Home
Application and Data
Languages & Frameworks
Languages
Alternatives to MJML logo

Alternatives to MJML

Foundation, Bootstrap, JavaScript, Python, and Node.js are the most popular alternatives and competitors to MJML.
View Jobs
Tool Profile
mjmlio
mjml.io
78
38
+ 1
0

What is MJML and what are its top alternatives?

MJML is a responsive email framework that allows users to easily create responsive emails that render correctly across various email clients. It provides a set of semantic syntax elements that automatically expand into HTML markup. Some key features of MJML include mobile responsiveness, easy integration with popular email providers, and an intuitive syntax. However, limitations of MJML include a learning curve for beginners and limited customizability compared to hand-coding HTML emails.

  1. Foundation for Emails: Foundation for Emails is a front-end framework for creating responsive HTML emails. It offers a grid system, typography, and components for building emails. Pros of Foundation for Emails include robust customization options and extensive documentation, while a con is the steep learning curve for beginners.
  2. Antwort: Antwort is an open-source responsive email layout that offers a simple grid system and styles for creating email templates. Pros of Antwort include its flexibility and easy-to-use layout, while a con is limited community support compared to more popular frameworks like MJML.
  3. Ink: Ink is a responsive email framework by ZURB that provides a grid system and styles for creating email templates. Pros of Ink include its simplicity and compatibility with various email clients, while a con is the lack of frequent updates compared to other frameworks.
  4. Cerberus: Cerberus is a collection of responsive email patterns that can be easily customized to create email templates. Pros of Cerberus include its modular design and compatibility with major email clients, while a con is the limited number of pre-designed components available.
  5. Maizzle: Maizzle is a framework that allows for building HTML emails in a more modern way using Tailwind CSS. Pros of Maizzle include its flexibility and ease of use for developers familiar with Tailwind CSS, while a con is the reliance on external libraries for customization.
  6. Postcards: Postcards is an online tool for creating responsive email templates with a drag-and-drop editor. Pros of Postcards include its user-friendly interface and ready-to-use templates, while a con is the limited ability to customize templates compared to code-based frameworks.
  7. BEE Free: BEE Free is an online tool that offers a simple drag-and-drop editor for creating responsive email designs. Pros of BEE Free include its ease of use for beginners and a wide range of design elements, while a con is the reliance on the BEE Pro subscription for more advanced features.
  8. Taxi for Email: Taxi for Email is a platform that streamlines the email template creation process with collaboration features and reusable components. Pros of Taxi for Email include its collaborative capabilities and efficient workflow, while a con is the premium pricing model for full access to all features.
  9. Chamaileon: Chamaileon is an online email editor that allows for collaborative email design, version control, and template management. Pros of Chamaileon include its team-friendly features and customizable templates, while a con is the limited integration options compared to other platforms.
  10. Stripo: Stripo is an email design platform with a drag-and-drop editor and collaborative features for creating responsive email templates. Pros of Stripo include its user-friendly interface and extensive library of pre-designed blocks, while a con is the pricing structure for access to premium features.

Top Alternatives to MJML

  • Foundation
    Foundation

    Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices. ...

  • Bootstrap
    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

  • PHP
    PHP

    Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...

  • Java
    Java

    Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere! ...

MJML alternatives & related posts

Foundation logo

Foundation

1.2K
740
The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world
1.2K
740
PROS OF FOUNDATION
  • 160
    Responsive grid
  • 93
    Mobile first
  • 80
    Open source
  • 75
    Semantic
  • 72
    Customizable
  • 52
    Quick to prototype
  • 50
    Simple ui
  • 45
    Fast
  • 44
    Best practices
  • 39
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Neutral style
  • 6
    HTML, SCSS and JS
  • 5
    Accessibility support
  • 5
    Professional
  • 3
    Xy grid
  • 2
    Sass
  • 2
    Every new version is smaller, smarter & more efficient
  • 1
    Robust
CONS OF FOUNDATION
  • 5
    Requires jQuery
  • 4
    Awful site
COMPARE
Foundation logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare Foundation vs MJML

related Foundation posts

Lee Benson
| 8 upvotes · 1.9M views
Shared insights
on
ReactReactGraphQLGraphQLApolloApolloJavaScriptJavaScriptTypeScriptTypeScript+11 more
at

ReactQL is a React + GraphQL front-end starter kit. #JSX is a natural way to think about building UI, and it renders to pure #HTML in the browser and on the server, making it trivial to build server-rendered Single Page Apps. GraphQL via Apollo was chosen for the data layer; #GraphQL makes it simple to request just the data your app needs, and #Apollo takes care of communicating with your API (written in any language; doesn't have to be JavaScript!), caching, and rendering to #React.

ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.

React Helmet was chosen to handle <head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct <title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.

styled-components, Sass, Less and PostCSS were added to give developers a choice of whether to build styles purely in React / JavaScript, or whether to defer to a #css #preprocessor. This is especially useful for interop with UI frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Foundation, etc - ReactQL lets you mix and match #css and renders to both a static .css file during bundling as well as generates per-page <style> tags when using #StyledComponents.

React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.

Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.

ReactQL: Modern stack for React+GraphQL
See more
satya m
| 3 upvotes · 60.8K views
Shared insights
on
BootstrapBootstrapFoundationFoundation

Should I go with Foundation CSS instead of Bootstrap? Or, if any other popular responsive frameworks are out there, please suggest them to me. My site mainly targets mobile or tablet

See more
Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

55.5K
7.7K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
55.5K
7.7K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 472
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 411
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 242
    HTML framework
  • 77
    Popular
  • 77
    Easy setup
  • 77
    Mobile first
  • 58
    Great grid system
  • 52
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 28
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 14
    Grids
  • 9
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 8
    Clean
  • 4
    Love it
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 3
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Devin schumacher rules
  • 2
    Boostrap
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    Easy setup2
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Poop
  • 1
    Vue
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
  • 1
    Super heavy
COMPARE
Bootstrap logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare Bootstrap vs MJML

related Bootstrap posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 6M views
Shared insights
on
CodacyCodacySonarQubeSonarQubeReactReactReact RouterReact RouterReact NativeReact Native+20 more

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Francisco Quintero
Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1.8M views
Shared insights
on
Google MapsGoogle MapsReactReactCreate React AppCreate React AppBootstrapBootstrapKeenKeen+2 more
at

For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

See more
JavaScript logo

JavaScript

370.5K
8.1K
Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
370.5K
8.1K
PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 1.7K
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1.5K
    It's everywhere
  • 1.2K
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 899
    Fast
  • 746
    Light weight
  • 425
    Flexible
  • 392
    You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
  • 286
    Non-blocking i/o
  • 237
    Ubiquitousness
  • 191
    Expressive
  • 55
    Extended functionality to web pages
  • 49
    Relatively easy language
  • 46
    Executed on the client side
  • 30
    Relatively fast to the end user
  • 25
    Pure Javascript
  • 21
    Functional programming
  • 15
    Async
  • 13
    Full-stack
  • 12
    Its everywhere
  • 12
    Future Language of The Web
  • 12
    Setup is easy
  • 11
    JavaScript is the New PHP
  • 11
    Because I love functions
  • 10
    Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
  • 9
    Everyone use it
  • 9
    Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
  • 9
    Easy
  • 9
    Expansive community
  • 8
    For the good parts
  • 8
    Easy to hire developers
  • 8
    No need to use PHP
  • 8
    Most Popular Language in the World
  • 8
    Powerful
  • 8
    Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
  • 7
    It's fun
  • 7
    Its fun and fast
  • 7
    Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
  • 7
    Agile, packages simple to use
  • 7
    Supports lambdas and closures
  • 7
    Love-hate relationship
  • 7
    Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
  • 7
    Evolution of C
  • 7
    Hard not to use
  • 7
    Versitile
  • 7
    Nice
  • 6
    Easy to make something
  • 6
    Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
  • 6
    1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 6
    Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
  • 6
    It let's me use Babel & Typescript
  • 5
    Clojurescript
  • 5
    Everywhere
  • 5
    Scope manipulation
  • 5
    Function expressions are useful for callbacks
  • 5
    Stockholm Syndrome
  • 5
    Promise relationship
  • 5
    Client processing
  • 5
    What to add
  • 4
    Because it is so simple and lightweight
  • 4
    Only Programming language on browser
  • 1
    Subskill #4
  • 1
    Test2
  • 1
    Easy to understand
  • 1
    Not the best
  • 1
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Hard to learn
  • 1
    Easy to learn and test
  • 1
    Love it
  • 1
    Test
  • 0
    Hard 彤
CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 22
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 15
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 9
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 8
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
  • 7
    Thinks strange results are better than errors
  • 6
    Can be ugly
  • 3
    No GitHub
  • 2
    Slow
  • 0
    HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs
COMPARE
JavaScript logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare JavaScript vs MJML

