Alternatives to jQuery UI logo

Alternatives to jQuery UI

Bootstrap, jQuery, React, jQuery Mobile, and AngularJS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to jQuery UI.
35.1K
8.7K
+ 1
895

What is jQuery UI and what are its top alternatives?

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.
jQuery UI is a tool in the Javascript UI Libraries category of a tech stack.
jQuery UI is an open source tool with 10.9K GitHub stars and 5.3K GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to jQuery UI's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to jQuery UI

  • Bootstrap

    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • jQuery

    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • React

    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • jQuery Mobile

    jQuery Mobile

    jQuery Mobile is a HTML5-based user interface system designed to make responsive web sites and apps that are accessible on all smartphone, tablet and desktop devices. ...

  • AngularJS

    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML鈥檚 syntax to express your application鈥檚 components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Kendo UI

    Kendo UI

    Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution. ...

  • Vue.js

    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

  • jQWidgets

    jQWidgets

    It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery. ...

jQuery UI alternatives & related posts

Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

52.2K
11.4K
7.6K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
52.2K
11.4K
+ 1
7.6K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 777
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 466
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 410
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 241
    HTML framework
  • 76
    Popular
  • 75
    Mobile first
  • 75
    Easy setup
  • 56
    Great grid system
  • 49
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 27
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 13
    Grids
  • 8
    Clean
  • 7
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Love it
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Reactjs
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    Boostrap
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Easy setup2
  • 0
    Frefsd
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 25
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 14
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 8
    Verbose styles

related Bootstrap posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Module Lead | 18 upvotes 路 2.3M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Francisco Quintero
Tech Lead at Dev As Pros | 13 upvotes 路 697.3K views

For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

See more
jQuery logo

jQuery

161.8K
44.3K
6.5K
The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
161.8K
44.3K
+ 1
6.5K
PROS OF JQUERY
  • 1.3K
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 805
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
  • 457
    Easy
  • 395
    Popular
  • 350
    Feature-rich
  • 281
    Html5
  • 227
    Light weight
  • 91
    Simple
  • 84
    Great community
  • 79
    CSS3 Compliant
  • 69
    Mobile friendly
  • 67
    Fast
  • 43
    Intuitive
  • 42
    Swiss Army knife for webdev
  • 35
    Huge Community
  • 10
    Easy to learn
  • 3
    Clean code
  • 2
    Just awesome
  • 2
    Powerful
  • 2
    Nice
  • 2
    Because of Ajax request :)
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
  • 1
    It Just Works
  • 1
    Improves productivity
  • 1
    Industry acceptance
  • 1
    Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
  • 1
    Used everywhere
  • 1
    Widely Used
  • 0
    Javascript
CONS OF JQUERY
  • 5
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 4
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature

related jQuery posts

Kir Shatrov
Engineering Lead at Shopify | 20 upvotes 路 478.9K views

The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

#FrameworksFullStack #Languages

See more
Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Module Lead | 18 upvotes 路 2.3M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
React logo

React

98.4K
77.5K
3.8K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
98.4K
77.5K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF REACT
  • 751
    Components
  • 651
    Virtual dom
  • 558
    Performance
  • 484
    Simplicity
  • 436
    Composable
  • 174
    Data flow
  • 159
    Declarative
  • 123
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 113
    Reactive updates
  • 110
    Explicit app state
  • 31
    JSX
  • 23
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 18
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 16
    Easy to Use
  • 14
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 10
    Great perfomance
  • 8
    Built by Facebook
  • 6
    Javascript
  • 5
    TypeScript support
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Awesome
  • 4
    Easy to start
  • 4
    Feels like the 90s
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 3
    Functional
  • 3
    Server side views
  • 3
    Hooks
  • 3
    Fancy third party tools
  • 2
    Props
  • 2
    Simple
  • 2
    Has functional components
  • 2
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 2
    SSR
  • 2
    Fast evolving
  • 2
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 2
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 2
    Excellent Documentation
  • 2
    Rich ecosystem
  • 2
    Super easy
  • 2
    Has arrow functions
  • 2
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 2
    Scales super well
  • 2
    Just the View of MVC
  • 2
    Server Side Rendering
  • 2
    Cross-platform
  • 1
    Sharable
  • 1
    Start simple
  • 1
    Obama
  • 1
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 1
    Permissively-licensed
  • 1
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 1
    Fragments
  • 1
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 1
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 1
    Split your UI into components with one true state
CONS OF REACT
  • 32
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 20
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 19
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 6
    JSX
  • 6
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 1
    One-way binding only
  • 1
    State consistency with backend neglected

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert | 31 upvotes 路 1.5M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Johnny Bell
Software Engineer at Weedmaps | 26 upvotes 路 382.1K views
Shared insights
on
Vue.js
React

I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

See more
jQuery Mobile logo

jQuery Mobile

1.4K
285
0
Touch-Optimized Web Framework for Smartphones & Tablets
1.4K
285
+ 1
0
PROS OF JQUERY MOBILE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JQUERY MOBILE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related jQuery Mobile posts

      Ganesa Vijayakumar
      Full Stack Coder | Module Lead | 18 upvotes 路 2.3M views

