Alternatives to Crashlytics logo

Alternatives to Crashlytics

Sentry, TestFairy, Bugsnag, Google Analytics, and Rollbar are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Crashlytics.
960
553
+ 1
337

What is Crashlytics and what are its top alternatives?

Instead of just showing you the stack trace, Crashlytics performs deep analysis of each and every thread. We de-prioritize lines that don't matter while highlighting the interesting ones. This makes reading stack traces easier, faster, and far more useful! Crashlytics' intelligent grouping can take 50,000 crashes, distill them down to 20 unique issues, and then tell you which 3 are the most important to fix.
Crashlytics is a tool in the Mobile Error Monitoring category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Crashlytics

  • Sentry

    Sentry

    Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health. ...

  • TestFairy

    TestFairy

    When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more. ...

  • Bugsnag

    Bugsnag

    Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast. ...

  • Google Analytics

    Google Analytics

    Google Analytics lets you measure your advertising ROI as well as track your Flash, video, and social networking sites and applications. ...

  • Rollbar

    Rollbar

    Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra ...

  • TestFlight

    TestFlight

    With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air. ...

  • New Relic

    New Relic

    The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too. ...

  • Fabric

    Fabric

    Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution. ...

Crashlytics alternatives & related posts

Sentry logo

Sentry

10.6K
6.5K
850
See performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize code health.
10.6K
6.5K
+ 1
850
PROS OF SENTRY
  • 234
    Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy
  • 120
    Email Notifications
  • 108
    Open source
  • 83
    Slack integration
  • 70
    Github integration
  • 48
    Easy
  • 43
    User-friendly interface
  • 28
    The most important tool we use in production
  • 18
    Hipchat integration
  • 17
    Heroku Integration
  • 15
    Good documentation
  • 13
    Free tier
  • 9
    Self-hosted
  • 8
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Realiable
  • 6
    Provides context, and great stack trace
  • 4
    Feedback form on error pages
  • 4
    Love it baby
  • 3
    Easy Integration
  • 3
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Super user friendly
  • 3
    Filter by custom tags
  • 3
    Captures local variables at each frame in backtraces
CONS OF SENTRY
  • 10
    Confusing UI

related Sentry posts

Johnny Bell

For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

See more
TestFairy logo

TestFairy

41
70
29
Painless Beta Testing
41
70
+ 1
29
PROS OF TESTFAIRY
  • 8
    Get video rec of the user on your app
  • 4
    Landing Page
  • 4
    Better design
  • 3
    JIRA Integration
  • 2
    Cross-platform
  • 2
    Supports Enterprise IPA's (TestFlight doesn't/didn't)
  • 2
    GitHub Integration
  • 1
    Application full Log information
  • 1
    Single Sign-On
  • 1
    App Distribution
  • 1
    In-App Feedback
CONS OF TESTFAIRY
    Be the first to leave a con

    related TestFairy posts

    Bugsnag logo

    Bugsnag

    1.1K
    544
    266
    Bugsnag provides production error monitoring and management for front-end, mobile and back-end applications
    1.1K
    544
    + 1
    266
    PROS OF BUGSNAG
    • 45
      Lots of 3rd party integrations
    • 42
      Really reliable
    • 36
      Includes a free plan
    • 25
      No usage or rate limits
    • 23
      Design
    • 21
      Slack integration
    • 21
      Responsive support
    • 19
      Free tier
    • 11
      Unlimited
    • 6
      No Rate
    • 5
      Email notifications
    • 3
      Great customer support
    • 3
      React Native
    • 3
      Integrates well with Laravel
    • 3
      Reliable, great UI and insights, used for all our apps
    CONS OF BUGSNAG
    • 1
      Error grouping doesn't always work

    related Bugsnag posts

    Johnny Bell

    For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

    I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

    I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

    After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

    I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

    See more
    James Smith
    Co-founder and CEO at James Smith · | 1 upvote · 199.6K views
    Shared insights
    on
    LeakCanaryLeakCanaryBugsnagBugsnag
    at

    There’s a tool called LeakCanary that was built by the team at Square. It detects memory allocations and can spot when this scenario is occurring. LeakCanary has been billed as a memory leak detection library for #Android (and you’ll be happy to know there’s a Bugsnag integration for it as well!).

