Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
PyQt vs Qt: What are the differences?
PyQt is a Python binding for the Qt library, enabling Python developers to use Qt's features, while Qt supports multiple languages like C++, JavaScript, and Python. Let's explore them.
Language Compatibility: PyQt is a Python binding for the Qt library, allowing the use of Qt in the Python language, while Qt is a framework that supports multiple programming languages such as C++, JavaScript, and Python. PyQt provides an interface for Python developers to access and use the comprehensive features of Qt.
Development Process: When using PyQt, developers can use Python's object-oriented programming paradigm and take advantage of Python's simplicity and ease of use in the development process. On the other hand, Qt allows developers to use various programming languages with its own framework-specific syntax. PyQt emphasizes flexibility and rapid development, while Qt provides a more comprehensive and versatile development environment.
Learning Curve: While PyQt offers a more streamlined and Pythonic way of programming, Qt has a steeper learning curve due to its wide range of features and syntax. PyQt simplifies the development process by leveraging Python's simplicity, making it easier for Python developers to learn and use the Qt framework. Qt requires developers to learn its specific syntax and concepts, which may take more time and effort for those unfamiliar with the framework.
Platform Support: PyQt provides cross-platform support, allowing developers to create applications that can run on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. Qt, being a versatile framework, also supports multiple platforms, making it suitable for developing applications that can run on desktop, mobile, and embedded systems. Both PyQt and Qt offer extensive platform compatibility, enabling developers to target a wide range of devices and platforms with their applications.
License Restrictions: PyQt is available under the GNU General Public License (GPL) or a commercial license, giving developers the option to choose which license suits their needs. Qt, on the other hand, has dual licensing options. It is available under both an open-source license and a commercial license. Developers using Qt for open-source projects can do so under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), while commercial use requires a commercial license. This difference in licensing options provides developers with more choices and flexibility when deciding how to distribute their applications.
Community and Support: PyQt has a lively and active community of developers, with various online resources and forums available for support and guidance. Qt, being a widely used and established framework, also has a large community of developers. Both PyQt and Qt have extensive documentation and support available, ensuring that developers can access information and assistance when faced with technical challenges or queries.
In summary, PyQt provides a Pythonic way of using the Qt framework, simplifying the development process and allowing Python developers to leverage the extensive features of Qt.
Pros of PyQt
Pros of Qt
- High Performance17
- Declarative, easy and flexible UI13
- Cross platform12
- Performance12
- Fast prototyping9
- Easiest integration with C++8
- Up to date framework8
- Python7
- Multiple license including Open Source and Commercial6
- Safe 2D Renderer6
- Great Community Support5
- HW Accelerated UI4
- Game Engine like UI system4
- No history of broken compatibility with a major version3
- JIT and QML Compiler3
- True cross-platform framework with native code compile3
- Reliable for industrial use3
- Pure C++3
- Been using it since the 90s - runs anywhere does it all3
- Open source2
- Easy Integrating to DX and OpenGL and Vulkan2
- From high to low level coding2
- Learning Curve1
- Great mobile support with Felgo add-on1
- Native looking GUI1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of PyQt
Cons of Qt
- Paid5
- C++ is not so productive4
- Lack of community support2
- Lack of libraries1
- Not detailed documentation1