Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
SignalR vs Supabase: What are the differences?
SignalR: A new library for ASP.NET developers that makes developing real-time web functionality easy. SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization; Supabase: The open source Firebase alternative. Supabase is currently in early-Alpha .It is an open-source Firebase alternative. It adds realtime and RESTful APIs to your PostgreSQL database without a single line of code.
SignalR and Supabase can be primarily classified as "Realtime Backend / API" tools.
SignalR is an open source tool with 8.06K GitHub stars and 2.23K GitHub forks. Here's a link to SignalR's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of SignalR
- Supports .NET server32
- Real-time25
- Free18
- Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling16
- WebSockets15
- Simple10
- Open source9
- Ease of use8
- JSON8
- Cool5
- Azure0
Pros of Supabase
- Relational Database6
- Self hosting5
- Free3
- Open source2
- Postgres hosting2
- Easy deployment2
- Focus on product, not on deployment1
- Faster development1
- Realtime1
- Huge time-saver1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of SignalR
- Expertise hard to get2
- Requires jQuery2
- Weak iOS and Android support1
- Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions1
Cons of Supabase
- No cons0