Alternatives to AWS Cloud Development Kit logo

Alternatives to AWS Cloud Development Kit

AWS CloudFormation, Packer, Pulumi, Yocto, and GeoEngineer are the most popular alternatives and competitors to AWS Cloud Development Kit.
190
96
+ 1
0

What is AWS Cloud Development Kit and what are its top alternatives?

AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) is an open-source software development framework to define cloud infrastructure in code and provision it through AWS CloudFormation. This allows developers to define cloud resources in familiar programming languages rather than using templates. Key features include infrastructure as code, multi-language support, and easy integration with AWS services. However, some limitations include the learning curve for beginners and the dependence on AWS services.

  1. Terraform: Terraform is an open-source infrastructure as code software tool created by HashiCorp. It allows users to define and provision infrastructure using a declarative configuration language. Key features include support for multiple cloud providers, reusable modules, and state management. Pros include multi-cloud support and a large community, while cons may include a steeper learning curve compared to AWS CDK.
  2. Pulumi: Pulumi is an open-source infrastructure as code tool that allows users to define cloud infrastructure using familiar programming languages, similar to AWS CDK. Key features include multi-cloud support, real-time previews, and automated deployment. Pros include support for various languages and easy integration with existing tools, while cons could be the need for additional configuration.
  3. Google Cloud Deployment Manager: Google Cloud Deployment Manager is a service provided by Google Cloud Platform for creating and managing cloud resources through templates. Key features include infrastructure as code, repeatable deployments, and version control integration. Pros include seamless integration with Google Cloud Platform services, while cons may include limited support for other cloud providers.
  4. Azure Resource Manager: Azure Resource Manager is a service provided by Microsoft Azure for managing and organizing cloud resources in groups called Resource Groups. Key features include template-based deployment, role-based access control, and resource tagging. Pros include deep integration with Microsoft Azure services, while cons may include limited support for other cloud providers.
  5. CloudFormation: AWS CloudFormation is a service provided by Amazon Web Services for defining and provisioning cloud infrastructure in an automated and secure manner. Key features include infrastructure as code, version control, and resource dependencies. Pros include tight integration with AWS services, while cons may include limited support for other cloud providers.
  6. Ansible: Ansible is an open-source automation tool that allows users to automate infrastructure configuration and management. Key features include agentless architecture, playbooks for defining tasks, and large community support. Pros include ease of use and flexibility, while cons may include limited support for complex cloud infrastructure provisioning.
  7. Chef: Chef is a configuration management tool that allows users to define infrastructure as code and automate the deployment of cloud resources. Key features include reusable recipes, version control, and continuous automation. Pros include scalability and flexibility, while cons may include a steeper learning curve and complex setup.
  8. SaltStack: SaltStack is an open-source infrastructure automation tool that allows users to define and orchestrate cloud infrastructure using a declarative configuration language. Key features include remote execution, event-driven automation, and configuration drift detection. Pros include scalability and performance, while cons may include complexity and learning curve.
  9. Serverless Framework: Serverless Framework is an open-source framework that simplifies the deployment of serverless applications on various cloud providers. Key features include easy configuration, multi-cloud support, and plugin ecosystem. Pros include ease of use for serverless deployments, while cons may include limitations for complex infrastructure setups.
  10. Kubernetes: Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration platform that allows users to automate the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. Key features include declarative configuration, auto-scaling, and self-healing capabilities. Pros include scalability and flexibility, while cons may include complexity for managing infrastructure at scale.

Top Alternatives to AWS Cloud Development Kit

  • AWS CloudFormation
    AWS CloudFormation

    You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work. ...

  • Packer
    Packer

    Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images. ...

  • Pulumi
    Pulumi

    Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages. ...

  • Yocto
    Yocto

    It is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture. It provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices, or anywhere a customized Linux OS is needed. ...

  • GeoEngineer
    GeoEngineer

    GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping. ...

  • Azure Resource Manager
    Azure Resource Manager

    It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment. ...

  • Habitat
    Habitat

    Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features. ...

  • Atlas
    Atlas

    Atlas is one foundation to manage and provide visibility to your servers, containers, VMs, configuration management, service discovery, and additional operations services. ...