    See more
    Google Analytics logo

    Google Analytics

    112.3K
    36.8K
    5K
    Enterprise-class web analytics.
    112.3K
    36.8K
    + 1
    5K
    PROS OF GOOGLE ANALYTICS
    • 1.5K
      Free
    • 925
      Easy setup
    • 888
      Data visualization
    • 696
      Real-time stats
    • 403
      Comprehensive feature set
    • 180
      Goals tracking
    • 154
      Powerful funnel conversion reporting
    • 137
      Customizable reports
    • 83
      Custom events try
    • 53
      Elastic api
    • 13
      Updated regulary
    • 8
      Interactive Documentation
    • 3
      Google play
    • 2
      Advanced ecommerce
    • 2
      Industry Standard
    • 2
      Walkman music video playlist
    • 1
      Medium / Channel data split
    • 1
      Financial Management Challenges -2015h
    • 1
      Lifesaver
    • 1
      Easy to integrate
    CONS OF GOOGLE ANALYTICS
    • 9
      Confusing UX/UI
    • 6
      Super complex
    • 5
      Very hard to build out funnels
    • 3
      Poor web performance metrics
    • 2
      Very easy to confuse the user of the analytics
    • 2
      Time spent on page isn't accurate out of the box

    related Google Analytics posts

    Tassanai Singprom

    This is my stack in Application & Data

    JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

    My Utilities Tools

    Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

    My Devops Tools

    Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

    My Business Tools

    Slack

    See more
    Max Musing
    Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 8 upvotes · 127K views

    Functionally, Amplitude and Mixpanel are incredibly similar. They both offer almost all the same functionality around tracking and visualizing user actions for analytics. You can track A/B test results in both. We ended up going with Amplitude at BaseDash because it has a more generous free tier for our uses (10 million actions per month, versus Mixpanel's 1000 monthly tracked users).

    Segment isn't meant to compete with these tools, but instead acts as an API to send actions to them, and other analytics tools. If you're just sending event data to one of these tools, you probably don't need Segment. If you're using other analytics tools like Google Analytics and FullStory, Segment makes it easy to send events to all your tools at once.

    See more
    Rollbar logo

    Rollbar

    1.5K
    996
    514
    Proactively discover, predict, and remediate errors.
    1.5K
    996
    + 1
    514
    PROS OF ROLLBAR
    • 72
      Consolidates similar errors by impact
    • 63
      Centralize error management
    • 62
      Slack integration
    • 57
      Github integration
    • 46
      Usage based pricing
    • 31
      Insane customer support
    • 22
      Instant search
    • 20
      Heroku integration
    • 17
      Consolidate errors by OS
    • 14
      Great Free Plan
    • 14
      Trello integration
    • 12
      Flexible logging (not just exceptions)
    • 10
      Simple yet powerful error tracking tool
    • 8
      Multiple Language Support
    • 6
      Consolidate errors by browser
    • 6
      Query errors with RQL
    • 6
      Easy setup
    • 5
      Awesome service
    • 5
      Deployment tracking is a nice free bonus
    • 5
      Best rails exception handler
    • 5
      Simple and fast integration
    • 4
      Easy setup, friendly ui, demo, lots of integrations
    • 3
      Errors Analysis
    • 3
      Server-side + client-side
    • 3
      Clear and concise information.
    • 3
      Powerful
    • 3
      Beat your users to the error report
    • 2
      Easy integration with sails.js
    • 2
      Bitbucket integration
    • 2
      Mailgun integration
    • 1
      Clear errors on deploy or push
    • 1
      Gitlab integration
    • 1
      Easy Set up familiar UI that doesn't make you look dumb
    CONS OF ROLLBAR
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Rollbar posts

      Robert Zuber

      Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We’ve got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We’ve definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven’t had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We’ve started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we’ve seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

      We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

      See more
      TestFlight logo

      TestFlight

      1.1K
      665
      162
      iOS beta testing on the fly.
      1.1K
      665
      + 1
      162
      PROS OF TESTFLIGHT
      • 62
        Must have for ios development
      • 49
        Beta testing
      • 19
        Easy setup
      • 10
        Easy way to push out updates for internal testers
      • 7
        In-App Updates
      • 5
        Crash Logging
      • 4
        Checkpoints
      • 3
        Multiple platforms
      • 2
        Remote Logging
      • 1
        Sessions
      CONS OF TESTFLIGHT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related TestFlight posts

