Alternatives to KeyDB logo

Alternatives to KeyDB

Redis, Hazelcast, Aerospike, SAP HANA, and Apache Ignite are the most popular alternatives and competitors to KeyDB.
20
46
+ 1
3

What is KeyDB and what are its top alternatives?

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.
KeyDB is a tool in the In-Memory Databases category of a tech stack.
KeyDB is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to KeyDB's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to KeyDB

  • Redis

    Redis

    Redis is an open source, BSD licensed, advanced key-value store. It is often referred to as a data structure server since keys can contain strings, hashes, lists, sets and sorted sets. ...

  • Hazelcast

    Hazelcast

    With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution. ...

  • Aerospike

    Aerospike

    Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees. ...

  • SAP HANA

    SAP HANA

    It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk. ...

  • Apache Ignite

    Apache Ignite

    It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale ...

  • MemSQL

    MemSQL

    MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines. ...

  • Azure Redis Cache

    Azure Redis Cache

    It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern. ...

  • Tarantool

    Tarantool

    It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications ...

KeyDB alternatives & related posts

Redis logo

Redis

44.1K
33.5K
3.9K
An in-memory database that persists on disk
44.1K
33.5K
+ 1
3.9K
PROS OF REDIS
  • 875
    Performance
  • 535
    Super fast
  • 511
    Ease of use
  • 441
    In-memory cache
  • 321
    Advanced key-value cache
  • 190
    Open source
  • 179
    Easy to deploy
  • 163
    Stable
  • 152
    Free
  • 120
    Fast
  • 40
    High-Performance
  • 39
    High Availability
  • 34
    Data Structures
  • 32
    Very Scalable
  • 23
    Replication
  • 20
    Great community
  • 19
    Pub/Sub
  • 17
    "NoSQL" key-value data store
  • 14
    Hashes
  • 12
    Sets
  • 10
    Sorted Sets
  • 9
    Lists
  • 8
    BSD licensed
  • 8
    NoSQL
  • 7
    Async replication
  • 7
    Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background
  • 7
    Bitmaps
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Keys with a limited time-to-live
  • 5
    Strings
  • 5
    Lua scripting
  • 4
    Awesomeness for Free!
  • 4
    Hyperloglogs
  • 3
    outstanding performance
  • 3
    Runs server side LUA
  • 3
    Networked
  • 3
    LRU eviction of keys
  • 3
    Written in ANSI C
  • 3
    Feature Rich
  • 3
    Transactions
  • 2
    Data structure server
  • 2
    Performance & ease of use
  • 1
    Existing Laravel Integration
  • 1
    Automatic failover
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Object [key/value] size each 500 MB
  • 1
    Simple
  • 1
    Channels concept
  • 1
    Scalable
  • 1
    Temporarily kept on disk
  • 1
    Dont save data if no subscribers are found
  • 0
    Jk
CONS OF REDIS
  • 14
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 2
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL

related Redis posts

Robert Zuber

We use MongoDB as our primary #datastore. Mongo's approach to replica sets enables some fantastic patterns for operations like maintenance, backups, and #ETL.

As we pull #microservices from our #monolith, we are taking the opportunity to build them with their own datastores using PostgreSQL. We also use Redis to cache data we’d never store permanently, and to rate-limit our requests to partners’ APIs (like GitHub).

When we’re dealing with large blobs of immutable data (logs, artifacts, and test results), we store them in Amazon S3. We handle any side-effects of S3’s eventual consistency model within our own code. This ensures that we deal with user requests correctly while writes are in process.

See more

I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis  for cache and other time sensitive operations.

