Alternatives to Insomnia REST Client logo

Alternatives to Insomnia REST Client

Postman, OpenAPI, Retrofit, OpenAPI Specification, and Apigee are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Insomnia REST Client.
775
640
+ 1
44

What is Insomnia REST Client and what are its top alternatives?

Insomnia REST Client is a popular REST client tool that allows developers to easily test and debug APIs. It supports various HTTP methods, authentication types, and request/response customization. However, its free version has limited support for features like advanced authentication methods and data import/export capabilities.

  1. Postman: Postman is a widely-used collaboration platform for API development with features like advanced request building, automated testing, and monitoring capabilities. Pros include a user-friendly interface and extensive documentation, while cons may include a steeper learning curve compared to Insomnia.
  2. Paw: Paw is a convenient API testing tool specifically designed for Mac users with features like dynamic values, headers & cookies, and automation with JavaScript. Pros include native macOS support and a visual editor, while cons may include a higher price point for the full version.
  3. SoapUI: SoapUI is an open-source API testing tool that supports SOAP and REST services with features like drag-and-drop building, assertion testing, and data-driven testing capabilities. Pros include cross-platform compatibility and robust automation, while cons may include a less intuitive interface for beginners.
  4. Swagger: Swagger is a popular open-source framework that allows developers to design, build, and document APIs with features like code generation, interactive API documentation, and testing capabilities. Pros include strong community support and extensive integrations, while cons may include a steep learning curve for beginners.
  5. Restlet Client: Restlet Client is a lightweight API testing tool with features like request chaining, scripting support, and OAuth integration. Pros include a free version with essential features and a user-friendly interface, while cons may include limited customization options compared to Insomnia.
  6. Httpie: Httpie is a command-line HTTP client with a simple syntax for making HTTP requests and debugging APIs. Pros include easy installation and usage, while cons may include limited GUI capabilities for users who prefer a visual interface like Insomnia.
  7. RestAssured: RestAssured is a Java-based library for testing and validating RESTful web services with features like fluent syntax, JSON/XML validation, and support for HTTP methods. Pros include seamless integration with JUnit/TestNG frameworks and easy configuration, while cons may include a dependency on Java programming knowledge.
  8. Karate DSL: Karate DSL is an open-source API testing framework based on Cucumber that allows users to write tests in natural language with a focus on readability and reusability. Pros include built-in test reports and parallel execution, while cons may include a learning curve for users unfamiliar with BDD testing.
  9. Insomnia Designer: Insomnia Designer is an API design and testing tool that offers collaborative workflow features, mock server integration, and design documentation capabilities. Pros include seamless integration with the Insomnia REST Client and flexible project management, while cons may include a higher price point for advanced features.
  10. HTTP Toolkit: HTTP Toolkit is a powerful tool for testing, debugging, and mocking HTTP(S) traffic with features like live request editing, SSL interception, and traffic visualization. Pros include versatility for web development and a user-friendly interface, while cons may include a focus on network traffic analysis rather than pure API testing.

Top Alternatives to Insomnia REST Client

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • OpenAPI
    OpenAPI

    It is a publicly available application programming interface that provides developers with programmatic access to a proprietary software application or web service. ...

  • Retrofit
    Retrofit

    Retrofit turns your HTTP API into a Java interface

  • OpenAPI Specification
    OpenAPI Specification

    It defines a standard, language-agnostic interface to RESTful APIs which allows both humans and computers to discover and understand the capabilities of the service without access to source code, documentation, or through network traffic inspection. ...

  • Apigee
    Apigee

    API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world. ...

  • Soap UI
    Soap UI

    It is an open source functional Testing tool for API Testing. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS, AMF and JDBC. It supports functional tests, security tests, and virtualization. ...

  • Paw
    Paw

    Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code. ...

  • Swagger Codegen
    Swagger Codegen

    It is an open source project which allows generation of API client libraries (SDK generation), server stubs, and documentation automatically from an OpenAPI Specification. ...

