Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ClickUp vs Trello: What are the differences?
ClickUp vs Trello Comparison
ClickUp and Trello are both popular project management tools used to improve productivity and collaboration among teams. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.
Pricing Model: ClickUp offers a tiered pricing structure that includes both free and paid plans, providing more options for different budget levels. In contrast, Trello has a freemium model, offering a limited free version with additional features available through paid plans.
Task and Subtask Management: ClickUp allows users to create hierarchical task structures with unlimited hierarchical depth, providing more flexibility for managing complex projects. Trello, on the other hand, uses a card-based system where tasks can only have one level, limiting the ability to manage subtasks in a structured manner.
Customization and Templates: ClickUp provides extensive customization options, allowing users to create custom fields, statuses, and workflows to fit their specific project needs. Trello, while offering some customization features, has more limited options compared to ClickUp. Additionally, ClickUp offers pre-built templates that can be used to quickly set up projects, while Trello lacks this feature.
Workflow Automation: ClickUp offers a robust automation feature called "ClickUp Automations," which allows users to automate repetitive tasks and create custom workflows. Trello has limited automation options and relies more on third-party integrations for automation capabilities.
Time Tracking: ClickUp includes built-in time tracking functionality, allowing users to track the time spent on tasks and projects. Trello does not have native time tracking but offers integrations with third-party time-tracking tools.
Integrations: ClickUp integrates with a wide range of third-party applications, including popular tools like Slack, Google Drive, and GitHub. Trello also supports integrations but has a smaller selection compared to ClickUp.
In summary, ClickUp offers a more robust feature set, including advanced customization options, hierarchical task management, and automation features. Trello, on the other hand, is simpler and more streamlined, making it a good choice for users looking for a straightforward project management tool.
I'm comparing Aha!, Trello and Asana. We are looking for it as a Product Management Team. Jira handles all our development and storyboard etc. This is for Product Management for Roadmaps, Backlogs, future stories, etc. Cost is a factor, as well. Does anyone have a comparison chart of Pros and Cons? Thank you.
I just switched to ClickUp for my development agency - I am the product team, and I relay everything there betwixt designers, devs, and clients.
Clickup = Jira + Confluence but better - more ways to slice and dice your data & documents, make custom views, mind map relationships, and track people's work, plan goals... I even use it to manage project finances and household to-dos.
They have a very comprehensive free tier that never expires, and on top of that they're extremely generous with trials of their paid features, have more-than-fair pricing, and top-notch customer support.
A rapidly growing start-up in the biotech field. Main requirements not limited to, but include - cloud sharing, interacting through comments and messages, being able to specify deadlines, estimated time interval, time-lapsed/remaining, assign multiple tasks (task dependencies), and label their priority level, and have integration with a nice group of tools/apps (google and so on).
Basecamp is a great product for remote teams. It is a mindset. If you're looking for a standard project management tool with lots of features, ClickUp is a great choice. It's a bit slow (especially mobile), but in terms of features, it's unbeatable.
A good collaboration tool was always a big challene in the most team I've met. The main challenge is there are many tools with tons of features. They'r all great in the paper. But in practice, the team usually doesn't enjoy collaborating using them. This is the challenging part. The project management tools should be well designed to keep simplicity in combination with well-chosen features to bring the most productivity and activity among the team. I'm thinking about many of my stacks, ClickUp is one of the few choices which I've never thought about migrating about. I can't describe it in text, I just advise you to try it once and you'll understand. The team behind ClickUp is really active. They really care about delivering new features.
You are describing something close to issue tracker like redmine, jira+confluence, youtrack and etc. Redmine is absolutely free, for jira you should pay, youtrack has different licenses.
I have been using this for a while and recommended to my last 15 clients who were amazed by the flexibility of the platform. It has everything You need!
Both Asana and Trello support Kanban style project tracking. Trello is Kanban-only project management, knowledge management, actually card-management tools. Asana is much more complex, supports different project management approaches, well integrated and helpful for any style/type project.
We choose Asana finally, but still some projects kept in Trello
Procezo is an excellent free-for-life task managing tool with several benefits. Its clear, user-friendly interface is perfect for small businesses and startups as well as enterprise-level use. It makes it a seamless transition from any other project management tools. Its simple but effective layout allows new users to quickly adapt to its ever-expanding set of features. Procezo allows users to create boards and provide access to users or teams as required, set priority and precedence of the task and allowing for subtasks and discussions to be created. With unlimited tasks, users, projects and free support, Procezo is quickly making its way into businesses from across the world and the ultimate growth hack tool.
I loved Slack. We used it for discussion. But somehow, it was always difficult to get things done. HeySpace is what replaced Slack and Trello as it combines the functionality of both tools.
So, now we keep on discussing as we did on slack, but once we to a point where we want to do something, we create tasks on a board and distribute them.
trello has a much simpler interface and easy to learn for any team member. asana might have more features and configuration options but do you really need a complex system for developers to manage tasks?
After Microsoft took over trello, it has become more restricted these days but still good for startups.
Keep it simple! Focus on your product, not tools.
Pros of ClickUp
- Overview of several project in one status by folder & L8
- Best PM for a Startup - Hands Down6
- Easily customizable by Business type5
Pros of Trello
- Great for collaboration715
- Easy to use628
- Free573
- Fast375
- Realtime347
- Intuitive237
- Visualizing215
- Flexible169
- Fun user interface126
- Snappy and blazing fast83
- Simple, intuitive UI that gets out of your way30
- Kanban27
- Clean Interface21
- Easy setup18
- Card Structure18
- Drag and drop attachments17
- Simple11
- Markdown commentary on cards10
- Lists9
- Integration with other work collaborative apps9
- Satisfying User Experience8
- Cross-Platform Integration8
- Recognizes GitHub commit links7
- Easy to learn6
- Great5
- Better than email4
- Versatile Team & Project Management4
- and lots of integrations3
- Trello’s Developmental Transparency3
- Effective3
- Easy2
- Powerful2
- Agile2
- Easy to have an overview of the project status2
- flexible and fast2
- Simple and intuitive2
- Name rolls of the tongue1
- Customizable1
- Email integration1
- Personal organisation1
- Nice1
- Great organizing (of events/tasks)1
- Easiest way to visually express the scope of projects0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ClickUp
- Not friendly to use4
- Privacy and Authorities4
- Reporting Issues3
- Useless automation1
Cons of Trello
- No concept of velocity or points5
- Very light native integrations4
- A little too flexible2