AWS Cloud Development Kit alternatives & related posts

AWS CloudFormation logo

AWS CloudFormation

1.5K
1.3K
88
Create and manage a collection of related AWS resources
1.5K
1.3K
+ 1
88
PROS OF AWS CLOUDFORMATION
  • 43
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 21
    Declarative infrastructure and deployment
  • 13
    No more clicking around
  • 3
    Any Operative System you want
  • 3
    Atomic
  • 3
    Infrastructure as code
  • 1
    CDK makes it truly infrastructure-as-code
  • 1
    Automates Infrastructure Deployment
  • 0
    K8s
CONS OF AWS CLOUDFORMATION
  • 4
    Brittle
  • 2
    No RBAC and policies in templates

related AWS CloudFormation posts

Joseph Kunzler
DevOps Engineer at Tillable · | 9 upvotes · 201.8K views

We use Terraform because we needed a way to automate the process of building and deploying feature branches. We wanted to hide the complexity such that when a dev creates a PR, it triggers a build and deployment without the dev having to worry about any of the 'plumbing' going on behind the scenes. Terraform allows us to automate the process of provisioning DNS records, Amazon S3 buckets, Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)'s. It also makes it easy to tear it all down when finished. We also like that it supports multiple clouds, which is why we chose to use it over AWS CloudFormation.

See more

I use Terraform because it hits the level of abstraction pocket of being high-level and flexible, and is agnostic to cloud platforms. Creating complex infrastructure components for a solution with a UI console is tedious to repeat. Using low-level APIs are usually specific to cloud platforms, and you still have to build your own tooling for deploying, state management, and destroying infrastructure.

However, Terraform is usually slower to implement new services compared to cloud-specific APIs. It's worth the trade-off though, especially if you're multi-cloud. I heard someone say, "We want to preference a cloud, not lock in to one." Terraform builds on that claim.

Terraform Google Cloud Deployment Manager AWS CloudFormation

See more
Packer logo

Packer

582
561
42
Create identical machine images for multiple platforms from a single source configuration
582
561
+ 1
42
PROS OF PACKER
  • 27
    Cross platform builds
  • 9
    Vm creation automation
  • 4
    Bake in security
  • 1
    Good documentation
  • 1
    Easy to use
CONS OF PACKER
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Packer posts

    John Kodumal

    LaunchDarkly is almost a five year old company, and our methodology for deploying was state of the art... for 2014. We recently undertook a project to modernize the way we #deploy our software, moving from Ansible-based deploy scripts that executed on our local machines, to using Spinnaker (along with Terraform and Packer) as the basis of our deployment system. We've been using Armory's enterprise Spinnaker offering to make this project a reality.

    See more
    Pulumi logo

    Pulumi

    254
    287
    25
    Modern Infrastructure as Code
    254
    287
    + 1
    25
    PROS OF PULUMI
    • 8
      Infrastructure as code with less pain
    • 4
      Best-in-class kubernetes support
    • 3
      Simple
    • 3
      Can use many languages
    • 2
      Great CLI
    • 2
      Can be self-hosted
    • 2
      Multi-cloud
    • 1
      Built-in secret management
    CONS OF PULUMI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Pulumi posts

      Yocto logo

      Yocto

      69
      64
      0
      An open Source embedded Linux build system
      69
      64
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF YOCTO
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF YOCTO
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Yocto posts

          GeoEngineer logo

          GeoEngineer

          52
          65
          0
          Ruby DSL and DSL (geo) to codify then plan and execute changes to cloud resources, by Coinbase
          52
          65
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF GEOENGINEER
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF GEOENGINEER
              Be the first to leave a con

              related GeoEngineer posts

              Azure Resource Manager logo

              Azure Resource Manager

              38
              91
              9
              A management framework that allows administrators to deploy, manage and monitor Azure resources
              38
              91
              + 1
              9
              PROS OF AZURE RESOURCE MANAGER
              • 3
                Bicep - Simple Declarative Language
              • 1
                Infrastructure-as-Code
              • 1
                Over 1K samples the QuickStart repo
              • 1
                Deep integration with Azure services like Azure Policy
              • 1
                Day 1 resource support
              • 1
                RBAC and Policies in templates
              • 1
                Versioned deployment via Blueprints
              CONS OF AZURE RESOURCE MANAGER
                Be the first to leave a con

                related Azure Resource Manager posts

                Habitat logo

                Habitat

                33
                59
                5
                Application Automation framework by Chef
                33
                59
                + 1
                5
                PROS OF HABITAT
                • 2
                  Easy to use
                • 1
                  Supervisor is great concept
                • 1
                  Lightweight
                • 1
                  Cross platform builds
                CONS OF HABITAT
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Habitat posts

                  Atlas logo

                  Atlas

                  32
                  125
                  0
                  Develop, deploy, and maintain your application anywhere. Use one console and one workflow from development to production
                  32
                  125
                  + 1
                  0
                  PROS OF ATLAS
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF ATLAS
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related Atlas posts