Alternatives to Teampass logo

Alternatives to Teampass

Vault, Passbolt, bitwarden, KeePass, and LastPass are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Teampass.
8
46
+ 1
3

What is Teampass and what are its top alternatives?

Teampass is a secure password manager designed for teams to share passwords and sensitive information in a secure manner. Its key features include user-friendly interface, role-based access control, password history tracking, and customizable user permissions. However, Teampass lacks advanced features such as password strength analysis and automatic password rotation.

  1. Bitwarden: Bitwarden is a popular open-source password manager with secure cloud syncing, two-factor authentication, and browser extensions. It offers end-to-end encryption and supports multiple devices. Pros: Easy to use, cross-platform. Cons: Limited to 2-factor authentication on free plan.
  2. LastPass: LastPass is a feature-rich password manager with secure password storage, automatic form filling, and password generator. It supports multi-factor authentication and works across multiple devices. Pros: User-friendly, advanced security features. Cons: Some features limited to premium plan.
  3. 1Password: 1Password is a popular password manager known for its strong security measures, including end-to-end encryption and biometric authentication. It offers secure password sharing and digital wallet for sensitive information. Pros: Strong security, easy to use. Cons: Limited free version, can be expensive.
  4. Dashlane: Dashlane is a user-friendly password manager with strong security features like encryption, automatic password changer, and secure sharing. It also includes a built-in VPN for added privacy. Pros: Intuitive design, comprehensive features. Cons: Expensive compared to other options.
  5. Keeper: Keeper is a password manager designed for businesses with features like secure file storage, role-based access control, and secure sharing. It offers biometric login and emergency access feature. Pros: Business-focused features, strong security. Cons: Can be complex for personal use.
  6. RoboForm: RoboForm is a password manager with features like password auditing, secure sharing, and form filling. It offers multi-platform support and optional cloud backup. Pros: Form-filling capabilities, intuitive interface. Cons: Limited in advanced security features.
  7. KeePass: KeePass is a popular open-source password manager with strong encryption, password generator, and plugin support. It offers local storage options and no cloud dependency. Pros: Highly secure, customizable. Cons: No automatic syncing between devices.
  8. NordPass: NordPass is a password manager from the makers of NordVPN, offering secure password storage, password sharing, and biometric authentication. It includes a password health feature for monitoring password strength. Pros: Integration with NordVPN, easy to use. Cons: Requires subscription for advanced features.
  9. Enpass: Enpass is a password manager with local storage options, strong encryption, and secure sharing. It offers multiple vaults, biometric login, and cross-platform support. Pros: Local storage options, affordable pricing. Cons: No emergency access feature.
  10. Buttercup: Buttercup is an open-source password manager with end-to-end encryption, cross-platform support, and secure password sharing. It offers customizable fields and attachments for storing additional information. Pros: Open-source, customizable. Cons: Limited third-party integrations.

Top Alternatives to Teampass

  • Vault
    Vault

    Vault is a tool for securely accessing secrets. A secret is anything that you want to tightly control access to, such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and more. Vault provides a unified interface to any secret, while providing tight access control and recording a detailed audit log. ...

  • Passbolt
    Passbolt

    Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP. ...

  • bitwarden
    bitwarden

    bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices. ...

  • KeePass
    KeePass

    It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file. ...

  • LastPass
    LastPass

    LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing. ...

  • Slack
    Slack

    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...

  • Jira
    Jira

    Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster. ...

  • Trello
    Trello

    Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process. ...

Teampass alternatives & related posts

Vault logo

Vault

795
71
Secure, store, and tightly control access to tokens, passwords, certificates, API keys, and other secrets in modern computing
795
71
PROS OF VAULT
  • 17
    Secure
  • 13
    Variety of Secret Backends
  • 11
    Very easy to set up and use
  • 8
    Dynamic secret generation
  • 5
    AuditLog
  • 3
    Privilege Access Management
  • 3
    Leasing and Renewal
  • 2
    Easy to integrate with
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 2
    Consol integration
  • 2
    Handles secret sprawl
  • 2
    Variety of Auth Backends
  • 1
    Multicloud
CONS OF VAULT
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Vault posts

    Tymoteusz Paul
    Devops guy at X20X Development LTD · | 23 upvotes · 10M views

    Often enough I have to explain my way of going about setting up a CI/CD pipeline with multiple deployment platforms. Since I am a bit tired of yapping the same every single time, I've decided to write it up and share with the world this way, and send people to read it instead ;). I will explain it on "live-example" of how the Rome got built, basing that current methodology exists only of readme.md and wishes of good luck (as it usually is ;)).

