Alternatives to Element logo

Alternatives to Element

Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Lightroom, Atom, Component, and Electron are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Element.
63
90
+ 1
3

What is Element and what are its top alternatives?

Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources.
Element is a tool in the Cross-Platform Desktop Development category of a tech stack.
Element is an open source tool with 53.2K GitHub stars and 14.5K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Element's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Element

  • Adobe Photoshop
    Adobe Photoshop

    It is the best in the world of graphic design and image processing software that will realize any of your ideas. Create and enhance photos, illustrations and 3D graphic objects. ...

  • Adobe Lightroom
    Adobe Lightroom

    It is a cloud-based service for people who love photography, it gives you everything you need to edit, organize, store, and share your photos across desktop, mobile, and web. ...

  • Atom
    Atom

    At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it. ...

  • Component
    Component

    Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app. ...

  • Electron
    Electron

    With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor. ...

  • JavaFX
    JavaFX

    It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms. ...

  • Qt5
    Qt5

    It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms. ...

  • pygame
    pygame

    It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language. ...

Element alternatives & related posts

Adobe Photoshop logo

Adobe Photoshop

2.1K
1.4K
56
The industry standard in design, photography, video editing & more
2.1K
1.4K
+ 1
56
PROS OF ADOBE PHOTOSHOP
  • 14
    Photo editing
  • 14
    Powerful
  • 11
    Layers
  • 7
    You can use it for anything related to graphics
  • 4
    Magic wand
  • 2
    Pen Tool
  • 2
    Easy to crack
  • 2
    Raster-based Image Editing Software
CONS OF ADOBE PHOTOSHOP
  • 4
    Heavyweight
  • 3
    Memory hungry
  • 2
    Steep learning curve

related Adobe Photoshop posts

Adobe Lightroom logo

Adobe Lightroom

225
162
0
Image organization and image manipulation software
225
162
+ 1
0
PROS OF ADOBE LIGHTROOM
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF ADOBE LIGHTROOM
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Adobe Lightroom posts

      Atom logo

      Atom

      16K
      13.8K
      2.7K
      A hackable text editor for the 21st Century
      16K
      13.8K
      + 1
      2.7K
      PROS OF ATOM
      • 528
        Free
      • 447
        Open source
      • 342
        Modular design
      • 320
        Hackable
      • 316
        Beautiful UI
      • 170
        Github integration
      • 147
        Backed by github
      • 119
        Built with node.js
      • 113
        Web native
      • 107
        Community
      • 35
        Packages
      • 18
        Cross platform
      • 5
        TypeScript editor
      • 5
        Nice UI
      • 5
        Multicursor support
      • 3
        cli start
      • 3
        Chrome Inspector works IN EDITOR
      • 3
        Simple but powerful
      • 3
        Open source, lots of packages, and so configurable
      • 3
        Snippets
      • 2
        It's powerful
      • 2
        Code readability
      • 2
        Awesome
      • 2
        Smart TypeScript code completion
      • 2
        Well documented
      • 1
        "Free", "Hackable", "Open Source", The Awesomness
      • 1
        Apm publish minor
      • 1
        works with GitLab
      • 1
        full support
      • 1
        vim support
      • 1
        Split-Tab Layout
      • 1
        Consistent UI on all platforms
      • 1
        User friendly
      • 1
        Hackable and Open Source
      • 0
        Publish
      CONS OF ATOM
      • 19
        Slow with large files
      • 7
        Slow startup
      • 2
        Most of the time packages are hard to find.
      • 1
        No longer maintained
      • 1
        Cannot Run code with F5
      • 1
        Can be easily Modified

      related Atom posts

      Jerome Dalbert
      Principal Backend Software Engineer at StackShare · | 13 upvotes · 726.3K views

      I liked Sublime Text for its speed, simplicity and keyboard shortcuts which synergize well when working on scripting languages like Ruby and JavaScript. I extended the editor with custom Python scripts that improved keyboard navigability such as autofocusing the sidebar when no files are open, or changing tab closing behavior.

