Alternatives to DevExtreme logo

Alternatives to DevExtreme

Kendo UI, Angular Material , PrimeNg, Bootstrap, and Material-UI are the most popular alternatives and competitors to DevExtreme.
89
199
+ 1
0

What is DevExtreme and what are its top alternatives?

DevExtreme is a comprehensive set of JavaScript-based UI widgets that are designed to help developers create highly responsive and visually stunning web applications. Some key features of DevExtreme include a wide range of ready-to-use UI components, support for Angular, React, and Vue frameworks, data visualization tools, and built-in theming capabilities. However, one limitation of DevExtreme is the relatively high cost for commercial usage.

  1. Kendo UI: Kendo UI is a popular JavaScript UI component library that offers a wide range of widgets and features, including templates, data binding, and mobile support. Pros: extensive documentation, rich set of components. Cons: high price for commercial licensing.
  2. Syncfusion Essential Studio: Syncfusion Essential Studio provides a wide range of UI components for web, mobile, and desktop applications, with support for multiple frameworks. Pros: large selection of components, great customer support. Cons: requires a paid license for extended use.
  3. PrimeNG: PrimeNG is a collection of rich UI components for Angular applications, offering features like data tables, charts, and form elements. Pros: open-source, regularly updated components. Cons: limited support for other frameworks.
  4. Material-UI: Material-UI is a React component library that follows Google's Material Design guidelines, providing a set of pre-built components for creating modern web applications. Pros: easy integration with React, customizable themes. Cons: limited components compared to other libraries.
  5. Ant Design: Ant Design is a popular UI library for React applications that offers a comprehensive set of components with a focus on design consistency and usability. Pros: detailed documentation, internationalization support. Cons: complex customization process for some components.
  6. Element UI: Element UI is a Vue.js component library that provides a set of high-quality components for building responsive web applications. Pros: lightweight library, consistent design language. Cons: limited customization options for some components.
  7. Bootstrap: Bootstrap is a widely used front-end framework that offers a collection of CSS and JavaScript components for building responsive websites. Pros: extensive community support, easy to get started. Cons: limited customization options compared to other libraries.
  8. React-Bootstrap: React-Bootstrap is a library of Bootstrap components re-implemented for React, allowing developers to easily integrate Bootstrap's CSS styling into their React applications. Pros: seamless integration with React, familiar Bootstrap syntax. Cons: limited components compared to the original Bootstrap library.
  9. Semantic UI: Semantic UI is a front-end development framework that uses human-friendly HTML to create visually appealing websites, with a focus on clean design and responsive layouts. Pros: clean and intuitive syntax, customizable theming options. Cons: limited components compared to other libraries.
  10. Onsen UI: Onsen UI is an open-source hybrid mobile app development framework that provides a set of UI components for creating native-like mobile applications using HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. Pros: support for both Angular and React, efficient performance. Cons: limited customization options for some components.

Top Alternatives to DevExtreme

  • Kendo UI
    Kendo UI

    Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution. ...

  • Angular Material
    Angular Material

    Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy. ...

  • PrimeNg
    PrimeNg

    It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements. ...

  • Bootstrap
    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • Material-UI
    Material-UI

    Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design. ...

  • Ionicons
    Ionicons

    Premium designed icons for use in web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps. Support for SVG and web font. Completely open source and MIT licensed. ...

  • Ant Design
    Ant Design

    An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework. ...

  • Chakra UI
    Chakra UI

    It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications. ...

DevExtreme alternatives & related posts

Kendo UI logo

Kendo UI

286
356
33
Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset
286
356
+ 1
33
PROS OF KENDO UI
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 2
    AngularJS
  • 2
    Built-in router
  • 1
    Good Documentation
CONS OF KENDO UI
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Awdawd
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 1
    Poor customizability

related Kendo UI posts

Doug Pet
Shared insights
on
Kendo UIKendo UIReactReact

We are transitioning to develop a web app, and we have selected to use React for our front end. I've looked at Kendo UI as a tool to help out. I am looking for some feedback on the Kendo UI tool and any others that are good. The desktop software that we are replacing has about 150 forms. The app is currently only going to be used inhouse and is connected to SQL server. Thanks in advance!

See more
Angular Material  logo

Angular Material

620
748
32
Easy to use material design for angular
620
748
+ 1
32
PROS OF ANGULAR MATERIAL
  • 12
    Components
  • 8
    Backed by a well known company
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Rte
  • 1
    Implements well known material design
CONS OF ANGULAR MATERIAL
  • 4
    Fairly large
  • 1
    Look like 90s stuffs
  • 1
    Shit
  • 1
    Suck

related Angular Material posts

PrimeNg logo

PrimeNg

144
279
15
A collection of rich UI components for Angular
144
279
+ 1
15
PROS OF PRIMENG
  • 6
    Complete
  • 4
    Wide range of components
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Already 17+ version up
  • 1
    Modern UI components that work across the web
CONS OF PRIMENG
  • 4
    Components are hard to customize
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Need to buy themes
  • 2
    Hard to understand
  • 2
    No documentation
  • 2
    Functionality differs for all components

related PrimeNg posts

I am a novice to AngularJS, but I have a strong web development background. I need help with the pros and cons of choosing the Angular Material or PrimeNg for our new application. Our new application will be using Angular for the front-end and .NET Core for the Web API. I looked at both tools and leaned toward Angular Material. It would be beneficial if I could obtain some expert advice from the community.