    It always starts with an app, whatever it may be and reading the readmes available while Vagrant and VirtualBox is installing and updating. Following that is the first hurdle to go over - convert all the instruction/scripts into Ansible playbook(s), and only stopping when doing a clear vagrant up or vagrant reload we will have a fully working environment. As our Vagrant environment is now functional, it's time to break it! This is the moment to look for how things can be done better (too rigid/too lose versioning? Sloppy environment setup?) and replace them with the right way to do stuff, one that won't bite us in the backside. This is the point, and the best opportunity, to upcycle the existing way of doing dev environment to produce a proper, production-grade product.

    I should probably digress here for a moment and explain why. I firmly believe that the way you deploy production is the same way you should deploy develop, shy of few debugging-friendly setting. This way you avoid the discrepancy between how production work vs how development works, which almost always causes major pains in the back of the neck, and with use of proper tools should mean no more work for the developers. That's why we start with Vagrant as developer boxes should be as easy as vagrant up, but the meat of our product lies in Ansible which will do meat of the work and can be applied to almost anything: AWS, bare metal, docker, LXC, in open net, behind vpn - you name it.

    We must also give proper consideration to monitoring and logging hoovering at this point. My generic answer here is to grab Elasticsearch, Kibana, and Logstash. While for different use cases there may be better solutions, this one is well battle-tested, performs reasonably and is very easy to scale both vertically (within some limits) and horizontally. Logstash rules are easy to write and are well supported in maintenance through Ansible, which as I've mentioned earlier, are at the very core of things, and creating triggers/reports and alerts based on Elastic and Kibana is generally a breeze, including some quite complex aggregations.

    If we are happy with the state of the Ansible it's time to move on and put all those roles and playbooks to work. Namely, we need something to manage our CI/CD pipelines. For me, the choice is obvious: TeamCity. It's modern, robust and unlike most of the light-weight alternatives, it's transparent. What I mean by that is that it doesn't tell you how to do things, doesn't limit your ways to deploy, or test, or package for that matter. Instead, it provides a developer-friendly and rich playground for your pipelines. You can do most the same with Jenkins, but it has a quite dated look and feel to it, while also missing some key functionality that must be brought in via plugins (like quality REST API which comes built-in with TeamCity). It also comes with all the common-handy plugins like Slack or Apache Maven integration.

    The exact flow between CI and CD varies too greatly from one application to another to describe, so I will outline a few rules that guide me in it: 1. Make build steps as small as possible. This way when something breaks, we know exactly where, without needing to dig and root around. 2. All security credentials besides development environment must be sources from individual Vault instances. Keys to those containers should exist only on the CI/CD box and accessible by a few people (the less the better). This is pretty self-explanatory, as anything besides dev may contain sensitive data and, at times, be public-facing. Because of that appropriate security must be present. TeamCity shines in this department with excellent secrets-management. 3. Every part of the build chain shall consume and produce artifacts. If it creates nothing, it likely shouldn't be its own build. This way if any issue shows up with any environment or version, all developer has to do it is grab appropriate artifacts to reproduce the issue locally. 4. Deployment builds should be directly tied to specific Git branches/tags. This enables much easier tracking of what caused an issue, including automated identifying and tagging the author (nothing like automated regression testing!).

    Speaking of deployments, I generally try to keep it simple but also with a close eye on the wallet. Because of that, I am more than happy with AWS or another cloud provider, but also constantly peeking at the loads and do we get the value of what we are paying for. Often enough the pattern of use is not constantly erratic, but rather has a firm baseline which could be migrated away from the cloud and into bare metal boxes. That is another part where this approach strongly triumphs over the common Docker and CircleCI setup, where you are very much tied in to use cloud providers and getting out is expensive. Here to embrace bare-metal hosting all you need is a help of some container-based self-hosting software, my personal preference is with Proxmox and LXC. Following that all you must write are ansible scripts to manage hardware of Proxmox, similar way as you do for Amazon EC2 (ansible supports both greatly) and you are good to go. One does not exclude another, quite the opposite, as they can live in great synergy and cut your costs dramatically (the heavier your base load, the bigger the savings) while providing production-grade resiliency.

    See more
    Joseph Irving
    DevOps Engineer at uSwitch · | 8 upvotes · 22.9K views

    At uSwitch we use Vault to generate short lived database credentials for our applications running in Kubernetes. We wanted to move from an environment where we had 100 dbs with a variety of static passwords being shared around to a place where each pod would have credentials that only last for its lifetime.

    We chose vault because:

    • It had built in Kubernetes support so we could use service accounts to permission which pods could access which database.