related JavaScript posts

Zach Holman
Founder at Signed · | 51 upvotes · 3.6M views
Shared insights
on
ReactReactApolloApolloRailsRailsJavaScriptJavaScript

Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

JavaScript for People Who Hate JavaScript
See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views
Shared insights
on
JaegerJaegerPythonPythonJavaJavaNode.jsNode.jsGolangGolang+6 more
at

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

Evolving Distributed Tracing at Uber Engineering | Uber Engineering Blog
See more
Python logo

Python

250K
6.9K
A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
250K
6.9K
PROS OF PYTHON
  • 1.2K
    Great libraries
  • 965
    Readable code
  • 848
    Beautiful code
  • 789
    Rapid development
  • 692
    Large community
  • 439
    Open source
  • 394
    Elegant
  • 283
    Great community
  • 274
    Object oriented
  • 222
    Dynamic typing
  • 78
    Great standard library
  • 62
    Very fast
  • 56
    Functional programming
  • 52
    Easy to learn
  • 47
    Scientific computing
  • 36
    Great documentation
  • 30
    Productivity
  • 29
    Matlab alternative
  • 29
    Easy to read
  • 25
    Simple is better than complex
  • 21
    It's the way I think
  • 20
    Imperative
  • 19
    Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 17
    Powerfull language
  • 17
    Machine learning support
  • 16
    Fast and simple
  • 14
    Scripting
  • 12
    Explicit is better than implicit
  • 11
    Ease of development
  • 10
    Clear and easy and powerfull
  • 9
    Unlimited power
  • 8
    It's lean and fun to code
  • 8
    Import antigravity
  • 7
    Print "life is short, use python"
  • 7
    Python has great libraries for data processing
  • 6
    Although practicality beats purity
  • 6
    Fast coding and good for competitions
  • 6
    There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
  • 6
    High Documented language
  • 6
    Readability counts
  • 6
    Rapid Prototyping
  • 6
    I love snakes
  • 6
    Now is better than never
  • 6
    Flat is better than nested
  • 6
    Great for tooling
  • 5
    Great for analytics
  • 5
    Web scraping
  • 5
    Lists, tuples, dictionaries
  • 4
    Complex is better than complicated
  • 4
    Socially engaged community
  • 4
    Plotting
  • 4
    Beautiful is better than ugly
  • 4
    Easy to learn and use
  • 4
    Easy to setup and run smooth
  • 4
    Simple and easy to learn
  • 4
    Multiple Inheritence
  • 4
    CG industry needs
  • 3
    List comprehensions
  • 3
    Powerful language for AI
  • 3
    Flexible and easy
  • 3
    It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
  • 3
    Many types of collections
  • 3
    If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
  • 3
    If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
  • 3
    Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
  • 3
    Pip install everything
  • 3
    No cruft
  • 3
    Generators
  • 3
    Import this
  • 2
    Can understand easily who are new to programming
  • 2
    Securit
  • 2
    Should START with this but not STICK with This
  • 2
    A-to-Z
  • 2
    Because of Netflix
  • 2
    Only one way to do it
  • 2
    Better outcome
  • 2
    Good for hacking
  • 2
    Batteries included
  • 2
    Procedural programming
  • 1
    Sexy af
  • 1
    Automation friendly
  • 1
    Slow
  • 1
    Best friend for NLP
  • 0
    Powerful
  • 0
    Keep it simple
  • 0
    Ni
CONS OF PYTHON
  • 53
    Still divided between python 2 and python 3
  • 28
    Performance impact
  • 26
    Poor syntax for anonymous functions
  • 22
    GIL
  • 19
    Package management is a mess
  • 14
    Too imperative-oriented
  • 12
    Hard to understand
  • 12
    Dynamic typing
  • 12
    Very slow
  • 8
    Indentations matter a lot
  • 8
    Not everything is expression
  • 7
    Incredibly slow
  • 7
    Explicit self parameter in methods
  • 6
    Requires C functions for dynamic modules
  • 6
    Poor DSL capabilities
  • 6
    No anonymous functions
  • 5
    Fake object-oriented programming
  • 5
    Threading
  • 5
    The "lisp style" whitespaces
  • 5
    Official documentation is unclear.
  • 5
    Hard to obfuscate
  • 5
    Circular import
  • 4
    Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
  • 4
    The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
  • 4
    Not suitable for autocomplete
  • 2
    Meta classes
  • 1
    Training wheels (forced indentation)
COMPARE
Python logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare Python vs MJML

