Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Harbor

171
182
+ 1
11
Rancher

944
1.5K
+ 1
644
Add tool

Harbor vs Rancher: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of container orchestration and management, both Harbor and Rancher are popular choices. While both aim to simplify the process of deploying and managing containers, there are some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture: Harbor is primarily focused on container image registry and distribution, allowing organizations to store, sign, and share their container images. It provides a secure and scalable platform for managing container images. Rancher, on the other hand, is a comprehensive container management platform that supports multiple orchestration frameworks like Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Mesos. It provides a central dashboard to manage and deploy containers across different clusters.

  2. Use Cases: Harbor is particularly advantageous for organizations that need a private, on-premises container registry to ensure security and compliance. It offers features like vulnerability scanning, access control, and replication to support the needs of enterprise environments. Rancher, on the other hand, is suitable for organizations looking for a complete container management solution. It offers features like infrastructure provisioning, workload deployments, monitoring, and scaling for different orchestration frameworks, making it a versatile option for managing containers across various environments.

  3. Community Support: While both Harbor and Rancher have active communities and offer enterprise-grade support, Rancher has a larger and more vibrant community compared to Harbor. This is partly due to Rancher's wider scope and support for multiple orchestration frameworks. A larger community can bring benefits like more extensive documentation, a wider range of available plugins, and a stronger ecosystem.

  4. Integration: Harbor integrates nicely with other container management tools and solutions, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows. It can be seamlessly integrated with popular container orchestration frameworks like Kubernetes, enabling efficient image distribution across clusters. Rancher, being a comprehensive container management platform, offers extensive integration capabilities as well. It integrates with various infrastructure providers, load balancers, monitoring tools, and authentication services, providing a flexible and interconnected ecosystem for container management.

  5. Ease of Use: Harbor has a relatively straightforward and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to perform container image-related tasks like pushing, pulling, and scanning images. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use, even for users with limited experience in container management. Rancher, on the other hand, has a more complex user interface due to its wider range of features and functionalities. While it provides a comprehensive set of tools for managing containers, it may require some level of expertise to fully utilize all its capabilities.

  6. Extensibility: Harbor offers a high level of extensibility through a plugin system. Users can develop custom plugins or leverage existing ones to extend its functionality and integrate with other systems. It allows organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs and integrate it into their existing toolchains. Rancher also supports extensibility through its extensive API and plugin ecosystem. It provides an open platform that allows developers to build and share custom integrations, extending Rancher's capabilities to meet specific requirements.

In Summary, while both Harbor and Rancher serve the purpose of container management, Harbor focuses more on container image registry and distribution, whereas Rancher offers a broader container management platform supporting multiple orchestration frameworks, making it suitable for organizations looking for comprehensive container management features. Harbor is ideal for businesses in need of a private on-premises container registry, while Rancher's larger community support and wider integration capabilities make it versatile for managing containers across different environments.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Harbor
Pros of Rancher
  • 4
    Good on-premises container registry
  • 1
    Container Replication
  • 1
    Nice UI
  • 1
    Vulnerability Scanner
  • 1
    Supports LDAP/Active Directory
  • 1
    Supports OIDC
  • 1
    Support multiple authentication methods
  • 1
    Perfect for Teams and Organizations
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
  • 44
    Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature
  • 42
    Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box
  • 37
    Only requires docker
  • 34
    Multitenant and permission management
  • 29
    Easy to use and feature rich
  • 11
    Cross cloud compatible
  • 11
    Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure
  • 8
    Simple and powerful
  • 8
    Next-gen platform
  • 7
    Very Docker-friendly
  • 6
    Support Kubernetes and Swarm
  • 6
    Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)
  • 6
    Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes
  • 6
    Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments
  • 6
    High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/7
  • 5
    Easy to use service catalog
  • 4
    Very intuitive UI
  • 4
    IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud
  • 4
    Awesome support
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Requires less infrastructure requirements

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Harbor
Cons of Rancher
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 10
      Hosting Rancher can be complicated

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Harbor?

    Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

    What is Rancher?

    Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Harbor?
    What companies use Rancher?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Harbor or Rancher.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Harbor?
    What tools integrate with Rancher?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1102
    May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
    5
    1496
    Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesRancher+2
    2
    937
    What are some alternatives to Harbor and Rancher?
    Grizzly
    Writing scalable server applications in the Java™ programming language has always been difficult. Before its advent, thread management issues made it impossible for a server to scale to thousands of users. This framework has been designed to help developers to take advantage of the Java™ NIO API.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Docker Compose
    With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
    Docker Swarm
    Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
    Argo
    Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).
    See all alternatives