Alternatives to Cloud CMS logo

Alternatives to Cloud CMS

Contentful, prismic.io, Sanity, GraphCMS, and Cockpit are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Cloud CMS.
19
39
+ 1
6

What is Cloud CMS and what are its top alternatives?

Easily Create, Upload and Edit;Use Simple Content Forms;Full Text Search and Query; Workspaces
Cloud CMS is a tool in the Cloud Content Management System category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Cloud CMS

  • Contentful
    Contentful

    With Contentful, you can bring your content anywhere using our APIs, completely customize your content structure all while using your preferred programming languages and frameworks. ...

  • prismic.io
    prismic.io

    Prismic is a Content Management System, a tool for editing online content, also known as a headless CMS, an API CMS, a content platform, a disruptive content-as-a-service digital experience. ...

  • Sanity
    Sanity

    Sanity is a headless, real-time CMS where the editor is an open source React-based construction kit and the backend is a graph-oriented cloud datastore with a globally distributed CDN. ...

  • GraphCMS
    GraphCMS

    GraphCMS is a GraphQL Based Headless Content Management System. It lets you build a hosted GraphQL backend for your applications and gives you all the tools you need to manage your content. ...

  • Cockpit
    Cockpit

    An API-driven CMS without forcing you to make compromises in how you implement your site. The CMS for developers. Manage content like collections, regions, forms and galleries which you can reuse anywhere on your website. ...

  • Tipe
    Tipe

    All your Apps have text and your developers don't want to manage it. Create and manage your text or assets with powerful editing tools and access it from anywhere with a GraphQL or REST API. ...

  • Nuxeo
    Nuxeo

    It is a platform for rich and structured content management. Its cloud-native, modular platform plugs easily into legacy infrastructure, scales with your team, and your progress. ...

  • CloudCannon
    CloudCannon

    CloudCannon is the fast, intuitive solution for your Jekyll needs. Build, update, and deliver content to your customers. ...

Cloud CMS alternatives & related posts

Contentful logo

Contentful

823
951
70
Contentful is a cloud-based API-first content platform
823
951
+ 1
70
PROS OF CONTENTFUL
  • 30
    API-based cms
  • 17
    Much better than WordPress
  • 11
    Simple and customizable
  • 5
    Images API
  • 3
    Free for small projects
  • 1
    Extensible dashboard UI
  • 1
    Super simple to integrate
  • 1
    Managed Service
  • 1
    Tag Manager like UI
CONS OF CONTENTFUL
  • 5
    No spell check
  • 5
    No repeater Field
  • 4
    No free plan
  • 3
    Slow dashboard
  • 2
    Enterprise targeted
  • 2
    Pricey
  • 2
    Limited content types
  • 1
    Not scalable
  • 1
    No GraphQL API

related Contentful posts

Hi, I went through a comprehensive analysis - of headless/api content management systems - essentially to store content "bits" and publish them where needed (website, 3rd party sites, social media, etc.). I had considered many other solutions but ultimately chose Directus. I believe that was a good choice.

I had strongly considered Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, and hygraph. Hygraph came in #2 and contentful #3.

Ultimately I liked directus for:

(1) time in business

(2) open source

(3) integration with n8n and Pipedream

(4) pricing

(5) extensibility

Thoughts? Was this a good choice? We have many WordPress sites we're not (at least now) looking to replace with Directus, but instead to push to.

I'd love some feedback.

See more
Shared insights
on
ContentfulContentfulFirebaseFirebase

Hi. I am gonna build a simple app for a company to ease their work. The company is sending out pdf files to their users' email. The data is a health analysis with a lot of different health values. The app should be an MVP, where users can watch their data instead of opening a pdf file. The company should be able to fill in the data in either Firebase or Contentful database. Is Contentful or Firebase best for this solution? What is your opinion?

