Alternatives to Loom logo

Alternatives to Loom

BombBomb, Zoom, Vidyard, CloudApp, and JavaScript are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Loom.
126
72
+ 1
0

What is Loom and what are its top alternatives?

Loom is a popular video messaging tool that allows users to record, share, and communicate through short videos. Users can easily capture their screen, webcam, or both to create tutorials, presentations, or quick video messages. Loom offers features like real-time commenting, editing tools, and integrations with various platforms like Slack and Google Drive. However, some limitations of Loom include limited customization options and the inability to download videos in the free version.

  1. Vmaker: Vmaker is a screen and webcam recording tool that offers features like HD video recording, customizable branding, and the ability to add comments and annotations. Pros of Vmaker include unlimited recording time and easy sharing options, while a con compared to Loom is the lack of direct integrations with other platforms.
  2. Wistia: Wistia is a video hosting platform that also offers screen recording capabilities. Key features include customizable video players, analytics, and lead generation tools. Pros of Wistia include advanced video editing options, while a con compared to Loom is the focus on hosting and analytics rather than direct communication.
  3. CloudApp: CloudApp is a visual communication platform that offers screen recording, GIF creation, and annotation tools. Pros of CloudApp include easy sharing options and integrations with various platforms, while a con compared to Loom is the limited video editing capabilities.
  4. Camtasia: Camtasia is a powerful video editing and screen recording software that offers advanced editing tools, animations, and effects. Pros of Camtasia include professional-grade editing options, while a con compared to Loom is the higher learning curve.
  5. ScreenFlow: ScreenFlow is a Mac-only screen recording and video editing software that offers features like multi-channel audio mixing, iOS recording, and chroma key support. Pros of ScreenFlow include advanced editing options, while a con compared to Loom is the lack of real-time commenting features.
  6. Snagit: Snagit is a screen capture and recording tool that offers features like scrolling capture, markup tools, and GIF creation. Pros of Snagit include easy annotation options and customizable templates, while a con compared to Loom is the lack of video hosting and sharing capabilities.
  7. OBS Studio: OBS Studio is a free and open-source software for video recording and live streaming. Key features include custom transitions, filters, and support for multiple sources. Pros of OBS Studio include flexibility and customization options, while a con compared to Loom is the higher complexity for beginners.
  8. Screencast-O-Matic: Screencast-O-Matic is a simple screen recording tool that offers features like video editing, script recording, and hosting. Pros of Screencast-O-Matic include the easy-to-use interface, while a con compared to Loom is the limited customization options.
  9. Vidyard: Vidyard is a video hosting and analytics platform that also offers screen recording capabilities. Key features include personalized video messaging, lead generation, and integrations with CRM software. Pros of Vidyard include advanced analytics, while a con compared to Loom is the focus on marketing and sales rather than general communication.
  10. ScreenRec: ScreenRec is a lightweight screen recording tool with features like cloud storage, sharing links, and annotations. Pros of ScreenRec include the simple interface and quick recording options, while a con compared to Loom is the lack of editing tools.

Top Alternatives to Loom

  • BombBomb
    BombBomb

    It is a video email marketing platform that allows users to create and build relationships through video. Videos can be sent through email, text, or social media - letting you reach anyone you need to at any time. ...

  • Zoom
    Zoom

    Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems. ...

  • Vidyard
    Vidyard

    Vidyard is a powerful video analytics and hosting platform designed for content marketers. Get the most out of your video assets with in-depth data on viewer behaviour that can be automatically pushed into your marketing automation system and/or CRM. ...

  • CloudApp
    CloudApp

    Cloud-based visual communication technology. Used by developers, designers, and product managers to efficiently and effectively communicate complicated ideas across the globe with clarity and context. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Git
    Git

    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. ...

