Alternatives to CasperJS logo

Alternatives to CasperJS

PhantomJS, Selenium, Puppeteer, Cypress, and SlimerJS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to CasperJS.
65
120
+ 1
0

What is CasperJS and what are its top alternatives?

CasperJS is a navigation scripting & testing utility for PhantomJS and SlimerJS. It allows you to navigate and scrape websites, perform automated testing, and generate screenshots. CasperJS offers features like DOM manipulation, user interaction simulation, and assertions for testing. However, it lacks active development and support, and its compatibility with newer web technologies may be limited.

  1. Puppeteer: Puppeteer is a Node library developed by Google that provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol. Key features include browser automation, navigation, and page scraping. Compared to CasperJS, Puppeteer has excellent documentation, active development, and support for modern web technologies. However, it requires some technical knowledge to set up and use effectively.

  2. Selenium: Selenium is a popular testing framework that supports multiple programming languages and browsers. It allows you to automate browser interactions, perform testing, and scrape web data. Selenium is highly versatile and widely used in the industry for web testing. However, compared to CasperJS, Selenium might have a steeper learning curve and require more setup steps.

  3. Playwright: Playwright is a Node library developed by Microsoft that provides a high-level API to automate browsers based on Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. It supports multiple programming languages and offers powerful features for web automation and testing. Playwright boasts faster execution speeds and better browser compatibility compared to CasperJS. However, it might have fewer community resources and tutorials available.

  4. Nightmare: Nightmare is a high-level browser automation library for Node.js, built on top of Electron. It allows you to automate tasks like clicking, filling forms, and scraping web pages. Nightmare provides an easy-to-use API and better debugging capabilities compared to CasperJS. However, it may have limitations in terms of browser compatibility and performance.

  5. TestCafe: TestCafe is a modern testing framework for web applications that provides automated cross-browser testing without WebDriver. It offers features like intelligent element locating and automatic waiting. TestCafe is easy to set up and use, and it supports multiple browsers. Compared to CasperJS, TestCafe may have better performance and stability in test execution.

  6. WebdriverIO: WebdriverIO is a next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework for Node.js. It supports both WebDriver and DevTools Protocol for automating web applications. WebdriverIO offers features like smart selectors and integration with popular test runners. Compared to CasperJS, WebdriverIO has a more active community and better support for modern browser technologies.

  7. SimpleBrowser: SimpleBrowser is a headless browser automation tool for .NET applications. It allows you to automate browser interactions, perform testing, and scrape web data using C# or F#. SimpleBrowser provides a simple and easy-to-use API for web automation tasks. Compared to CasperJS, SimpleBrowser is tailored for .NET environments and may lack some advanced features.

  8. Cypress: Cypress is a next-gen front end testing tool built for the modern web. It offers real-time reloading and interactive GUI for test execution. Cypress supports end-to-end testing and integration testing with an easy-to-use API. Compared to CasperJS, Cypress provides faster test execution and better debugging capabilities.

  9. Taiko: Taiko is a Node.js library that provides a test automation and browser automation API. It allows you to write code like a developer to automate tasks and perform testing on web applications. Taiko simplifies test automation with a clear and concise API. Compared to CasperJS, Taiko offers better readability and maintainability in test scripts.

  10. Katalon Studio: Katalon Studio is an all-in-one test automation solution for web, API, mobile, and desktop applications. It offers features like record and playback, test case management, and integration with popular CI/CD tools. Katalon Studio provides a comprehensive platform for test automation with a user-friendly interface. Compared to CasperJS, Katalon Studio may have a more visual approach to test automation.

Top Alternatives to CasperJS

  • PhantomJS
    PhantomJS

    PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow. ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Puppeteer
    Puppeteer

    Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome. ...

  • Cypress
    Cypress

    Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website. ...

  • SlimerJS
    SlimerJS

    It allows you to manipulate a web page with an external Javascript script: opening a webpage, clicking on links, modifying the content... It is useful to do functional tests, page automation, network monitoring, screen capture etc. ...