We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

See more
Hazelcast logo

Hazelcast

249
375
56
Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java
249
375
+ 1
56
PROS OF HAZELCAST
  • 10
    High Availibility
  • 6
    Distributed Locking
  • 5
    Distributed compute
  • 5
    Sharding
  • 4
    Load balancing
  • 3
    Sql query support in cluster wide
  • 3
    Map-reduce functionality
  • 3
    Written in java. runs on jvm
  • 3
    Publish-subscribe
  • 2
    Performance
  • 2
    Simple-to-use
  • 2
    Multiple client language support
  • 2
    Rest interface
  • 2
    Optimis locking for map
  • 1
    Super Fast
  • 1
    Admin Interface (Management Center)
  • 1
    Better Documentation
  • 1
    Easy to use
CONS OF HAZELCAST
  • 3
    License needed for SSL

related Hazelcast posts

Aerospike logo

Aerospike

152
213
45
Flash-optimized in-memory open source NoSQL database
152
213
+ 1
45
PROS OF AEROSPIKE
  • 14
    Ram and/or ssd persistence
  • 11
    Easy clustering support
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Acid
  • 3
    Petabyte Scale
  • 3
    Scale
  • 3
    Performance better than Redis
  • 2
    Ease of use
CONS OF AEROSPIKE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Aerospike posts

    SAP HANA logo

    SAP HANA

    121
    98
    27
    An in-memory, column-oriented, relational database management system
    121
    98
    + 1
    27
    PROS OF SAP HANA
    • 5
      In-memory
    • 5
      SQL
    • 4
      Distributed
    • 4
      Performance
    • 2
      Realtime
    • 2
      Concurrent
    • 2
      OLAP
    • 2
      OLTP
    • 1
      JSON
    CONS OF SAP HANA
      Be the first to leave a con

      related SAP HANA posts

      Hi. We are planning to develop web, desktop, and mobile app for procurement, logistics, and contracts. Procure to Pay and Source to pay, spend management, supplier management, catalog management. ( similar to SAP Ariba, gap.com, coupa.com, ivalua.com vroozi.com, procurify.com

      We got stuck when deciding which technology stack is good for the future. We look forward to your kind guidance that will help us.

      We want to integrate with multiple databases with seamless bidirectional integration. What APIs and middleware available are best to achieve this? SAP HANA, Oracle, MySQL, MongoDB...

      ASP.NET / Node.js / Laravel. ......?

      Please guide us

      See more
      Apache Ignite logo

      Apache Ignite

      74
      121
      20
      An open-source distributed database, caching and processing platform
      74
      121
      + 1
      20
      PROS OF APACHE IGNITE
      • 3
        Written in java. runs on jvm
      • 3
        Free
      • 2
        High Avaliability
      • 2
        Rest interface
      • 2
        Sql query support in cluster wide
      • 2
        Multiple client language support
      • 2
        Load balancing
      • 1
        Easy to use
      • 1
        Better Documentation
      • 1
        Distributed compute
      • 1
        Distributed Locking
      CONS OF APACHE IGNITE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Apache Ignite posts

        MemSQL logo

        MemSQL

        73
        153
        20
        Database for real-time transactions and analytics.
        73
        153
        + 1
        20
        PROS OF MEMSQL
        • 7
          Distributed
        • 3
          Realtime
        • 2
          Sql
        • 2
          JSON
        • 2
          Concurrent
        • 2
          Columnstore
        • 1
          Scalable
        • 1
          Ultra fast
        CONS OF MEMSQL
          Be the first to leave a con

          related MemSQL posts

          Azure Redis Cache logo

          Azure Redis Cache

          48
          97
          2
          A fully managed, open source–compatible in-memory data store
          48
          97
          + 1
          2
          PROS OF AZURE REDIS CACHE
          • 1
            Cache-cluster
          • 1
            Redis
          CONS OF AZURE REDIS CACHE
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Azure Redis Cache posts

            Tarantool logo

            Tarantool

            28
            33
            9
            Free and open source an in-memory database and application server
            28
            33
            + 1
            9
            PROS OF TARANTOOL
            • 3
              Performance
            • 2
              Super fast
            • 2
              Open source
            • 1
              Advanced key-value cache
            • 1
              In-memory cache
            CONS OF TARANTOOL
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Tarantool posts