  • GitHub
    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

Loom alternatives & related posts

BombBomb logo

BombBomb

3
7
0
Record, send, & track simple video to stand out in your audience’s crowded inbox
3
7
+ 1
0
PROS OF BOMBBOMB
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF BOMBBOMB
      Be the first to leave a con

      related BombBomb posts

      Zoom logo

      Zoom

      1.7K
      1.9K
      155
      Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing
      1.7K
      1.9K
      + 1
      155
      PROS OF ZOOM
      • 25
        Web conferencing made easy
      • 16
        Remote control option
      • 13
        Draw on screen
      • 12
        Very reliable
      • 11
        In-meeting chat is pretty good
      • 9
        Free
      • 9
        Pair programming sessions with shared controls
      • 8
        Easy to share meeting links/invites
      • 7
        Good Sound Quality
      • 6
        Cloud recordings for meetings
      • 5
        Great mobile app
      • 4
        Virtual backgrounds
      • 4
        Recording Feature
      • 4
        Other people use it
      • 4
        User Friendly actions
      • 2
        Reactions (emoticons)
      • 2
        Auto reconnecting
      • 2
        Chrome extension is great to easily create meetings
      • 2
        While sharing screen, you can still see your video
      • 2
        Mute all participants at once
      • 2
        When ending the videocall, everybody gets kicked
      • 2
        Different options for blocking chat
      • 1
        Easily share video with audio
      • 1
        /zoom on Slack
      • 1
        Registration form
      • 1
        Meant for business and education
      • 0
        Zoom
      CONS OF ZOOM
      • 20
        Limited time if you are a basic member
      • 14
        Limited Storage
      • 11
        Hate how sharing your screen defaults to Full Screen
      • 10
        Quality isn't great (Free)
      • 9
        No cursor highlight on screenshare.
      • 8
        Potential security flaws
      • 7
        Onboarding process for new users is not intuitive
      • 5
        Virtual background quality isn't good
      • 5
        Security
      • 4
        Editing can be improved
      • 4
        Doesn't handle switching audio sources well
      • 4
        The native calendar is buggy
      • 4
        Dashboard can be improved
      • 3
        Pornographic material displayed
      • 3
        Any body can get in it
      • 3
        Not many emojis
      • 3
        Past chat history is not saved
      • 3
        Recording Feature
      • 3
        En In reality,the chat in the meet not is excelent,noo
      • 3
        Zoom lags a lot

      related Zoom posts

      Yogesh Bhondekar
      Product Manager | SaaS | Traveller · | 15 upvotes · 425.6K views

      Hi, I am building an enhanced web-conferencing app that will have a voice/video call, live chats, live notifications, live discussions, screen sharing, etc features. Ref: Zoom.

      I need advise finalizing the tech stack for this app. I am considering below tech stack:

      • Frontend: React
      • Backend: Node.js
      • Database: MongoDB
      • IAAS: #AWS
      • Containers & Orchestration: Docker / Kubernetes
      • DevOps: GitLab, Terraform
      • Brokers: Redis / RabbitMQ

      I need advice at the platform level as to what could be considered to support concurrent video streaming seamlessly.

      Also, please suggest what could be a better tech stack for my app?

      #SAAS #VideoConferencing #WebAndVideoConferencing #zoom #stack

      See more
      Yonas Beshawred

      Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

      You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

      Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

      #WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

      See more
      Vidyard logo

      Vidyard

      15
      15
      0
      Turn your video content into powerful marketing tools
      15
      15
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF VIDYARD
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF VIDYARD
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Vidyard posts

          CloudApp logo

          CloudApp

          22
          17
          0
          Create and share screen recordings, annotated screenshots, and GIFs.
          22
          17
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF CLOUDAPP
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF CLOUDAPP
              Be the first to leave a con

              related CloudApp posts

              Justin Dorfman
              Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 25K views

              I use CloudApp because it saves me so much time and energy. I use it at the very least once an hour. When Skitch was shutdown I thought my life was over! CloudApp saved the day and gave me features that Skitch didn't have.