  • Protractor
    Protractor

    Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

CasperJS alternatives & related posts

PhantomJS logo

PhantomJS

1.2K
429
18
Scriptable Headless WebKit
1.2K
429
+ 1
18
PROS OF PHANTOMJS
  • 13
    Scriptable web browser
  • 3
    Depends on QT
  • 2
    No ECMAScript 6
CONS OF PHANTOMJS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related PhantomJS posts

    Tim Abbott

    We use CasperJS because we adopted it back in 2013 for JavaScript frontend testing. It was a really nice system back then compared to what else was out there; you had PhantomJS as a programmable browser that actually rendered CSS and everything, it was really fast (speed is a big downside of e.g. Selenium), and it was possible to make non-flaky frontend integration tests with it.

    I wouldn't recommend it today, because PhantomJS is a basically dead project, and as a result, so is CasperJS. I expect we'll migrate to something else. We haven't in large part because 95% of our new tests are written with a simple Node.js-based unit testing framework we use that run 35K lines of unit tests covering most of our JS codebase in 3.6 seconds. And for the things where we want an integration test, CasperJS does work, and I think there's a good chance that waiting another year or two will result in our being able to switch to a much better option than what we'd get if we migrated now.

    See more
    Selenium logo

    Selenium

    15.4K
    12.4K
    526
    Web Browser Automation
    15.4K
    12.4K
    + 1
    526
    PROS OF SELENIUM
    • 176
      Automates browsers
    • 154
      Testing
    • 101
      Essential tool for running test automation
    • 24
      Record-Playback
    • 24
      Remote Control
    • 8
      Data crawling
    • 7
      Supports end to end testing
    • 6
      Easy set up
    • 6
      Functional testing
    • 4
      The Most flexible monitoring system
    • 3
      End to End Testing
    • 3
      Easy to integrate with build tools
    • 2
      Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
    • 2
      Record and playback
    • 2
      Compatible with Python
    • 2
      Easy to scale
    • 2
      Integration Tests
    • 0
      Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
    CONS OF SELENIUM
    • 8
      Flaky tests
    • 4
      Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
    • 2
      Update browser drivers

    related Selenium posts

    Kamil Kowalski
    Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 3.9M views

    When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

    See more
    Benjamin Poon
    QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 2.2M views

    For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

    With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

    See more
    Puppeteer logo

    Puppeteer

    611
    570
    26
    Headless Chrome Node API
    611
    570
    + 1
    26
    PROS OF PUPPETEER
    • 10
      Very well documented
    • 10
      Scriptable web browser
    • 6
      Promise based
    CONS OF PUPPETEER
    • 10
      Chrome only

    related Puppeteer posts

    Raziel Alron
    Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 2M views

    Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

    See more
    Dave Willenberg
    Founding Director at Detroit Technical English · | 7 upvotes · 35.1K views
    HTML Templates: a Pain in the Backend

    We chose Pug because writing raw HTML is about as enjoyable as a fart in a spacesuit, and writing decently-rendering HTML for enterprise email clients is a soul-sucking type of black magic.

    Pug takes HTML as a (...markdown) language out of the stack by using a simple, sane syntax to represent HTML in just JavaScript©. Piecing together what you need from any number of standalone - including functional - components is both delightfully easy, and easy to maintain.

    All you're really writing are exportable JavaScript functions that take a single Object parameter - once that concept takes hold, you'll quickly swear off angle brackets in favor of neatly indented and extensible e-mail, invoice, and reporting templates.

    There's a jstransformer filter for instant interop with just about every preprocessor ( Stylus , in our case) and file format out there. Pass that compiled HTML though Juice on Node.js and bam - rugged HTML-emails that hold up in even the wonkiest Lotus Notes clients.

    That the end result is 'just HTML' is the final cherry on top. Debugging needs only DevTools, and Puppeteer 's now all you need to create fancy-pants PDFs to your heart's content.