      But customization can only get you so far, and there were little things that I still had to use the mouse for, such as scrolling, repositioning lines on the screen, selecting the line number of a failing test stack trace from a separate plugin pane, etc. After 3 years of wearily moving my arm and hand to perform the same repetitive tasks, I decided to switch to Vim for 3 reasons:

      • your fingers literally don’t ever need to leave the keyboard home row (I had to remap the escape key though)
      • it is a reliable tool that has been around for more than 30 years and will still be around for the next 30 years
      • I wanted to "look like a hacker" by doing everything inside my terminal and by becoming a better Unix citizen

      The learning curve is very steep and it took me a year to master it, but investing time to be truly comfortable with my #TextEditor was more than worth it. To me, Vim comes close to being the perfect editor and I probably won’t need to switch ever again. It feels good to ignore new editors that come out every few years, like Atom and Visual Studio Code.

      See more
      Julian Sanchez
      Lead Developer at Chore Champion · | 9 upvotes · 577.8K views

      We use Visual Studio Code because it allows us to easily and quickly integrate with Git, much like Sublime Merge ,but it is integrated into the IDE. Another cool part about VS Code is the ability collaborate with each other with Visual Studio Live Share which allows our whole team to get more done together. It brings the convenience of the Google Suite to programming, offering something that works more smoothly than anything found on Atom or Sublime Text

      See more
      Component logo

      Component

      160
      96
      20
      Client package management for building better web applications
      160
      96
      + 1
      20
      PROS OF COMPONENT
      • 20
        Open source
      CONS OF COMPONENT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Component posts

        Electron logo

        Electron

        9.9K
        9.1K
        140
        Build cross platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS
        9.9K
        9.1K
        + 1
        140
        PROS OF ELECTRON
        • 66
          Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
        • 51
          Open source
        • 13
          Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
        • 7
          Because it's cross platform
        • 3
          Use Node.js in the Main Process
        CONS OF ELECTRON
        • 18
          Uses a lot of memory
        • 8
          User experience never as good as a native app
        • 4
          No proper documentation
        • 4
          Does not native
        • 1
          Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
        • 1
          Wrong reference for dom inspection

        related Electron posts

        The Slack desktop app was originally written us the MacGap framework, which used Apple’s WebView to host web content inside of a native app frame. As this approach continued to present product limitations, Slack decided to migrate the desktop app to Electron. Electron is a platform that combines the rendering engine from Chromium and the Node.js runtime and module system. The desktop app is written as a modern ES6 + async/await React application.

        For the desktop app, Slack takes a hybrid approach, wherein some of the assets ship as part of the app, but most of their assets and code are loaded remotely.

        See more

        Slack's new desktop application was launched for macOS. It was built using Electron for a faster, frameless look with a host of background improvements for a superior Slack experience. Instead of adopting a complete-in-box approach taken by other apps, Slack prefers a hybrid approach where some of the assets are loaded as part of the app, while others are made available remotely. Slack's original desktop app was written using the MacGap v1 framework using WebView to host web content within the native app frame. But it was difficult to upgrade with new features only available to Apple's WKWebView and moving to this view called for a total application rewrite.

        Electron brings together Chromium's rendering engine with the Node.js runtime and module system. The new desktop app is now based on an ES6 + async/await React application is currently being moved gradually to TypeScript. Electron functions on Chromium's multi-process model, with each Slack team signed into a separate process and memory space. It also helps prevent remote content to directly access desktop features using a feature called WebView Element which creates a fresh Chromium renderer process and assigns rendering of content for its hosting renderer. Additional security can be ensured by preventing Node.js modules from leaking into the API surface and watching out for APIs with file paths. Communication between processes on Electron is carried out via electron-remote, a pared-down, zippy version of Electron's remote module, which makes implementing the web apps UI much easier.

        See more
        JavaFX logo

        JavaFX

        261
        373
        10
        A Java library for building Rich Internet Applications
        261
        373
        + 1
        10
        PROS OF JAVAFX
        • 10
          Light
        CONS OF JAVAFX
        • 1
          Community support less than qt
        • 1
          Complicated

        related JavaFX posts

        Qt5 logo

        Qt5

        89
        128
        6
        A free and open-source widget toolkit
        89
        128
        + 1
        6
        PROS OF QT5
        • 1
          Fast enough
        • 1
          Very good documentation
        • 1
          C++
        • 1
          Open source
        • 1
          Cross platform
        • 1
          Easy to learn and use
        CONS OF QT5
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Qt5 posts

          pygame logo

          pygame

          80
          150
          5
          Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications
          80
          150
          + 1
          5
          PROS OF PYGAME
          • 3
            Easy to install
          • 1
            Simple
          • 1
            Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
          CONS OF PYGAME
          • 2
            Has only 2d
          • 1
            Slow

          related pygame posts