              If you write a lot of technical content (or any content for that matter) it is an invaluable tool. I'm not sure about Windows support but it integrates flawlessly with macOS. 🤘

              See more
              JavaScript logo

              JavaScript

              353.1K
              268.6K
              8.1K
              Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
              353.1K
              268.6K
              + 1
              8.1K
              PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
              • 1.7K
                Can be used on frontend/backend
              • 1.5K
                It's everywhere
              • 1.2K
                Lots of great frameworks
              • 897
                Fast
              • 745
                Light weight
              • 425
                Flexible
              • 392
                You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
              • 286
                Non-blocking i/o
              • 237
                Ubiquitousness
              • 191
                Expressive
              • 55
                Extended functionality to web pages
              • 49
                Relatively easy language
              • 46
                Executed on the client side
              • 30
                Relatively fast to the end user
              • 25
                Pure Javascript
              • 21
                Functional programming
              • 15
                Async
              • 13
                Full-stack
              • 12
                Setup is easy
              • 12
                Future Language of The Web
              • 12
                Its everywhere
              • 11
                Because I love functions
              • 11
                JavaScript is the New PHP
              • 10
                Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
              • 9
                Expansive community
              • 9
                Everyone use it
              • 9
                Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
              • 9
                Easy
              • 8
                Most Popular Language in the World
              • 8
                Powerful
              • 8
                Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
              • 8
                For the good parts
              • 8
                No need to use PHP
              • 8
                Easy to hire developers
              • 7
                Agile, packages simple to use
              • 7
                Love-hate relationship
              • 7
                Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
              • 7
                Evolution of C
              • 7
                It's fun
              • 7
                Hard not to use
              • 7
                Versitile
              • 7
                Its fun and fast
              • 7
                Nice
              • 7
                Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
              • 7
                Supports lambdas and closures
              • 6
                It let's me use Babel & Typescript
              • 6
                Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
              • 6
                1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
              • 6
                Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
              • 6
                Easy to make something
              • 5
                Clojurescript
              • 5
                Promise relationship
              • 5
                Stockholm Syndrome
              • 5
                Function expressions are useful for callbacks
              • 5
                Scope manipulation
              • 5
                Everywhere
              • 5
                Client processing
              • 5
                What to add
              • 4
                Because it is so simple and lightweight
              • 4
                Only Programming language on browser
              • 1
                Test
              • 1
                Hard to learn
              • 1
                Test2
              • 1
                Not the best
              • 1
                Easy to understand
              • 1
                Subskill #4
              • 1
                Easy to learn
              • 0
                Hard 彤
              CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
              • 22
                A constant moving target, too much churn
              • 20
                Horribly inconsistent
              • 15
                Javascript is the New PHP
              • 9
                No ability to monitor memory utilitization
              • 8
                Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
              • 7
                Thinks strange results are better than errors
              • 6
                Can be ugly
              • 3
                No GitHub
              • 2
                Slow

              related JavaScript posts

              Zach Holman

              Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

              But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

              But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

              Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

              See more
              Conor Myhrvold
              Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.9M views

              How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

              Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

              Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

              https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

              (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

              Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

              See more
              Git logo

              Git

              292.1K
              175.1K
              6.6K
              Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
              292.1K
              175.1K
              + 1
              6.6K
              PROS OF GIT
              • 1.4K
                Distributed version control system
              • 1.1K
                Efficient branching and merging
              • 959
                Fast
              • 845
                Open source
              • 726
                Better than svn
              • 368
                Great command-line application
              • 306
                Simple
              • 291
                Free
              • 232
                Easy to use
              • 222
                Does not require server
              • 27
                Distributed
              • 22
                Small & Fast
              • 18
                Feature based workflow
              • 15
                Staging Area
              • 13
                Most wide-spread VSC
              • 11
                Role-based codelines
              • 11
                Disposable Experimentation
              • 7
                Frictionless Context Switching
              • 6
                Data Assurance
              • 5
                Efficient
              • 4
                Just awesome
              • 3
                Github integration
              • 3
                Easy branching and merging
              • 2
                Compatible
              • 2
                Flexible
              • 2
                Possible to lose history and commits
              • 1
                Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing
              • 1
                Light
              • 1
                Team Integration
              • 1
                Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
              • 1
                Easy
              • 1
                Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast
              • 1
                CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome
              • 1
                It's what you do
              • 0
                Phinx
              CONS OF GIT
              • 16
                Hard to learn
              • 11
                Inconsistent command line interface
              • 9
                Easy to lose uncommitted work
              • 7
                Worst documentation ever possibly made
              • 5
                Awful merge handling
              • 3
                Unexistent preventive security flows
              • 3
                Rebase hell
              • 2
                When --force is disabled, cannot rebase
              • 2
                Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly
              • 1
                Doesn't scale for big data

              related Git posts

              Simon Reymann
              Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 9.8M views

              Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

              • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
              • Respectively Git as revision control system
              • SourceTree as Git GUI
              • Visual Studio Code as IDE
              • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
              • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
              • SonarQube as quality gate
              • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
              • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
              • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
              • Heroku for deploying in test environments
              • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
              • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
              • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
              • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
              • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

              The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

              • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
              • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
              • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
              • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
              • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
              • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
              See more
              Tymoteusz Paul
              Devops guy at X20X Development LTD · | 23 upvotes · 8.8M views

              Often enough I have to explain my way of going about setting up a CI/CD pipeline with multiple deployment platforms. Since I am a bit tired of yapping the same every single time, I've decided to write it up and share with the world this way, and send people to read it instead ;). I will explain it on "live-example" of how the Rome got built, basing that current methodology exists only of readme.md and wishes of good luck (as it usually is ;)).

              It always starts with an app, whatever it may be and reading the readmes available while Vagrant and VirtualBox is installing and updating. Following that is the first hurdle to go over - convert all the instruction/scripts into Ansible playbook(s), and only stopping when doing a clear vagrant up or vagrant reload we will have a fully working environment. As our Vagrant environment is now functional, it's time to break it! This is the moment to look for how things can be done better (too rigid/too lose versioning? Sloppy environment setup?) and replace them with the right way to do stuff, one that won't bite us in the backside. This is the point, and the best opportunity, to upcycle the existing way of doing dev environment to produce a proper, production-grade product.

              I should probably digress here for a moment and explain why. I firmly believe that the way you deploy production is the same way you should deploy develop, shy of few debugging-friendly setting. This way you avoid the discrepancy between how production work vs how development works, which almost always causes major pains in the back of the neck, and with use of proper tools should mean no more work for the developers. That's why we start with Vagrant as developer boxes should be as easy as vagrant up, but the meat of our product lies in Ansible which will do meat of the work and can be applied to almost anything: AWS, bare metal, docker, LXC, in open net, behind vpn - you name it.

              We must also give proper consideration to monitoring and logging hoovering at this point. My generic answer here is to grab Elasticsearch, Kibana, and Logstash. While for different use cases there may be better solutions, this one is well battle-tested, performs reasonably and is very easy to scale both vertically (within some limits) and horizontally. Logstash rules are easy to write and are well supported in maintenance through Ansible, which as I've mentioned earlier, are at the very core of things, and creating triggers/reports and alerts based on Elastic and Kibana is generally a breeze, including some quite complex aggregations.

              If we are happy with the state of the Ansible it's time to move on and put all those roles and playbooks to work. Namely, we need something to manage our CI/CD pipelines. For me, the choice is obvious: TeamCity. It's modern, robust and unlike most of the light-weight alternatives, it's transparent. What I mean by that is that it doesn't tell you how to do things, doesn't limit your ways to deploy, or test, or package for that matter. Instead, it provides a developer-friendly and rich playground for your pipelines. You can do most the same with Jenkins, but it has a quite dated look and feel to it, while also missing some key functionality that must be brought in via plugins (like quality REST API which comes built-in with TeamCity). It also comes with all the common-handy plugins like Slack or Apache Maven integration.

              The exact flow between CI and CD varies too greatly from one application to another to describe, so I will outline a few rules that guide me in it: 1. Make build steps as small as possible. This way when something breaks, we know exactly where, without needing to dig and root around. 2. All security credentials besides development environment must be sources from individual Vault instances. Keys to those containers should exist only on the CI/CD box and accessible by a few people (the less the better). This is pretty self-explanatory, as anything besides dev may contain sensitive data and, at times, be public-facing. Because of that appropriate security must be present. TeamCity shines in this department with excellent secrets-management. 3. Every part of the build chain shall consume and produce artifacts. If it creates nothing, it likely shouldn't be its own build. This way if any issue shows up with any environment or version, all developer has to do it is grab appropriate artifacts to reproduce the issue locally. 4. Deployment builds should be directly tied to specific Git branches/tags. This enables much easier tracking of what caused an issue, including automated identifying and tagging the author (nothing like automated regression testing!).