    See more
    Cypress logo

    Cypress

    2.4K
    2K
    115
    When testing is easy, developers build better things faster and with confidence.
    2.4K
    2K
    + 1
    115
    PROS OF CYPRESS
    • 29
      Open source
    • 22
      Great documentation
    • 20
      Simple usage
    • 18
      Fast
    • 10
      Cross Browser testing
    • 9
      Easy us with CI
    • 5
      Npm install cypress only
    • 2
      Good for beginner automation engineers
    CONS OF CYPRESS
    • 21
      Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
    • 14
      Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
    • 12
      No iFrame support
    • 9
      No page object support
    • 9
      No multiple domain support
    • 8
      No file upload support
    • 8
      No support for multiple tab control
    • 8
      No xPath support
    • 7
      No support for Safari
    • 7
      Cypress doesn't support native app
    • 7
      Re-run failed tests retries not supported yet
    • 7
      No support for multiple browser control
    • 5
      $20/user/thread for reports
    • 4
      Adobe
    • 4
      Using a non-standard automation protocol
    • 4
      Not freeware
    • 3
      No 'WD wire protocol' support

    related Cypress posts

    Kamil Kowalski
    Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 3.9M views

    When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

    See more
    Robert Zuber

    We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.

    See more
    SlimerJS logo

    SlimerJS

    14
    17
    0
    A scriptable browser for Web developers
    14
    17
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF SLIMERJS
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF SLIMERJS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related SlimerJS posts

        Protractor logo

        Protractor

        1K
        543
        33
        End-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications
        1K
        543
        + 1
        33
        PROS OF PROTRACTOR
        • 9
          Easy setup
        • 8
          Quick tests implementation
        • 6
          Flexible
        • 5
          Open source
        • 5
          Promise support
        CONS OF PROTRACTOR
        • 4
          Limited

        related Protractor posts

        Raziel Alron
        Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 2M views

        Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

        See more
        Sai Chaitanya Mankala
        Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 864.8K views

        Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

        We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

        See more
        JavaScript logo

        JavaScript

        352.4K
        268.2K
        8.1K
        Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
        352.4K
        268.2K
        + 1
        8.1K
        PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
        • 1.7K
          Can be used on frontend/backend
        • 1.5K
          It's everywhere
        • 1.2K
          Lots of great frameworks
        • 897
          Fast
        • 745
          Light weight
        • 425
          Flexible
        • 392
          You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
        • 286
          Non-blocking i/o
        • 237
          Ubiquitousness
        • 191
          Expressive
        • 55
          Extended functionality to web pages
        • 49
          Relatively easy language
        • 46
          Executed on the client side
        • 30
          Relatively fast to the end user
        • 25
          Pure Javascript
        • 21
          Functional programming
        • 15
          Async
        • 13
          Full-stack
        • 12
          Setup is easy
        • 12
          Future Language of The Web
        • 12
          Its everywhere
        • 11
          Because I love functions
        • 11
          JavaScript is the New PHP
        • 10
          Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
        • 9
          Expansive community
        • 9
          Everyone use it
        • 9
          Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
        • 9
          Easy
        • 8
          Most Popular Language in the World
        • 8
          Powerful
        • 8
          Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
        • 8
          For the good parts
        • 8
          No need to use PHP
        • 8
          Easy to hire developers
        • 7
          Agile, packages simple to use
        • 7
          Love-hate relationship
        • 7
          Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
        • 7
          Evolution of C
        • 7
          It's fun
        • 7
          Hard not to use
        • 7
          Versitile
        • 7
          Its fun and fast
        • 7
          Nice
        • 7
          Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
        • 7
          Supports lambdas and closures
        • 6
          It let's me use Babel & Typescript
        • 6
          Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
        • 6
          1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
        • 6
          Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
        • 6
          Easy to make something
        • 5
          Clojurescript
        • 5
          Promise relationship
        • 5
          Stockholm Syndrome
        • 5
          Function expressions are useful for callbacks
        • 5
          Scope manipulation
        • 5
          Everywhere
        • 5
          Client processing
        • 5
          What to add
        • 4
          Because it is so simple and lightweight
        • 4
          Only Programming language on browser
        • 1
          Test
        • 1
          Hard to learn
        • 1
          Test2
        • 1
          Not the best
        • 1
          Easy to understand
        • 1
          Subskill #4
        • 1
          Easy to learn
        • 0
          Hard 彤
        CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
        • 22
          A constant moving target, too much churn
        • 20
          Horribly inconsistent
        • 15
          Javascript is the New PHP
        • 9
          No ability to monitor memory utilitization
        • 8
          Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
        • 7
          Thinks strange results are better than errors
        • 6
          Can be ugly
        • 3
          No GitHub
        • 2
          Slow

