Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Capybara

619
190
+ 1
15
Wombat

4
15
+ 1
11
Add tool

Capybara vs Wombat: What are the differences?

Introduction

Capybara and Wombat are both popular web scraping and automation tools used in the Ruby programming language. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between them that make each tool unique in its own right. In this article, we will explore six of these differences in detail.

  1. Browser Compatibility: Capybara is primarily designed for use with web applications and relies on drivers such as Selenium and Poltergeist to control browsers. On the other hand, Wombat is a scraping-only library that does not require a browser and can work directly with HTML.

  2. Syntax and Expressiveness: Capybara provides a flexible and expressive DSL (Domain-Specific Language) that allows users to write clear and concise code for interacting with web applications. Wombat, on the other hand, utilizes a more traditional programming approach, where users have more control over the code structure but may need to write more lines of code for the same task.

  3. Support for JavaScript: Capybara has built-in support for executing JavaScript within the browser, which enables interaction with dynamic elements and AJAX requests. Wombat, being a scraping-only library, does not have this capability and cannot handle JavaScript-dependent tasks without additional tools or workarounds.

  4. Parallel Execution: Capybara supports parallel execution of tests, allowing multiple tests to run concurrently and potentially reducing overall execution time. Wombat, being a non-test-focused library, does not have built-in support for parallel execution.

  5. Documentation and Community Support: Capybara has a large and active community, extensive documentation, and numerous online resources available. This makes it easier for beginners to find help and solutions to common problems. Wombat, while still having a community and documentation, may not have the same level of resources and support available.

  6. Popularity and Stability: Capybara is widely used in the Ruby community and has been around for a longer time, making it a more well-established and stable choice. Wombat, while gaining popularity, may not have the same level of maturity and stability as Capybara.

In summary, Capybara and Wombat differ in terms of browser compatibility, syntax and expressiveness, support for JavaScript, parallel execution, documentation and community support, as well as overall popularity and stability. These differences should be carefully considered when choosing between the two tools for web scraping and automation tasks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Capybara
Pros of Wombat
  • 12
    Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps
  • 2
    Synchronous with Rack::Test
  • 1
    Fast with Rack::Test
  • 3
    The versatility of integrations that Wombat offers.
  • 3
    Great e-commerce automation
  • 3
    Keeps my storefront code clean
  • 2
    Completely Customizable

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Capybara
Cons of Wombat
  • 1
    Hard to make reproducible tests when using with browser
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Capybara?

    Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

    What is Wombat?

    Automate your store in no time: Wombat is an ecommerce integration platform that quickly connects your storefront with all your favorite 3rd party services. Comprehensive enough for large ecommerce stores and easy enough for small merchants

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Capybara?
    What companies use Wombat?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Capybara or Wombat.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Capybara?
    What tools integrate with Wombat?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Capybara and Wombat?
      Cucumber
      Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.
      Anaconda
      A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.
      Selenium
      Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
      Quokka
      You send great emails but sometimes it gets lost in a user’s inbox. Quokka shows a retargeting message to those who ignored your message so that they will never miss an important update from you.
      Cypress
      Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
      See all alternatives