related Python posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views
Shared insights
on
JaegerJaegerPythonPythonJavaJavaNode.jsNode.jsGolangGolang+6 more
at

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

Evolving Distributed Tracing at Uber Engineering | Uber Engineering Blog
See more
Emilio Herrera
| 36 upvotes · 42.3K views
Shared insights
on
TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

What do you think about TensorFlow?

Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

See more
Node.js logo

Node.js

192.7K
8.5K
A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
192.7K
8.5K
PROS OF NODE.JS
  • 1.4K
    Npm
  • 1.3K
    Javascript
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 1K
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
  • 487
    Great for apis
  • 477
    Asynchronous
  • 425
    Great community
  • 390
    Great for realtime apps
  • 296
    Great for command line utilities
  • 86
    Websockets
  • 84
    Node Modules
  • 69
    Uber Simple
  • 59
    Great modularity
  • 58
    Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
  • 42
    Easy to start
  • 35
    Great for Data Streaming
  • 32
    Realtime
  • 28
    Awesome
  • 25
    Non blocking IO
  • 18
    Can be used as a proxy
  • 17
    High performance, open source, scalable
  • 16
    Non-blocking and modular
  • 15
    Easy and Fun
  • 14
    Easy and powerful
  • 13
    Future of BackEnd
  • 13
    Same lang as AngularJS
  • 12
    Fullstack
  • 11
    Fast
  • 10
    Scalability
  • 10
    Cross platform
  • 9
    Simple
  • 8
    Mean Stack
  • 7
    Great for webapps
  • 7
    Easy concurrency
  • 6
    Typescript
  • 6
    Fast, simple code and async
  • 6
    React
  • 6
    Friendly
  • 5
    Control everything
  • 5
    Its amazingly fast and scalable
  • 5
    Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 5
    Great speed
  • 5
    Fast development
  • 4
    It's fast
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Isomorphic coolness
  • 3
    Great community
  • 3
    Not Python
  • 3
    Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
  • 3
    TypeScript Support
  • 3
    Blazing fast
  • 3
    Performant and fast prototyping
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
  • 3
    One language, end-to-end
  • 3
    Less boilerplate code
  • 2
    Npm i ape-updating
  • 2
    Event Driven
  • 2
    Lovely
  • 1
    Creat for apis
  • 0
    Node
CONS OF NODE.JS
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
  • 19
    Javascript
  • 11
    Dependency hell
  • 11
    Dependency based on GitHub
  • 10
    Low computational power
  • 7
    Very very Slow
  • 7
    Can block whole server easily
  • 7
    Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
  • 4
    Breaking updates
  • 4
    Unstable
  • 3
    Unneeded over complication
  • 3
    No standard approach
  • 1
    Bad transitive dependency management
  • 1
    Can't read server session
COMPARE
Node.js logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare Node.js vs MJML

related Node.js posts

Anurag Maurya
SDET at Fincent · | 82 upvotes · 140.8K views
Shared insights
on
IstanbulIstanbulChaiChaiMochaMochaSuperTestSuperTestExpressJSExpressJS+1 more

Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

Hello community,

I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

See more
Juan Morales
| 51 upvotes · 1.5M views
Shared insights
on
Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

  1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

  2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

  3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

MovieGeeks
See more
HTML5 logo

HTML5

152.9K
2.2K
5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
152.9K
2.2K
PROS OF HTML5
  • 448
    New doctype
  • 389
    Local storage
  • 334
    Canvas
  • 285
    Semantic header and footer
  • 240
    Video element
  • 121
    Geolocation
  • 106
    Form autofocus
  • 100
    Email inputs
  • 85
    Editable content
  • 79
    Application caches
  • 10
    Easy to use
  • 9
    Cleaner Code
  • 5
    Easy
  • 4
    Websockets
  • 4
    Semantical
  • 3
    Audio element
  • 3
    Content focused
  • 3
    Better
  • 3
    Modern
  • 2
    Compatible
  • 2
    Very easy to learning to HTML
  • 2
    Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
  • 2
    Portability
CONS OF HTML5
  • 2
    Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
  • 1
    Long and winding code
COMPARE
HTML5 logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare HTML5 vs MJML

related HTML5 posts

Sai Rohith Koppuravuri
| 28 upvotes · 90.7K views
Shared insights
on
MySQLMySQLPHPPHPJavaScriptJavaScriptHTML5HTML5

Hey guys, I need some advice on one thing. Currently, I am a fresher and know HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, PHP and, MySQL. Recently I got a client project through one of my friends and he wants me to build an E-learning Management System. Are these skills enough to build an LMS website?

Thanks in advance!! ;)

See more
Jan Vlnas
Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 479.4K views
Shared insights
on
HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

See more
PHP logo

PHP

146.3K
4.6K
A popular general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development
146.3K
4.6K
PROS OF PHP
  • 954
    Large community
  • 820
    Open source
  • 767
    Easy deployment
  • 487
    Great frameworks
  • 387
    The best glue on the web
  • 235
    Continual improvements
  • 185
    Good old web
  • 145
    Web foundation
  • 135
    Community packages
  • 125
    Tool support
  • 35
    Used by wordpress
  • 34
    Excellent documentation
  • 29
    Used by Facebook
  • 23
    Because of Symfony
  • 21
    Dynamic Language
  • 17
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    Cheap hosting
  • 15
    Very powerful web language
  • 14
    Awesome Language and easy to implement
  • 14
    Fast development
  • 14
    Because of Laravel
  • 13
    Composer
  • 12
    Flexibility, syntax, extensibility
  • 9
    Easiest deployment
  • 8
    Readable Code
  • 8
    Fast
  • 7
    Most of the web uses it
  • 7
    Short development lead times
  • 7
    Worst popularity quality ratio
  • 7
    Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments
  • 6
    Faster then ever
  • 6
    Simple, flexible yet Scalable
  • 5
    Open source and large community
  • 4
    Easy to use and learn
  • 4
    Great developer experience
  • 4
    Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)
  • 4
    Is like one zip of air
  • 4
    Open source and great framework
  • 4
    Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework
  • 4
    Cheap to own
  • 4
    Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks
  • 4
    I have no choice :(
  • 2
    Hard not to use
  • 2
    Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps
  • 2
    Interpreted at the run time
  • 2
    Walk away
  • 2
    FFI
  • 2
    Safe the planet
  • 2
    Used by STOMT
  • 2
    Fault tolerance
  • 1
    Simplesaml
  • 1
    Secure
  • 1
    It can get you a lamborghini
  • 1
    Bando
  • 0
    Secure
  • 0
    Largr community
CONS OF PHP
  • 21
    So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find
  • 16
    Inconsistent API
  • 8
    Fragmented community
  • 6
    Not secure
  • 3
    No routing system
  • 3
    Hard to debug
  • 2
    Old
COMPARE
PHP logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare PHP vs MJML

related PHP posts

Nick Rockwell
SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.4M views
Shared insights
on
MySQLMySQLPHPPHPReactReactApolloApolloGraphQLGraphQL+3 more
at

When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

The Evolution of The New York Times Tech Stack | StackShare
See more
Abdussamad ARHUN
| 30 upvotes · 219K views
Shared insights
on
PostgreSQLPostgreSQLExpressJSExpressJSNext.jsNext.jsMySQLMySQLPHPPHP+1 more

Hello, I am building a website for a school that's used by students to find Zoom meeting links, view their marks, and check course materials. It is also used by the teachers to put the meeting links, students' marks, and course materials.