        New Relic logo

        New Relic

        18.6K
        6.8K
        1.9K
        New Relic is the industry’s largest and most comprehensive cloud-based observability platform.
        18.6K
        6.8K
        + 1
        1.9K
        PROS OF NEW RELIC
        • 414
          Easy setup
        • 344
          Really powerful
        • 244
          Awesome visualization
        • 194
          Ease of use
        • 151
          Great ui
        • 107
          Free tier
        • 81
          Great tool for insights
        • 66
          Heroku Integration
        • 55
          Market leader
        • 49
          Peace of mind
        • 21
          Push notifications
        • 20
          Email notifications
        • 17
          Heroku Add-on
        • 16
          Error Detection and Alerting
        • 12
          Multiple language support
        • 11
          SQL Analysis
        • 11
          Server Resources Monitoring
        • 9
          Transaction Tracing
        • 8
          Apdex Scores
        • 8
          Azure Add-on
        • 7
          Analysis of CPU, Disk, Memory, and Network
        • 6
          Detailed reports
        • 6
          Performance of External Services
        • 6
          Error Analysis
        • 6
          Application Availability Monitoring and Alerting
        • 6
          Application Response Times
        • 5
          JVM Performance Analyzer (Java)
        • 5
          Most Time Consuming Transactions
        • 4
          Top Database Operations
        • 4
          Easy to use
        • 4
          Browser Transaction Tracing
        • 3
          Application Map
        • 3
          Pagoda Box integration
        • 3
          Custom Dashboards
        • 3
          Weekly Performance Email
        • 2
          Easy visibility
        • 2
          App Speed Index
        • 2
          Easy to setup
        • 1
          Real User Monitoring Analysis and Breakdown
        • 1
          Incident Detection and Alerting
        • 1
          Real User Monitoring Overview
        • 1
          Worst Transactions by User Dissatisfaction
        • 1
          Metric Data Resolution
        • 1
          Metric Data Retention
        • 1
          Team Collaboration Tools
        • 1
          Super Expensive
        • 1
          Time Comparisons
        • 1
          Access to Performance Data API
        • 1
          Background Jobs Transaction Analysis
        • 1
          Free
        • 1
          Best of the best, what more can you ask for
        • 1
          Best monitoring on the market
        • 1
          Rails integration
        • 0
          Exceptions
        • 0
          Ddd
        CONS OF NEW RELIC
        • 19
          Pricing model doesn't suit microservices
        • 10
          UI isn't great
        • 7
          Visualizations aren't very helpful
        • 7
          Expensive
        • 5
          Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking

        related New Relic posts

        Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
        Software Engineer at IVP · | 5 upvotes · 662.7K views

        Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

        Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

        Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

        Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

        Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

        Please advise on the above. Thanks!

        See more
        Sebastian Gębski

        Regarding Continuous Integration - we've started with something very easy to set up - CircleCI , but with time we're adding more & more complex pipelines - we use Jenkins to configure & run those. It's much more effort, but at some point we had to pay for the flexibility we expected. Our source code version control is Git (which probably doesn't require a rationale these days) and we keep repos in GitHub - since the very beginning & we never considered moving out. Our primary monitoring these days is in New Relic (Ruby & SPA apps) and AppSignal (Elixir apps) - we're considering unifying it in New Relic , but this will require some improvements in Elixir app observability. For error reporting we use Sentry (a very popular choice in this class) & we collect our distributed logs using Logentries (to avoid semi-manual handling here).

        See more
        Fabric logo

        Fabric

        415
        278
        74
        Simple, Pythonic remote execution and deployment
        415
        278
        + 1
        74
        PROS OF FABRIC
        • 22
          Python
        • 21
          Simple
        • 5
          Low learning curve, from bash script to Python power
        • 5
          Installation feedback for Twitter App Cards
        • 3
          Easy to add any type of job
        • 3
          Single config file
        • 3
          Easy on maintainance
        • 3
          Installation? pip install fabric... Boom
        • 3
          Agentless
        • 2
          Easily automate any set system automation
        • 1
          Backward compatibility
        • 1
          Remote sudo execution
        • 1
          Crash Analytics
        • 1
          Flexible
        CONS OF FABRIC
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Fabric posts