    • A terraform provider so that we could configure both our RDS instances and their vault configuration in one place.

    • A variety of database providers including MySQL/PostgreSQL (our most common dbs).

    • A good api/Go -sdk so that we could build tooling around it to simplify development worfklow.

    • It had other features we would utilise such as PKI

    See more
    Passbolt logo

    Passbolt

    48
    37
    Open source password manager for teams
    48
    37
    PROS OF PASSBOLT
    • 9
      Open source
    • 6
      Designed for teams
    • 6
      Firefox extension
    • 4
      Docker image
    • 4
      Chrome extension
    • 2
      Mobile app
    • 1
      Json API
    • 1
      CLI
    • 1
      End-to-end encryption
    • 1
      Import & Export
    • 1
      Collaboration
    • 1
      TOTP
    CONS OF PASSBOLT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Passbolt posts

      bitwarden logo

      bitwarden

      221
      107
      Free and open source password manager for all of your devices
      221
      107
      PROS OF BITWARDEN
      • 23
        Open source
      • 16
        All devices
      • 15
        Synchronized across browsers and devices
      • 12
        Passwords stored encrypted
      • 10
        Easy setup
      • 6
        Firefox addon for desktop and mobile
      • 4
        TOTP
      • 4
        Import & Export
      • 4
        FIDO UTF support
      • 4
        Password Generator
      • 4
        Auto-fill
      • 3
        Chrome plugin
      • 2
        Free
      CONS OF BITWARDEN
      • 3
        Small Developer Team
      • 1
        Difficult to use

      related bitwarden posts

      Shared insights
      on
      bitwardenbitwarden1Password1Password

      I’m doing a school project where I have to design a database for a password manager app like 1Password, bitwarden… I’m not sure which database paradigms I should use. Users would have the ability to create vaults and each vault will have many items and can be sorted into favorite, category, tag list… Please help.

      See more
      KeePass logo

      KeePass

      69
      30
      A free and open source password manager
      69
      30
      PROS OF KEEPASS
      • 9
        Free
      • 7
        Password stored encrypted
      • 4
        Password Generator
      • 3
        Plugings
      • 3
        Advanced Search
      • 3
        Import & Export
      • 1
        Biometric unlock
      • 0
        TOTP
      CONS OF KEEPASS
      • 1
        Password share is unencrypted
      • 0
        Free

      related KeePass posts

      LastPass logo

      LastPass

      310
      83
      Password manager that works with all browsers & smartphones
      310
      83
      PROS OF LASTPASS
      • 20
        Synchronised across browsers
      • 17
        Chrome plugin
      • 15
        Passwords stored encrpyted
      • 9
        Central servers do not have keys
      • 9
        All devices
      • 3
        Better then lesspass
      • 3
        Company wide
      • 3
        The most cost-effective b/t Roboform and 1Password
      • 2
        Free plan
      • 1
        Cross Platform
      • 1
        Its just better
      CONS OF LASTPASS
      • 3
        Slow, unpredictable sync when sharing passwords
      • 3
        UI for admins is an inconsistent mess
      • 2
        Paid
      • 1
        Buggy Chrome add-on
      • 1
        Cannot edit shared password

      related LastPass posts

      Justin Dorfman
      Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 3 upvotes · 305.8K views
      Shared insights
      on
      LastPassLastPass1Password1Password

      I use LastPass because it had Android support before 1Password. Also, it's just a great product. It gives me peace of mind with 2-step auth and a YubiKey.

      The only thing that drives me nuts is the password generator, sometimes it just doesn't work on certain sites. That is why I wrote/use g20 😎

      See more

      Firebase Cloud Firestore Cloud Functions for Firebase Google App Engine React React Native React Native Firebase NativeBase Twilio Dwolla.js Yarn fastlane Bitbucket Slack LastPass