        related JavaScript posts

        Zach Holman

        Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

        But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

        But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

        Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

        See more
        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.9M views

        How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

        Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

        Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

        https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

        (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

        Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

        See more
        Python logo

        Python

        240.6K
        196.3K
        6.9K
        A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
        240.6K
        196.3K
        + 1
        6.9K
        PROS OF PYTHON
        • 1.2K
          Great libraries
        • 961
          Readable code
        • 846
          Beautiful code
        • 787
          Rapid development
        • 689
          Large community
        • 435
          Open source
        • 393
          Elegant
        • 282
          Great community
        • 272
          Object oriented
        • 220
          Dynamic typing
        • 77
          Great standard library
        • 59
          Very fast
        • 55
          Functional programming
        • 49
          Easy to learn
        • 45
          Scientific computing
        • 35
          Great documentation
        • 29
          Productivity
        • 28
          Easy to read
        • 28
          Matlab alternative
        • 23
          Simple is better than complex
        • 20
          It's the way I think
        • 19
          Imperative
        • 18
          Free
        • 18
          Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
        • 17
          Powerfull language
        • 17
          Machine learning support
        • 16
          Fast and simple
        • 14
          Scripting
        • 12
          Explicit is better than implicit
        • 11
          Ease of development
        • 10
          Clear and easy and powerfull
        • 9
          Unlimited power
        • 8
          It's lean and fun to code
        • 8
          Import antigravity
        • 7
          Print "life is short, use python"
        • 7
          Python has great libraries for data processing
        • 6
          Although practicality beats purity
        • 6
          Flat is better than nested
        • 6
          Great for tooling
        • 6
          Rapid Prototyping
        • 6
          Readability counts
        • 6
          High Documented language
        • 6
          I love snakes
        • 6
          Fast coding and good for competitions
        • 6
          There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
        • 6
          Now is better than never
        • 5
          Great for analytics
        • 5
          Lists, tuples, dictionaries
        • 4
          Easy to learn and use
        • 4
          Simple and easy to learn
        • 4
          Easy to setup and run smooth
        • 4
          Web scraping
        • 4
          CG industry needs
        • 4
          Socially engaged community
        • 4
          Complex is better than complicated
        • 4
          Multiple Inheritence
        • 4
          Beautiful is better than ugly
        • 4
          Plotting
        • 3
          If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
        • 3
          Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
        • 3
          Pip install everything
        • 3
          List comprehensions
        • 3
          No cruft
        • 3
          Generators
        • 3
          Import this
        • 3
          It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
        • 3
          Many types of collections
        • 3
          If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
        • 2
          Batteries included
        • 2
          Should START with this but not STICK with This
        • 2
          Powerful language for AI
        • 2
          Can understand easily who are new to programming
        • 2
          Flexible and easy
        • 2
          Good for hacking
        • 2
          A-to-Z
        • 2
          Because of Netflix
        • 2
          Only one way to do it
        • 2
          Better outcome
        • 1
          Sexy af
        • 1
          Slow
        • 1
          Securit
        • 0
          Ni
        • 0
          Powerful
        CONS OF PYTHON
        • 53
          Still divided between python 2 and python 3
        • 28
          Performance impact
        • 26
          Poor syntax for anonymous functions
        • 22
          GIL
        • 19
          Package management is a mess
        • 14
          Too imperative-oriented
        • 12
          Hard to understand
        • 12
          Dynamic typing
        • 12
          Very slow
        • 8
          Indentations matter a lot
        • 8
          Not everything is expression
        • 7
          Incredibly slow
        • 7
          Explicit self parameter in methods
        • 6
          Requires C functions for dynamic modules
        • 6
          Poor DSL capabilities
        • 6
          No anonymous functions
        • 5
          Fake object-oriented programming
        • 5
          Threading
        • 5
          The "lisp style" whitespaces
        • 5
          Official documentation is unclear.
        • 5
          Hard to obfuscate
        • 5
          Circular import
        • 4
          Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
        • 4
          The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
        • 4
          Not suitable for autocomplete
        • 2
          Meta classes
        • 1
          Training wheels (forced indentation)

        related Python posts

        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.9M views

        How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

        Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

        Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

        https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

        (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

        Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

        See more
        Nick Parsons
        Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 3.9M views

        Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

        We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

        We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

        Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

        #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

        See more