What is Cloud CMS and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to Cloud CMS
- Contentful
With Contentful, you can bring your content anywhere using our APIs, completely customize your content structure all while using your preferred programming languages and frameworks. ...
- prismic.io
Prismic is a Content Management System, a tool for editing online content, also known as a headless CMS, an API CMS, a content platform, a disruptive content-as-a-service digital experience. ...
- Sanity
Sanity is a headless, real-time CMS where the editor is an open source React-based construction kit and the backend is a graph-oriented cloud datastore with a globally distributed CDN. ...
- GraphCMS
GraphCMS is a GraphQL Based Headless Content Management System. It lets you build a hosted GraphQL backend for your applications and gives you all the tools you need to manage your content. ...
- Cockpit
An API-driven CMS without forcing you to make compromises in how you implement your site. The CMS for developers. Manage content like collections, regions, forms and galleries which you can reuse anywhere on your website. ...
- Tipe
All your Apps have text and your developers don't want to manage it. Create and manage your text or assets with powerful editing tools and access it from anywhere with a GraphQL or REST API. ...
- Nuxeo
It is a platform for rich and structured content management. Its cloud-native, modular platform plugs easily into legacy infrastructure, scales with your team, and your progress. ...
- CloudCannon
CloudCannon is the fast, intuitive solution for your Jekyll needs. Build, update, and deliver content to your customers. ...
Cloud CMS alternatives & related posts
- API-based cms30
- Much better than WordPress17
- Simple and customizable11
- Images API5
- Free for small projects3
- Extensible dashboard UI1
- Super simple to integrate1
- Managed Service1
- Tag Manager like UI1
- No spell check5
- No repeater Field5
- No free plan4
- Slow dashboard3
- Enterprise targeted2
- Pricey2
- Limited content types2
- Not scalable1
- No GraphQL API1
related Contentful posts
Hi, I went through a comprehensive analysis - of headless/api content management systems - essentially to store content "bits" and publish them where needed (website, 3rd party sites, social media, etc.). I had considered many other solutions but ultimately chose Directus. I believe that was a good choice.
I had strongly considered Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, and hygraph. Hygraph came in #2 and contentful #3.
Ultimately I liked directus for:
(1) time in business
(2) open source
(3) integration with n8n and Pipedream
(4) pricing
(5) extensibility
Thoughts? Was this a good choice? We have many WordPress sites we're not (at least now) looking to replace with Directus, but instead to push to.
I'd love some feedback.
Hi. I am gonna build a simple app for a company to ease their work. The company is sending out pdf files to their users' email. The data is a health analysis with a lot of different health values. The app should be an MVP, where users can watch their data instead of opening a pdf file. The company should be able to fill in the data in either Firebase or Contentful database. Is Contentful or Firebase best for this solution? What is your opinion?
prismic.io
- Nice writing room7
- Very Good UX3
- Prismic.io powers lichess.org/blog3
- Friendly Pricing2
- Nice UI and clean2
- Works with GraphQL with Gatsby2
- Releases - Scheduling content to go live1
- Integration Field1
- Slices - Reusable components1
- Page "slices" very useful1
- SDKs for render frameworks1
- No write API yet2
- Bad Documentation1
- No admin UX control (only schema)1
related prismic.io posts
- Headless12
- Hosted11
- Realtime7
- Powerful read + write API7
- Free for small projects7
- Customizable6
- API-based cms5
- Schema as a code5
- Easy setup, endless flexibility4
- Lightweight & pluggable Content studio4
- Works with GraphQL with Gatsby4
- Images API4
- Much better than WordPress4
- Preview content1
related Sanity posts
Hi, I went through a comprehensive analysis - of headless/api content management systems - essentially to store content "bits" and publish them where needed (website, 3rd party sites, social media, etc.). I had considered many other solutions but ultimately chose Directus. I believe that was a good choice.
I had strongly considered Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, and hygraph. Hygraph came in #2 and contentful #3.
Ultimately I liked directus for:
(1) time in business
(2) open source
(3) integration with n8n and Pipedream
(4) pricing
(5) extensibility
Thoughts? Was this a good choice? We have many WordPress sites we're not (at least now) looking to replace with Directus, but instead to push to.
I'd love some feedback.
Im building a simple portfolio website using Next.js and all the content is static, what's the best between Contentful and Sanity.
I really like the self-hosting and custom layout with sanity however I don't think time customizing is worth it anymore.
Any thoughts
- GraphQL5
- Speeds up time to market Easily create & consume conten2
- API first1
- Much better than REST1
- Reliable and scales1
- Cool dev community1
related GraphCMS posts
- Flexible and plays nicely with any frontend3
- Easy for Content Managers to understand and use3
- Open Source3
- Fast & lightweight2
- Modular2
- GraphQL2
- Self hosted2
related Cockpit posts
Tipe
- GraphQL3
- Localization3
- Asset Management3
- REST API3
- Scalable Platform3
- Content Engine2
- Rich Content Editing2
- Webhooks2
- Open-Source2
- Plugins2
- Infinitely Scalable1
- API-based cms1
- For Developers1
- Logo and Design1
- Cats1
- Workflows1
- API1
- Serverless Architecture1
- Role Based Workflows1
related Tipe posts
related Nuxeo posts
CloudCannon
related CloudCannon posts
Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.
There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.
If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).
If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).
Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.