See more
prismic.io logo

prismic.io

153
274
24
Keep your content in a content repository that you can query via its simple REST API
153
274
+ 1
24
PROS OF PRISMIC.IO
  • 7
    Nice writing room
  • 3
    Very Good UX
  • 3
    Prismic.io powers lichess.org/blog
  • 2
    Friendly Pricing
  • 2
    Nice UI and clean
  • 2
    Works with GraphQL with Gatsby
  • 1
    Releases - Scheduling content to go live
  • 1
    Integration Field
  • 1
    Slices - Reusable components
  • 1
    Page "slices" very useful
  • 1
    SDKs for render frameworks
CONS OF PRISMIC.IO
  • 2
    No write API yet
  • 1
    Bad Documentation
  • 1
    No admin UX control (only schema)

related prismic.io posts

Sanity logo

Sanity

151
283
81
A headless CMS construction kit in JavaScript
151
283
+ 1
81
PROS OF SANITY
  • 12
    Headless
  • 11
    Hosted
  • 7
    Realtime
  • 7
    Powerful read + write API
  • 7
    Free for small projects
  • 6
    Customizable
  • 5
    API-based cms
  • 5
    Schema as a code
  • 4
    Easy setup, endless flexibility
  • 4
    Lightweight & pluggable Content studio
  • 4
    Works with GraphQL with Gatsby
  • 4
    Images API
  • 4
    Much better than WordPress
  • 1
    Preview content
CONS OF SANITY
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Sanity posts

    Hi, I went through a comprehensive analysis - of headless/api content management systems - essentially to store content "bits" and publish them where needed (website, 3rd party sites, social media, etc.). I had considered many other solutions but ultimately chose Directus. I believe that was a good choice.

    I had strongly considered Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, and hygraph. Hygraph came in #2 and contentful #3.

    Ultimately I liked directus for:

    (1) time in business

    (2) open source

    (3) integration with n8n and Pipedream

    (4) pricing

    (5) extensibility

    Thoughts? Was this a good choice? We have many WordPress sites we're not (at least now) looking to replace with Directus, but instead to push to.

    I'd love some feedback.

    See more
    Nash Nziramasanga
    Software Developer at Billow Software · | 3 upvotes · 109.2K views
    Shared insights
    on
    SanitySanityContentfulContentfulNext.jsNext.js

    Im building a simple portfolio website using Next.js and all the content is static, what's the best between Contentful and Sanity.

    I really like the self-hosting and custom layout with sanity however I don't think time customizing is worth it anymore.

    Any thoughts

    See more
    GraphCMS logo

    GraphCMS

    57
    97
    11
    GraphQL Headless Content Management System
    57
    97
    + 1
    11
    PROS OF GRAPHCMS
    • 5
      GraphQL
    • 2
      Speeds up time to market Easily create & consume conten
    • 1
      API first
    • 1
      Much better than REST
    • 1
      Reliable and scales
    • 1
      Cool dev community
    CONS OF GRAPHCMS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related GraphCMS posts

      Cockpit logo

      Cockpit

      56
      235
      17
      Add content management functionality to any site - plug & play CMS
      56
      235
      + 1
      17
      PROS OF COCKPIT
      • 3
        Flexible and plays nicely with any frontend
      • 3
        Easy for Content Managers to understand and use
      • 3
        Open Source
      • 2
        Fast & lightweight
      • 2
        Modular
      • 2
        GraphQL
      • 2
        Self hosted
      CONS OF COCKPIT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Cockpit posts

        Tipe logo

        Tipe

        22
        40
        34
        Generate an API-first CMS from a schema file with offline prototyping, an inline editor, and with a REST...
        22
        40
        + 1
        34
        PROS OF TIPE
        • 3
          GraphQL
        • 3
          Localization
        • 3
          Asset Management
        • 3
          REST API
        • 3
          Scalable Platform
        • 2
          Content Engine
        • 2
          Rich Content Editing
        • 2
          Webhooks
        • 2
          Open-Source
        • 2
          Plugins
        • 1
          Infinitely Scalable
        • 1
          API-based cms
        • 1
          For Developers
        • 1
          Logo and Design
        • 1
          Cats
        • 1
          Workflows
        • 1
          API
        • 1
          Serverless Architecture
        • 1
          Role Based Workflows
        CONS OF TIPE
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Tipe posts

          Nuxeo logo

          Nuxeo

          16
          19
          0
          A content management platform for building document management
          16
          19
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF NUXEO
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF NUXEO
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Nuxeo posts

              CloudCannon logo

              CloudCannon

              9
              18
              0
              A all-in-one platform to help your team build, manage and host Jekyll websites
              9
              18
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF CLOUDCANNON
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF CLOUDCANNON
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related CloudCannon posts

                  Jan Vlnas
                  Developer Advocate at Superface · | 4 upvotes · 43.8K views

                  Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

                  There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

                  If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

                  If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

                  Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

                  See more