              Speaking of deployments, I generally try to keep it simple but also with a close eye on the wallet. Because of that, I am more than happy with AWS or another cloud provider, but also constantly peeking at the loads and do we get the value of what we are paying for. Often enough the pattern of use is not constantly erratic, but rather has a firm baseline which could be migrated away from the cloud and into bare metal boxes. That is another part where this approach strongly triumphs over the common Docker and CircleCI setup, where you are very much tied in to use cloud providers and getting out is expensive. Here to embrace bare-metal hosting all you need is a help of some container-based self-hosting software, my personal preference is with Proxmox and LXC. Following that all you must write are ansible scripts to manage hardware of Proxmox, similar way as you do for Amazon EC2 (ansible supports both greatly) and you are good to go. One does not exclude another, quite the opposite, as they can live in great synergy and cut your costs dramatically (the heavier your base load, the bigger the savings) while providing production-grade resiliency.

              See more
              GitHub logo

              GitHub

              280.9K
              245.1K
              10.3K
              Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
              280.9K
              245.1K
              + 1
              10.3K
              PROS OF GITHUB
              • 1.8K
                Open source friendly
              • 1.5K
                Easy source control
              • 1.3K
                Nice UI
              • 1.1K
                Great for team collaboration
              • 867
                Easy setup
              • 504
                Issue tracker
              • 486
                Great community
              • 483
                Remote team collaboration
              • 451
                Great way to share
              • 442
                Pull request and features planning
              • 147
                Just works
              • 132
                Integrated in many tools
              • 121
                Free Public Repos
              • 116
                Github Gists
              • 112
                Github pages
              • 83
                Easy to find repos
              • 62
                Open source
              • 60
                It's free
              • 60
                Easy to find projects
              • 56
                Network effect
              • 49
                Extensive API
              • 43
                Organizations
              • 42
                Branching
              • 34
                Developer Profiles
              • 32
                Git Powered Wikis
              • 30
                Great for collaboration
              • 24
                It's fun
              • 23
                Clean interface and good integrations
              • 22
                Community SDK involvement
              • 20
                Learn from others source code
              • 16
                Because: Git
              • 14
                It integrates directly with Azure
              • 10
                Standard in Open Source collab
              • 10
                Newsfeed
              • 8
                It integrates directly with Hipchat
              • 8
                Fast
              • 8
                Beautiful user experience
              • 7
                Easy to discover new code libraries
              • 6
                Smooth integration
              • 6
                Cloud SCM
              • 6
                Nice API
              • 6
                Graphs
              • 6
                Integrations
              • 6
                It's awesome
              • 5
                Quick Onboarding
              • 5
                Reliable
              • 5
                Remarkable uptime
              • 5
                CI Integration
              • 5
                Hands down best online Git service available
              • 4
                Uses GIT
              • 4
                Version Control
              • 4
                Simple but powerful
              • 4
                Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
              • 4
                Free HTML hosting
              • 4
                Security options
              • 4
                Loved by developers
              • 4
                Easy to use and collaborate with others
              • 3
                Ci
              • 3
                IAM
              • 3
                Nice to use
              • 3
                Easy deployment via SSH
              • 2
                Easy to use
              • 2
                Leads the copycats
              • 2
                All in one development service
              • 2
                Free private repos
              • 2
                Free HTML hostings
              • 2
                Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
              • 2
                Beautiful
              • 2
                Easy source control and everything is backed up
              • 2
                IAM integration
              • 2
                Very Easy to Use
              • 2
                Good tools support
              • 2
                Issues tracker
              • 2
                Never dethroned
              • 2
                Self Hosted
              • 1
                Dasf
              • 1
                Profound
              CONS OF GITHUB
              • 54
                Owned by micrcosoft
              • 38
                Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
              • 15
                Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
              • 10
                API scoping could be better
              • 9
                Only 3 collaborators for private repos
              • 4
                Limited featureset for issue management
              • 3
                Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
              • 2
                GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
              • 1
                No multilingual interface
              • 1
                Takes a long time to commit
              • 1
                Expensive