      See more
      Slack logo

      Slack

      119.6K
      6K
      Bring all your communication together in one place
      119.6K
      6K
      PROS OF SLACK
      • 1.2K
        Easy to integrate with
      • 876
        Excellent interface on multiple platforms
      • 849
        Free
      • 694
        Mobile friendly
      • 690
        People really enjoy using it
      • 331
        Great integrations
      • 315
        Flexible notification preferences
      • 198
        Unlimited users
      • 184
        Strong search and data archiving
      • 155
        Multi domain switching support
      • 82
        Easy to use
      • 40
        Beautiful
      • 27
        Hubot support
      • 22
        Unread/read control
      • 21
        Slackbot
      • 19
        Permalink for each messages
      • 17
        Text snippet with highlighting
      • 15
        Quote message easily
      • 14
        Per-room notification
      • 13
        Awesome integration support
      • 12
        Star for each message / attached files
      • 12
        IRC gateway
      • 11
        Good communication within a team
      • 11
        Dropbox Integration
      • 10
        Slick, search is great
      • 10
        Jira Integration
      • 9
        New Relic Integration
      • 8
        Great communication tool
      • 8
        Combine All Services Quickly
      • 8
        Asana Integration
      • 7
        This tool understands developers
      • 7
        XMPP gateway
      • 7
        Google Drive Integration
      • 7
        Awesomeness
      • 6
        Replaces email
      • 6
        Twitter Integration
      • 6
        Google Docs Integration
      • 6
        BitBucket integration
      • 5
        Jenkins Integration
      • 5
        GREAT Customer Support / Quick Response to Feedback
      • 5
        Guest and Restricted user control
      • 4
        Clean UI
      • 4
        Excellent multi platform internal communication tool
      • 4
        GitHub integration
      • 4
        Mention list view
      • 4
        Gathers all my communications in one place
      • 3
        Perfect implementation of chat + integrations
      • 3
        Easy
      • 3
        Easy to add a reaction
      • 3
        Timely while non intrusive
      • 3
        Great on-boarding
      • 3
        Threaded chat
      • 3
        Visual Studio Integration
      • 3
        Easy to start working with
      • 3
        Android app
      • 2
        Simplicity
      • 2
        Message Actions
      • 2
        It's basically an improved (although closed) IRC
      • 2
        So much better than email
      • 2
        Eases collaboration for geographically dispersed teams
      • 2
        Great interface
      • 2
        Great Channel Customization
      • 2
        Markdown
      • 2
        Intuitive, easy to use, great integrations
      • 1
        Great Support Team
      • 1
        Watch
      • 1
        Multi work-space support
      • 1
        Flexible and Accessible
      • 1
        Better User Experience
      • 1
        Archive Importing
      • 1
        Travis CI integration
      • 1
        It's the coolest IM ever
      • 1
        Community
      • 1
        Great API
      • 1
        Easy remote communication
      • 1
        Get less busy
      • 1
        API
      • 1
        Zapier integration
      • 1
        Targetprocess integration
      • 1
        Finally with terrible "threading"—I miss Flowdock
      • 1
        Complete with plenty of Electron BLOAT
      • 1
        I was 666 star :D
      • 1
        Dev communication Made Easy
      • 1
        Integrates with just about everything
      • 1
        Very customizable
      • 0
        Platforms
      • 0
        Easy to useL
      CONS OF SLACK
      • 13
        Can be distracting depending on how you use it
      • 6
        Requires some management for large teams
      • 6
        Limit messages history
      • 5
        Too expensive
      • 5
        You don't really own your messages
      • 4
        Too many notifications by default

      related Slack posts

      Lucas Litton
      Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 24 upvotes · 321.3K views

      Sentry has been essential to our development approach. Nobody likes errors or apps that crash. We use Sentry heavily during Node.js and React development. Our developers are able to see error reports, crashes, user's browsers, and more, all in one place. Sentry also seamlessly integrates with Asana, Slack, and GitHub.

      See more
      Jakub Olan
      Node.js Software Engineer · | 17 upvotes · 446K views

      Last time we shared there information about our decision about using YouTrack over Jira actually we found much better solution that our team have loved. Linear is a minimalistic issue tracker that integrates well with Sentry, GitHub, Slack and Figma which are our basic tools. I would like to recommend checking out Linear as a potential alternative to "heavy" issue trackers, maybe at enterprises that may not work but when we're a startup that works awesome!

      See more
      Jira logo

      Jira

      61.5K
      1.2K
      The #1 software development tool used by agile teams to plan, track, and release great software.
      61.5K
      1.2K
      PROS OF JIRA
      • 310
        Powerful
      • 254
        Flexible
      • 149
        Easy separation of projects
      • 113
        Run in the cloud
      • 105
        Code integration
      • 58
        Easy to use
      • 53
        Run on your own
      • 39
        Great customization
      • 39
        Easy Workflow Configuration
      • 27
        REST API
      • 12
        Great Agile Management tool
      • 7
        Integrates with virtually everything
      • 6
        Confluence
      • 6
        Complicated
      • 3
        Sentry Issues Integration
      • 2
        It's awesome
      CONS OF JIRA
      • 8
        Rather expensive
      • 5
        Large memory requirement
      • 2
        Slow
      • 1
        Cloud or Datacenter only

      related Jira posts

      Johnny Bell

      So I am a huge fan of JIRA like #massive I used it for many many years, and really loved it, used it personally and at work. I would suggest every new workplace that I worked at to switch to JIRA instead of what I was using.