I created a similar website using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL. Now I want to implement this project using some frameworks: Next.js, ExpressJS and use PostgreSQL instead of MYSQL

I want to have some advice on whether these are enough to implement my project.

See more
Java logo

Java

138.2K
3.7K
A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible
138.2K
3.7K
PROS OF JAVA
  • 607
    Great libraries
  • 446
    Widely used
  • 401
    Excellent tooling
  • 396
    Huge amount of documentation available
  • 334
    Large pool of developers available
  • 209
    Open source
  • 203
    Excellent performance
  • 158
    Great development
  • 150
    Used for android
  • 148
    Vast array of 3rd party libraries
  • 61
    Compiled Language
  • 53
    Used for Web
  • 47
    High Performance
  • 46
    Managed memory
  • 45
    Native threads
  • 43
    Statically typed
  • 35
    Easy to read
  • 33
    Great Community
  • 29
    Reliable platform
  • 24
    JVM compatibility
  • 24
    Sturdy garbage collection
  • 22
    Cross Platform Enterprise Integration
  • 20
    Good amount of APIs
  • 20
    Universal platform
  • 18
    Great Support
  • 14
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    Lots of boilerplate
  • 11
    Backward compatible
  • 10
    Everywhere
  • 9
    Excellent SDK - JDK
  • 8
    It's Java
  • 7
    Static typing
  • 7
    Cross-platform
  • 6
    Mature language thus stable systems
  • 6
    Better than Ruby
  • 6
    Long term language
  • 6
    Portability
  • 5
    Vast Collections Library
  • 5
    Clojure
  • 5
    Used for Android development
  • 4
    Most developers favorite
  • 4
    Old tech
  • 4
    Best martial for design
  • 3
    Javadoc
  • 3
    History
  • 3
    Testable
  • 3
    Great Structure
  • 3
    Stable platform, which many new languages depend on
  • 2
    Type Safe
  • 2
    Faster than python
  • 1
    Makes code organized
  • 0
    Job
CONS OF JAVA
  • 33
    Verbosity
  • 27
    NullpointerException
  • 17
    Nightmare to Write
  • 16
    Overcomplexity is praised in community culture
  • 12
    Boiler plate code
  • 8
    Classpath hell prior to Java 9
  • 6
    No REPL
  • 4
    No property
  • 3
    Code are too long
  • 2
    Non-intuitive generic implementation
  • 2
    There is not optional parameter
  • 2
    Floating-point errors
  • 1
    Java's too statically, stronglly, and strictly typed
  • 1
    Returning Wildcard Types
  • 1
    Terrbible compared to Python/Batch Perormence
COMPARE
Java logo
VS
MJML logo
Compare Java vs MJML

related Java posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views
Shared insights
on
JaegerJaegerPythonPythonJavaJavaNode.jsNode.jsGolangGolang+6 more
at

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

Evolving Distributed Tracing at Uber Engineering | Uber Engineering Blog
See more
Kamil Kowalski
Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 4.2M views
Shared insights
on
SeleniumSeleniumJavaJavaRubyRubyElixirElixirJavaScriptJavaScript+1 more
at

When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

See more

Similar Tools

Foundation AlternativesBootstrap AlternativesJavaScript AlternativesPython AlternativesNode.js Alternatives

New Tools

Flyde AlternativesGPTScript AlternativesFastUI AlternativesLLRT Alternativeshtmz Alternatives

Top Tools

JavaScript AlternativesPython AlternativesNode.js AlternativesHTML5 AlternativesPHP Alternatives

Trending Comparisons

HAML vs MJMLCoffeeScript vs MJMLHack vs MJMLJavaScript vs MJMLMJML vs Markdown