Insomnia REST Client alternatives & related posts

Postman logo

Postman

92.4K
79.1K
1.8K
Only complete API development environment
92.4K
79.1K
+ 1
1.8K
PROS OF POSTMAN
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 53
    History feature
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 43
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 35
    The best in class app
  • 12
    Can save and share script
  • 10
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 8
    Collections
  • 8
    Option to run scrips
  • 8
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 7
    Shareable Collections
  • 7
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 7
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 6
    Great integration with newman
  • 5
    Documentation
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Saves responses
  • 4
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 4
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 4
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    API-network
  • 3
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 3
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 2
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 2
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 2
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 2
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 2
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 2
    Runner
  • 2
    Graph
  • 1
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
CONS OF POSTMAN
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 3
    Not free after 5 users
  • 3
    Can't prompt for per-request variables
  • 1
    Import swagger
  • 1
    Support websocket
  • 1
    Import curl

related Postman posts

Noah Zoschke
Engineering Manager at Segment ¡ | 30 upvotes ¡ 2.7M views

We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH ¡ | 27 upvotes ¡ 4.7M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
OpenAPI logo

OpenAPI

624
438
6
Allows the owner of a network-accessible service to give universal access
624
438
+ 1
6
PROS OF OPENAPI
  • 1
    Easy to read the template generated
  • 1
    The most popular api spec
  • 1
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Supports versioning
  • 1
    Supports authentication
  • 1
    Supports caching
CONS OF OPENAPI
    Be the first to leave a con

    related OpenAPI posts

    Joshua Dean KĂźpper
    CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) ¡ | 4 upvotes ¡ 472.8K views

    We use Swagger Inspector in conjunction with our universal REST-API "Charon". Swagger Inspector makes testing edge-cases hassle-free and lets testing look easy. Swagger Inspector was also a great help to explore the Mojang-API, that we are dependent on, because it is the central repository for minecraft-account-data.

    We previously used Postman but decided to switch over to Swagger Inspector because it also integrated seamlessly into Swagger UI, which we use for displaying our OpenAPI specification of said REST-API.

    See more
    Retrofit logo

    Retrofit

    317
    197
    0
    A type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java
    317
    197
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF RETROFIT
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF RETROFIT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Retrofit posts

        OpenAPI Specification logo

        OpenAPI Specification

        247
        145
        10
        An API description format for REST APIs
        247
        145
        + 1
        10
        PROS OF OPENAPI SPECIFICATION
        • 5
          API Documentation
        • 5
          API Specification
        CONS OF OPENAPI SPECIFICATION
          Be the first to leave a con

          related OpenAPI Specification posts

          Apigee logo

          Apigee

          234
          686
          30
          Intelligent and complete API platform
          234
          686
          + 1
          30
          PROS OF APIGEE
          • 12
            Highly scalable and secure API Management Platform
          • 6
            Good documentation
          • 6
            Quick jumpstart
          • 3
            Fast and adjustable caching
          • 3
            Easy to use
          CONS OF APIGEE
          • 11
            Expensive
          • 1
            Doesn't support hybrid natively

          related Apigee posts

          Soap UI logo

          Soap UI

          229
          151
          3
          An open source SOAP and REST API testing tool
          229
          151
          + 1
          3
          PROS OF SOAP UI
          • 3
            Open source
          CONS OF SOAP UI
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Soap UI posts

            Paw logo

            Paw

            228
            276
            164
            The ultimate REST client for Mac
            228
            276
            + 1
            164
            PROS OF PAW
            • 46
              Great interface
            • 37
              Easy to use
            • 25
              More stable and performant than the others
            • 16
              Saves endpoints list for testing
            • 13
              Supports environment variables
            • 12
              Integrations
            • 9
              Multi-Dimension Environment Settings
            • 4
              Paste curl commands into Paw
            • 2
              Creates code for any language or framework
            CONS OF PAW
            • 3
              It's not free
            • 2
              MacOS Only

            related Paw posts

            Jason Barry
            Cofounder at FeaturePeek ¡ | 4 upvotes ¡ 2.4M views

            We've tried a couple REST clients over the years, and Insomnia REST Client has won us over the most. Here's what we like about it compared to other contenders in this category:

            • Uncluttered UI. Things are only in your face when you need them, and the app is visually organized in an intuitive manner.
            • Native Mac app. We wanted the look and feel to be on par with other apps in our OS rather than a web app / Electron app (cough Postman).
            • Easy team sync. Other apps have this too, but Insomnia's model best sets the "set and forget" mentality. Syncs are near instant and I'm always assured that I'm working on the latest version of API endpoints. Apps like Paw use a git-based approach to revision history, but I think this actually over-complicates the sync feature. For ensuring I'm always working on the latest version of something, I'd rather have the sync model be closer to Dropbox's than git's, and Insomnia is closer to Dropbox in that regard.

            Some features like automatic public-facing documentation aren't supported, but we currently don't have any public APIs, so this didn't matter to us.

            See more
            Swagger Codegen logo

            Swagger Codegen

            184
            160
            1
            Generate API clients or server stubs for REST API
            184
            160
            + 1
            1
            PROS OF SWAGGER CODEGEN
            • 1
              SDK Generation
            CONS OF SWAGGER CODEGEN
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Swagger Codegen posts