      When I started at #StackShare we were using a Trello #Kanban board and I was so shocked at how easy the workflow was to follow, create new tasks and get tasks QA'd and deployed. What was so great about this was it didn't come with all the complexity of JIRA. Like setting up a project, user rules etc. You are able to hit the ground running with Trello and get tasks started right away without being overwhelmed with the complexity of options in JIRA

      With a few TrelloPowerUps we were easily able to add GitHub integration and storyPoints to our cards and thats all we needed to get a really nice agile workflow going.

      I'm not saying that JIRA is not useful, I can see larger companies being able to use the JIRA features and have the time to go through all the complex setup to get a really good workflow going. But for smaller #Startups that want to hit the ground running Trello for me is the way to go.

      In saying that what I would love Trello to implement is to allow me to create custom fields. Right now we just have a Description field. So I am adding User Stories & How To Test in the Markdown of the Description if I could have these as custom fields then my #Agile workflow would be complete.

      #StackDecisionsLaunch

      See more
      Jakub Olan
      Node.js Software Engineer · | 17 upvotes · 446K views

      Last time we shared there information about our decision about using YouTrack over Jira actually we found much better solution that our team have loved. Linear is a minimalistic issue tracker that integrates well with Sentry, GitHub, Slack and Figma which are our basic tools. I would like to recommend checking out Linear as a potential alternative to "heavy" issue trackers, maybe at enterprises that may not work but when we're a startup that works awesome!

      See more
      Trello logo

      Trello

      43.1K
      3.7K
      Your entire project, in a single glance
      43.1K
      3.7K
      PROS OF TRELLO
      • 715
        Great for collaboration
      • 628
        Easy to use
      • 573
        Free
      • 375
        Fast
      • 347
        Realtime
      • 237
        Intuitive
      • 215
        Visualizing
      • 169
        Flexible
      • 126
        Fun user interface
      • 83
        Snappy and blazing fast
      • 30
        Simple, intuitive UI that gets out of your way
      • 27
        Kanban
      • 21
        Clean Interface
      • 18
        Easy setup
      • 18
        Card Structure
      • 17
        Drag and drop attachments
      • 11
        Simple
      • 10
        Markdown commentary on cards
      • 9
        Lists
      • 9
        Integration with other work collaborative apps
      • 8
        Satisfying User Experience
      • 8
        Cross-Platform Integration
      • 7
        Recognizes GitHub commit links
      • 6
        Easy to learn
      • 5
        Great
      • 4
        Better than email
      • 4
        Versatile Team & Project Management
      • 3
        and lots of integrations
      • 3
        Trello’s Developmental Transparency
      • 3
        Effective
      • 2
        Easy
      • 2
        Powerful
      • 2
        Agile
      • 2
        Easy to have an overview of the project status
      • 2
        flexible and fast
      • 2
        Simple and intuitive
      • 1
        Name rolls of the tongue
      • 1
        Customizable
      • 1
        Email integration
      • 1
        Personal organisation
      • 1
        Nice
      • 1
        Great organizing (of events/tasks)
      • 0
        Easiest way to visually express the scope of projects
      CONS OF TRELLO
      • 5
        No concept of velocity or points
      • 4
        Very light native integrations
      • 2
        A little too flexible

      related Trello posts

      Johnny Bell

      So I am a huge fan of JIRA like #massive I used it for many many years, and really loved it, used it personally and at work. I would suggest every new workplace that I worked at to switch to JIRA instead of what I was using.

      When I started at #StackShare we were using a Trello #Kanban board and I was so shocked at how easy the workflow was to follow, create new tasks and get tasks QA'd and deployed. What was so great about this was it didn't come with all the complexity of JIRA. Like setting up a project, user rules etc. You are able to hit the ground running with Trello and get tasks started right away without being overwhelmed with the complexity of options in JIRA

      With a few TrelloPowerUps we were easily able to add GitHub integration and storyPoints to our cards and thats all we needed to get a really nice agile workflow going.

      I'm not saying that JIRA is not useful, I can see larger companies being able to use the JIRA features and have the time to go through all the complex setup to get a really good workflow going. But for smaller #Startups that want to hit the ground running Trello for me is the way to go.

      In saying that what I would love Trello to implement is to allow me to create custom fields. Right now we just have a Description field. So I am adding User Stories & How To Test in the Markdown of the Description if I could have these as custom fields then my #Agile workflow would be complete.

      #StackDecisionsLaunch

      See more
      Francisco Quintero
      Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1.8M views

      For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

      What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

      You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

      We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

      Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

      We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

      An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

      Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

      See more