image management are significant advantages. However, some users may find the feature set limiting compared to dedicated container registry services.
  8. Artifactory: Artifactory is a universal artifact repository manager that supports various package formats, including Docker images. It offers advanced access control, metadata management, and replication capabilities for secure and efficient artifact storage. Artifactory's flexibility to store and manage different types of artifacts makes it a versatile option for organizations with diverse needs. However, the learning curve for setting up and configuring Artifactory can be steep.
  9. Quay by Red Hat: Quay by Red Hat is a secure container registry platform that offers advanced features like image signing, data encryption, and compliance automation. It integrates seamlessly with Red Hat OpenShift for Kubernetes container orchestration and management. Quay's focus on security and regulatory compliance makes it a preferred choice for organizations with strict governance requirements. However, the pricing might be on the higher end for small teams or individual developers.
  10. Pulumi Registry: Pulumi Registry is a modern infrastructure as code platform that allows users to store and share container images alongside infrastructure code. It offers versioned releases, dependency management, and metadata tagging for container images, providing a unified workflow for managing infrastructure and applications. Pulumi's unique approach to infrastructure configuration and deployment sets it apart from traditional container registries. However, the learning curve for transitioning to Pulumi from conventional CI/CD tools may be a challenge for some users.

Top Alternatives to Quay.io

  • Docker Hub
    Docker Hub

    It is the world's easiest way to create, manage, and deliver your teams' container applications. It is the perfect home for your teams' applications. ...

  • Amazon ECR
    Amazon ECR

    It is a fully managed container registry that makes it easy to store, manage, share, and deploy your container images and artifacts anywhere. It eliminates the need to operate your own container repositories or worry about scaling the underlying infrastructure. ...

  • Harbor
    Harbor

    Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ ...

  • Google Container Registry
    Google Container Registry

    It is a single place for your team to manage Docker images, perform vulnerability analysis, and decide who can access what with fine-grained access control. ...

  • Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public
    Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public

    It is a fully managed registry that makes it easy for a developer to publicly share container software worldwide for anyone to download. Anyone (with or without an AWS account) can use it to pull container software for use. Amazon ECR Public Gallery is a website that allows anyone to browse and search for public container images, view developer-provided details, and see pull commands. Developers no longer need to use different private and public registries when building and sharing their public container artifacts. ...

  • Kraken by Uber
    Kraken by Uber

    A P2P-powered Docker registry that focuses on scalability and availability. It is designed for Docker image management, replication and distribution in a hybrid cloud environment. ...

  • Gandalf
    Gandalf

    We provide a secure private registry where users can host their docker images and share them privately and securely within teams. ...

Quay.io alternatives & related posts

Docker Hub logo

Docker Hub

223
257
7
Build and Ship any Application Anywhere
223
257
+ 1
7
PROS OF DOCKER HUB
  • 2
    Uses a very familiar collaboration model as GitHub, the
  • 1
    Provides public and private repositories
  • 1
    Quickly creates organizations, add users or create grou
  • 1
    Allows users to set permissions to restrict access or s
  • 1
    Fairly inexpensive with usage based pricing
  • 1
    Security scanning available
CONS OF DOCKER HUB
  • 1
    Lacks fine grain access control
  • 1
    Does not provide any insight into the registry usage
  • 1
    Lacks LDAP, SAML and OAuth support

related Docker Hub posts

Shared insights
on
Amazon ECRAmazon ECRDocker HubDocker Hub

We have been using Docker Hub free plan for some time, which had automated builds feature included in the free plan. Recently it has been removed from the free plan. Therefore we have thought to either go ahead with a paid plan of Docker Hub, which includes automated builds feature or migrate to use Amazon ECR as the container registry management solution. Since we already use some AWS services, going ahead with Amazon ECR is a viable solution. I am a bit confused as to what would be the best choice going ahead. Please advice...!

See more
nandagiri venkata srinadh
Senior DevOps Engineer at Increff · | 1 upvote · 13.6K views

Which one to choose Docker Hub or Harbor for a startup that is starting its journey into Kubernetes

See more
Amazon ECR logo

Amazon ECR

356
159
5
Share and deploy container software, publicly or privately
356
159
+ 1
5
PROS OF AMAZON ECR
  • 2
    Highly secure as policies can be configured to manage p
  • 1
    No upfront fees or commitments. You pay only for the am
  • 1
    Familiar to AWS users and easy to use
  • 1
    Tight integration with Amazon ECS and the Docker CLI, a
CONS OF AMAZON ECR
  • 1
    Potentially expensive if the containers being deployed
  • 1
    Difficult to use with docker client as it requires crea
  • 1
    Lack of insight into registry usage

related Amazon ECR posts

Shared insights
on
Amazon ECRAmazon ECRDocker HubDocker Hub

We have been using Docker Hub free plan for some time, which had automated builds feature included in the free plan. Recently it has been removed from the free plan. Therefore we have thought to either go ahead with a paid plan of Docker Hub, which includes automated builds feature or migrate to use Amazon ECR as the container registry management solution. Since we already use some AWS services, going ahead with Amazon ECR is a viable solution. I am a bit confused as to what would be the best choice going ahead. Please advice...!

See more
Harbor logo

Harbor

171
182
11
Manage and serve container images in a secure environment (created at VMware)
171
182
+ 1
11
PROS OF HARBOR
  • 4
    Good on-premises container registry
  • 1
    Container Replication
  • 1
    Nice UI
  • 1
    Vulnerability Scanner
  • 1
    Supports LDAP/Active Directory
  • 1
    Supports OIDC
  • 1
    Support multiple authentication methods
  • 1
    Perfect for Teams and Organizations
CONS OF HARBOR
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Harbor posts

    Shared insights
    on
    KubernetesKubernetesHarborHarborAWXAWXDockerDocker

    We are operating a smart water purification plant called AAA. AAA has a Docker-based AI platform, and we want to build several water purification plants like this. In addition, it plans to create a headquarters that manages these water purification plants in an integrated way and build a big data platform there. Although I don't know if Ansible AWX can replace Harbor or Kubernetes among the three solutions above, I would like to know which solution is suitable for us and why. May your business go well...

    See more
    nandagiri venkata srinadh
    Senior DevOps Engineer at Increff · | 1 upvote · 13.6K views

    Which one to choose Docker Hub or Harbor for a startup that is starting its journey into Kubernetes

    See more
    Google Container Registry logo

    Google Container Registry

    49
    19
    0
    Store, manage, and secure your Docker container images
    49
    19
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF GOOGLE CONTAINER REGISTRY
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF GOOGLE CONTAINER REGISTRY
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Google Container Registry posts

        Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public logo

        Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public

        32
        5
        0
        Fully managed registry that makes it easy for a developer to publicly share container software
        32
        5
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF AMAZON ELASTIC CONTAINER REGISTRY PUBLIC
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF AMAZON ELASTIC CONTAINER REGISTRY PUBLIC
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public posts

            Kraken by Uber logo

            Kraken by Uber

            7
            41
            3
            P2P Docker registry capable of distributing TBs of data in seconds
            7
            41
            + 1
            3
            PROS OF KRAKEN BY UBER
            • 3
              Scalability and replication of TB's in a second.
            CONS OF KRAKEN BY UBER
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Kraken by Uber posts

              Gandalf logo

              Gandalf

              3
              9
              0
              Affordable Docker Private Registries
              3
              9
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF GANDALF
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF GANDALF
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Gandalf posts