      I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

      I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

      As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

      UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

      Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

      Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

      Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

      Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

      Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

      Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

      Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

      Thanks, Ganesa

      See more
      AngularJS logo

      AngularJS

      41.9K
      29.7K
      5.3K
      Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
      41.9K
      29.7K
      + 1
      5.3K
      PROS OF ANGULARJS
      • 886
        Quick to develop
      • 587
        Great mvc
      • 571
        Powerful
      • 522
        Restful
      • 504
        Backed by google
      • 349
        Two-way data binding
      • 344
        Javascript
      • 328
        Open source
      • 306
        Dependency injection
      • 198
        Readable
      • 76
        Fast
      • 65
        Directives
      • 64
        Great community
      • 57
        Free
      • 39
        Extend html vocabulary
      • 30
        Components
      • 26
        Easy to test
      • 25
        Easy to learn
      • 24
        Easy to templates
      • 24
        Great documentation
      • 22
        Easy to start
      • 18
        Awesome
      • 18
        Light weight
      • 15
        Angular 2.0
      • 15
        Javascript mvw framework
      • 14
        Great extensions
      • 14
        Efficient
      • 11
        Easy to prototype with
      • 9
        High performance
      • 9
        Coffeescript
      • 8
        Mvc
      • 8
        Two-way binding
      • 8
        Lots of community modules
      • 7
        Easy to e2e
      • 7
        Clean and keeps code readable
      • 6
        One of the best frameworks
      • 6
        Easy for small applications
      • 5
        Works great with jquery
      • 5
        Fast development
      • 3
        Hierarchical Data Structure
      • 3
        The two-way Data Binding is awesome
      • 3
        Community
      • 3
        Typescript
      • 3
        Declarative programming
      • 3
        I do not touch DOM
      • 3
        Be a developer, not a plumber.
      • 3
        Dart
      • 2
        Fkin awesome
      • 2
        Scopes
      • 2
        The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
      • 2
        Opinionated in the right areas
      • 2
        Supports api , easy development
      • 2
        Common Place
      • 2
        Amazing community support
      • 2
        Great
      • 2
        Very very useful and fast framework for development
      • 2
        Readable code
      • 2
        Programming fun again
      • 2
        Linear learning curve
      • 1
        Bot Ionescu
      • 1
        Acoperi葯ul 0757604335
      • 1
        Js
      • 1
        Google.com
      • 1
        Angular js
      • 1
        Http葯//Acoperi葯ul 0757604335
      • 1
        Shvzjn
      CONS OF ANGULARJS
      • 10
        Complex
      • 3
        Dependency injection
      • 2
        Learning Curve
      • 2
        Event Listener Overload
      • 1
        Hard to learn

      related AngularJS posts

      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH | 24 upvotes 路 1.7M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API鈥檚 resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH | 19 upvotes 路 575.1K views

      Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

      • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
      • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
      • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
      • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
      • Jest as testing framework
      • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
      • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

      The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

      • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
      • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
      • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
      • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
      • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
      • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
      See more
      Kendo UI logo

      Kendo UI

      249
      246
      22
      Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset
      249
      246
      + 1
      22
      PROS OF KENDO UI
      • 11
        Collection of controls
      • 4
        Mobile
      • 3
        Multi-framework support
      • 2
        Speed
      • 1
        Built-in router
      • 1
        AngularJS
      CONS OF KENDO UI
      • 4
        Massive footprint
      • 3
        Slow
      • 1
        Poor customizability
      • 1
        Spotty Documentation

      related Kendo UI posts

      Doug Pet
      Shared insights
      on
      Kendo UI
      React

      We are transitioning to develop a web app, and we have selected to use React for our front end. I've looked at Kendo UI as a tool to help out. I am looking for some feedback on the Kendo UI tool and any others that are good. The desktop software that we are replacing has about 150 forms. The app is currently only going to be used inhouse and is connected to SQL server. Thanks in advance!

      See more
      Vue.js logo

      Vue.js

      33.5K
      25.9K
      1.3K
      A progressive framework for building user interfaces
      33.5K
      25.9K
      + 1
      1.3K
      PROS OF VUE.JS
      • 264
        Simple and easy to start with
      • 206
        Good documentation
      • 178
        Components
      • 117
        Simple the best
      • 95
        Simplified AngularJS
      • 75
        Reactive
      • 65
        Intuitive APIs
      • 47
        Javascript
      • 41
        Changed my front end coding life
      • 36
        Configuration is smooth
      • 26
        Easy to learn
      • 21
        So much fun to use
      • 18
        Progressive
      • 16
        Virtual dom
      • 11
        Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
      • 8
        It's magic
      • 8
        Best of Both Worlds
      • 7
        Without misleading licenses
      • 7
        Application structure
      • 7
        Elegant design
      • 7
        Perfomance
      • 7
        Component is template, javascript and style in one
      • 6
        Intuitive and easy to use
      • 5
        Light Weight
      • 4
        Good command line interface
      • 4
        Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
      • 3
        Small learning curve
      • 3
        Like Angular only quicker to get started with
      • 2
        Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
      • 2
        Component based
      • 2
        Concise error messages
      • 2
        Logicless templates
      • 2
        Supports several template languages
      • 2
        High performance
      • 2
        Customer Render ending eg to HTML
      • 2
        One-way data flow
      • 2
        Single file components
      • 2
        Intuitive
      • 2
        Lots of documentation
      • 1
        GUI
      CONS OF VUE.JS
      • 6
        Less Common Place
      • 3
        YXMLvsHTML Markup
      • 1
        Don't support fragments
      • 1
        Only support programatically multiple root nodes

      related Vue.js posts

      Johnny Bell
      Software Engineer at Weedmaps | 26 upvotes 路 382.1K views
      Shared insights
      on
      Vue.js
      React

      I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

      It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      Vue.js
      React

      I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

      See more
      jQWidgets logo

      jQWidgets

      7
      30
      0
      HTML5 UI Widgets Framework
      7
      30
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF JQWIDGETS
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF JQWIDGETS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related jQWidgets posts