See more
Shared insights
on
BootstrapBootstrapPrimeNgPrimeNgAngularJSAngularJS

We are building a PWA using AngularJS targeting Mobiles, Tablets, Laptops and Desktops. Like for smaller to larger screens. This is our first PWA and my first project in Angular. We are confused between PrimeNg and Bootstrap. I read in an article that PrimeNg has got Bootstrap implemented in it from 5.x.x version. Which is the best Framework for this?

See more
Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

55.3K
13K
7.7K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
55.3K
13K
+ 1
7.7K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 472
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 411
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 242
    HTML framework
  • 77
    Easy setup
  • 77
    Mobile first
  • 77
    Popular
  • 58
    Great grid system
  • 52
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 28
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 14
    Grids
  • 9
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 8
    Clean
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Love it
  • 3
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Boostrap
  • 2
    Devin schumacher rules
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    Poop
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Easy setup2
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
  • 1
    Super heavy

related Bootstrap posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 4.5M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Francisco Quintero
Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1.6M views

For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

See more
Material-UI logo

Material-UI

2.2K
3.6K
441
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.
2.2K
3.6K
+ 1
441
PROS OF MATERIAL-UI
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 25
    Component
  • 14
    Looks great
  • 12
    Responsive
  • 12
    Good documentation
  • 9
    LESS
  • 8
    Ui component
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Code examples
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    JSS
  • 3
    Angular
  • 3
    Very accessible
  • 3
    Fun
  • 3
    Supports old browsers out of the box
  • 2
    Typescript support
  • 2
    # of components
  • 2
    Interface
  • 2
    Designed for Server Side Rendering
  • 1
    Support for multiple styling systems
  • 1
    Css
  • 1
    Easy to work with
  • 1
    Accessibility
CONS OF MATERIAL-UI
  • 35
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 28
    Hard to customize
  • 21
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 8
    Bad performance
  • 7
    Extra library needed for date/time pickers
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
  • 2
    Typescript Support
  • 1
    # of components

related Material-UI posts

Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 30 upvotes · 3.3M views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more

My React website is a simple 5-pager that attaches to a database to store and display registrations and other data. The user (small user base) can change any form elements, but I don't need theme-ing, though that would be fun for the user. reactstrap/react-bootstrap built on Bootstrap 4 sounds dated. I am familiar with reactstrap, but a friend said to try Material-UI. The thought of learning it is interesting, but somehow I think it might be overkill. So... reactstrap, react-bootstrap, or Material UI, which should I use?

See more
Ionicons logo

Ionicons

1.3K
68
5
Beautifully crafted open source icons
1.3K
68
+ 1
5
PROS OF IONICONS
  • 2
    Ui Components
  • 2
    Icons
  • 1
    Looks Amazing
CONS OF IONICONS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Ionicons posts

    Ant Design logo

    Ant Design

    1.1K
    1.7K
    221
    A set of high-quality React components
    1.1K
    1.7K
    + 1
    221
    PROS OF ANT DESIGN
    • 47
      Lots of components
    • 33
      Polished and enterprisey look and feel
    • 21
      TypeScript
    • 20
      Easy to integrate
    • 18
      Es6 support
    • 17
      Typescript support
    • 17
      Beautiful and solid
    • 16
      Beautifully Animated Components
    • 15
      Quick Release rhythm
    • 14
      Great documentation
    • 2
      Easy to customize Forms
    • 1
      Opensource and free of cost
    CONS OF ANT DESIGN
    • 24
      Less
    • 10
      Large File Size
    • 4
      Poor accessibility support
    • 3
      Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries

    related Ant Design posts

    Sarmad Chaudhary
    Founder & CEO at Ebiz Ltd. · | 9 upvotes · 1.3M views

    Hi there!

    I just want to have a simple poll/vote...

    If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:

    1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.

    2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.

    Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)

    See more

    Hello, A question to frontend developers. I am a beginner on frontend.

    I am building a UI for my company to replace old legacy one with React and this question is about choosing how to apply design to it.

    I have Tailwind CSS on one hand and Ant Design on the other (I didnt like mui and Bootstrap doesn't seem to have enterprise components as ant) As far as I understand, tailwind is great. It allows me to literally build an application without touching the css but I have to build my own react components with it. Ant design or mantine has ready to use components which I can use and rapidly build my application.

    My question is, is it the right approach to: - Use a component framework for now and replace legacy app. - Introduce tailwind later when I have a frontend resource in hand and then build own component library

    Thank you.

    See more
    Chakra UI logo

    Chakra UI

    202
    290
    18
    Modular and accessible UI components for React apps
    202
    290
    + 1
    18
    PROS OF CHAKRA UI
    • 7
      Typescript Support
    • 4
      Accessibility
    • 4
      Responsiveness
    • 3
      Good documentation
    CONS OF CHAKRA UI
    • 2
      Hard to customise
    • 1
      Styling system
    • 1
      # of components
    • 1
      Inflexible token structure

    related Chakra UI posts