Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeCommit

326
819
+ 1
193
SVN (Subversion)

792
619
+ 1
43
Add tool

AWS CodeCommit vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS CodeCommit and SVN (Subversion) are version control systems that help developers manage and track changes to their codebase. While they serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between them.

  1. Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeCommit is fully integrated with AWS, making it seamless to work with other AWS services like AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild. On the other hand, SVN does not offer such deep integration with AWS services, requiring additional configurations and setup.

  2. Scalability and Performance: CodeCommit provides scalability and high performance due to its cloud-based infrastructure. It can handle a large number of concurrent users and repositories with ease. In contrast, SVN may face limitations in scalability and performance, especially when dealing with a massive codebase or multiple teams.

  3. Branching and Merging: CodeCommit offers advanced branching and merging capabilities, allowing developers to create branches, work on them individually, and merge them seamlessly. SVN also supports branching and merging but may require more manual efforts and steps, making it less efficient.

  4. Access Control and Permissions: CodeCommit provides granular access control, allowing administrators to manage user permissions at various levels (repository, branch, file, etc.). SVN also supports access control, but CodeCommit's integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) makes it easier to manage access and permissions in a centralized manner.

  5. Backup and Disaster Recovery: CodeCommit is a managed service provided by AWS, ensuring data backups and disaster recovery measures are in place. SVN, on the other hand, may require additional setup and precautions to ensure proper backup and disaster recovery.

  6. Pricing and Cost Structure: CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the number of active repositories and data transfer. SVN, being an open-source system, does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, deploying SVN on a server and maintaining it may incur infrastructure and maintenance costs.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit offers deep integration with AWS services, scalability, advanced branching and merging capabilities, granular access control, backup and disaster recovery measures, and a pay-as-you-go pricing model. SVN, on the other hand, may require additional configurations, manual efforts for branching and merging, and additional setup for access control and backup.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS CodeCommit
Pros of SVN (Subversion)
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
  • 11
    Faster deployments when using other AWS services
  • 11
    I can make repository by myself if I have AWS account
  • 8
    AWS CodePipeline integration
  • 6
    Codebuild integration
  • 6
    Does not support web hooks yet! :(
  • 4
    Cost Effective
  • 2
    No Git LFS! Dealbreaker for me
  • 2
    Integrated with AWS Ecosystem
  • 2
    Elastic Beanstalk Integration
  • 1
    Integration via SQS/SNS for events (replaces webhooks)
  • 1
    IAM
  • 1
    Open source friendly
  • 1
    Only US Region
  • 1
    Available in Ireland (Dublin) region
  • 1
    CodeDeploy Integration
  • 1
    Issue tracker
  • 1
    CodeCommit Trigger for an AWS Lambda Function
  • 0
    Ui
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Simple code versioning
  • 5
    User/Access Management
  • 3
    Complicated code versionioning by Subversion
  • 2
    Free

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CodeCommit
Cons of SVN (Subversion)
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    Bad diffing/no blame
  • 2
    NO LFS support
  • 2
    No fork
  • 2
    No webhooks
  • 1
    Can't download file from UI
  • 1
    Only time based triggers
  • 0
    Accident-prone UI
  • 7
    Branching and tagging use tons of disk space

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AWS CodeCommit?

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is SVN (Subversion)?

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention AWS CodeCommit and SVN (Subversion) as a desired skillset
What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
What companies use SVN (Subversion)?
See which teams inside your own company are using AWS CodeCommit or SVN (Subversion).
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
What tools integrate with SVN (Subversion)?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit and SVN (Subversion)?
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Bitbucket
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
See all alternatives