              related GitHub posts

              Johnny Bell

              I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

              I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

              I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

              Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

              Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

              With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

              If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

              See more

              Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

              Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

              Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

              Check out the GitHub repo attached

              See more
              Python logo

              Python

              241K
              196.5K
              6.9K
              A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
              241K
              196.5K
              + 1
              6.9K
              PROS OF PYTHON
              • 1.2K
                Great libraries
              • 961
                Readable code
              • 846
                Beautiful code
              • 787
                Rapid development
              • 689
                Large community
              • 435
                Open source
              • 393
                Elegant
              • 282
                Great community
              • 272
                Object oriented
              • 220
                Dynamic typing
              • 77
                Great standard library
              • 59
                Very fast
              • 55
                Functional programming
              • 49
                Easy to learn
              • 45
                Scientific computing
              • 35
                Great documentation
              • 29
                Productivity
              • 28
                Easy to read
              • 28
                Matlab alternative
              • 23
                Simple is better than complex
              • 20
                It's the way I think
              • 19
                Imperative
              • 18
                Free
              • 18
                Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
              • 17
                Powerfull language
              • 17
                Machine learning support
              • 16
                Fast and simple
              • 14
                Scripting
              • 12
                Explicit is better than implicit
              • 11
                Ease of development
              • 10
                Clear and easy and powerfull
              • 9
                Unlimited power
              • 8
                It's lean and fun to code
              • 8
                Import antigravity
              • 7
                Print "life is short, use python"
              • 7
                Python has great libraries for data processing
              • 6
                Although practicality beats purity
              • 6
                Flat is better than nested
              • 6
                Great for tooling
              • 6
                Rapid Prototyping
              • 6
                Readability counts
              • 6
                High Documented language
              • 6
                I love snakes
              • 6
                Fast coding and good for competitions
              • 6
                There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
              • 6
                Now is better than never
              • 5
                Great for analytics
              • 5
                Lists, tuples, dictionaries
              • 4
                Easy to learn and use
              • 4
                Simple and easy to learn
              • 4
                Easy to setup and run smooth
              • 4
                Web scraping
              • 4
                CG industry needs
              • 4
                Socially engaged community
              • 4
                Complex is better than complicated
              • 4
                Multiple Inheritence
              • 4
                Beautiful is better than ugly
              • 4
                Plotting
              • 3
                If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
              • 3
                Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
              • 3
                Pip install everything
              • 3
                List comprehensions
              • 3
                No cruft
              • 3
                Generators
              • 3
                Import this
              • 3
                It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
              • 3
                Many types of collections
              • 3
                If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
              • 2
                Batteries included
              • 2
                Should START with this but not STICK with This
              • 2
                Powerful language for AI
              • 2
                Can understand easily who are new to programming
              • 2
                Flexible and easy
              • 2
                Good for hacking
              • 2
                A-to-Z
              • 2
                Because of Netflix
              • 2
                Only one way to do it
              • 2
                Better outcome
              • 1
                Sexy af
              • 1
                Slow
              • 1
                Securit
              • 0
                Ni
              • 0
                Powerful
              CONS OF PYTHON
              • 53
                Still divided between python 2 and python 3
              • 28
                Performance impact
              • 26
                Poor syntax for anonymous functions
              • 22
                GIL
              • 19
                Package management is a mess
              • 14
                Too imperative-oriented
              • 12
                Hard to understand
              • 12
                Dynamic typing
              • 12
                Very slow
              • 8
                Indentations matter a lot
              • 8
                Not everything is expression
              • 7
                Incredibly slow
              • 7
                Explicit self parameter in methods
              • 6
                Requires C functions for dynamic modules
              • 6
                Poor DSL capabilities
              • 6
                No anonymous functions
              • 5
                Fake object-oriented programming
              • 5
                Threading
              • 5
                The "lisp style" whitespaces
              • 5
                Official documentation is unclear.
              • 5
                Hard to obfuscate
              • 5
                Circular import
              • 4
                Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
              • 4
                The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
              • 4
                Not suitable for autocomplete
              • 2
                Meta classes
              • 1
                Training wheels (forced indentation)

              related Python posts

              Conor Myhrvold
              Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.9M views

              How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

              Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

              Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

              https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

              (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

              Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

              See more
              Nick Parsons
              Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 3.9M views

              Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

              We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

              We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

              Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

              #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

              See more