Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
NGINX Amplify vs Prometheus: What are the differences?
## Introduction
NGINX Amplify and Prometheus are both monitoring tools commonly used in the industry to gather metrics, analyze them, and generate insights to help organizations optimize their systems and applications.
1. **Data Collection**: NGINX Amplify primarily focuses on monitoring NGINX servers and applications running on NGINX, providing detailed metrics and insights specifically for the NGINX ecosystem. On the other hand, Prometheus is a more general-purpose monitoring tool that supports a wide range of systems and applications beyond just NGINX, making it a versatile choice for overall system monitoring.
2. **Data Visualization**: NGINX Amplify offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard that presents metrics and insights in a visually appealing manner. In contrast, Prometheus provides a robust query language and powerful visualization capabilities through tools like Grafana, offering more flexibility and customization options for data visualization.
3. **Alerting System**: NGINX Amplify includes a simple alerting system that allows users to set up alerts based on predefined triggers and thresholds. Prometheus, on the other hand, offers a highly configurable alerting system that supports complex alerting rules, custom notifications, and integration with external services for more advanced alerting capabilities.
4. **Ease of Deployment**: NGINX Amplify is designed for quick and easy deployment, with a lightweight agent that can be set up within minutes to start collecting metrics from NGINX servers. Prometheus, while more versatile, requires more effort for deployment and configuration due to its decentralized architecture and specific data format requirements.
5. **Community Support**: Prometheus has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, support resources, and a rich ecosystem of plugins and integrations. NGINX Amplify, being a more specialized tool, may have a smaller community in comparison, but benefits from dedicated support and resources focused specifically on NGINX monitoring.
6. **Cost**: NGINX Amplify offers a freemium model with a free tier that includes basic monitoring features, while additional premium features are available with a paid subscription. Prometheus, being open-source software, is free to use and can be implemented cost-effectively, with potential costs mainly associated with maintenance and support services.
In Summary, NGINX Amplify is tailored for NGINX monitoring with a user-friendly interface and simpler setup, whereas Prometheus is a versatile tool supporting diverse systems, offering advanced customization, and being cost-effective due to its open-source nature.
Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:
- Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
- Able to display automation test results,
- System monitoring / Nginx API,
- Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.
Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.
You can look out for Prometheus Instrumentation (https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/instrumentation/) Client Library available in various languages https://prometheus.io/docs/instrumenting/clientlibs/ to create the custom metric you need for AS4000 and then Grafana can query the newly instrumented metric to show on the dashboard.
Hi, We have a situation, where we are using Prometheus to get system metrics from PCF (Pivotal Cloud Foundry) platform. We send that as time-series data to Cortex via a Prometheus server and built a dashboard using Grafana. There is another pipeline where we need to read metrics from a Linux server using Metricbeat, CPU, memory, and Disk. That will be sent to Elasticsearch and Grafana will pull and show the data in a dashboard.
Is it OK to use Metricbeat for Linux server or can we use Prometheus?
What is the difference in system metrics sent by Metricbeat and Prometheus node exporters?
Regards, Sunil.
If you're already using Prometheus for your system metrics, then it seems like standing up Elasticsearch just for Linux host monitoring is excessive. The node_exporter is probably sufficient if you'e looking for standard system metrics.
Another thing to consider is that Metricbeat / ELK use a push model for metrics delivery, whereas Prometheus pulls metrics from each node it is monitoring. Depending on how you manage your network security, opting for one solution over two may make things simpler.
Hi Sunil! Unfortunately, I don´t have much experience with Metricbeat so I can´t advise on the diffs with Prometheus...for Linux server, I encourage you to use Prometheus node exporter and for PCF, I would recommend using the instana tile (https://www.instana.com/supported-technologies/pivotal-cloud-foundry/). Let me know if you have further questions! Regards Jose
We're looking for a Monitoring and Logging tool. It has to support AWS (mostly 100% serverless, Lambdas, SNS, SQS, API GW, CloudFront, Autora, etc.), as well as Azure and GCP (for now mostly used as pure IaaS, with a lot of cognitive services, and mostly managed DB). Hopefully, something not as expensive as Datadog or New relic, as our SRE team could support the tool inhouse. At the moment, we primarily use CloudWatch for AWS and Pandora for most on-prem.
this is quite affordable and provides what you seem to be looking for. you can see a whole thing about the APM space here https://www.apmexperts.com/observability/ranking-the-observability-offerings/
I worked with Datadog at least one year and my position is that commercial tools like Datadog are the best option to consolidate and analyze your metrics. Obviously, if you can't pay the tool, the best free options are the mix of Prometheus with their Alert Manager and Grafana to visualize (that are complementary not substitutable). But I think that no use a good tool it's finally more expensive that use a not really good implementation of free tools and you will pay also to maintain its.
The objective of this work was to develop a system to monitor the materials of a production line using IoT technology. Currently, the process of monitoring and replacing parts depends on manual services. For this, load cells, microcontroller, Broker MQTT, Telegraf, InfluxDB, and Grafana were used. It was implemented in a workflow that had the function of collecting sensor data, storing it in a database, and visualizing it in the form of weight and quantity. With these developed solutions, he hopes to contribute to the logistics area, in the replacement and control of materials.
Pros of NGINX Amplify
Pros of Prometheus
- Powerful easy to use monitoring47
- Flexible query language38
- Dimensional data model32
- Alerts27
- Active and responsive community23
- Extensive integrations22
- Easy to setup19
- Beautiful Model and Query language12
- Easy to extend7
- Nice6
- Written in Go3
- Good for experimentation2
- Easy for monitoring1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NGINX Amplify
Cons of Prometheus
- Just for metrics12
- Bad UI6
- Needs monitoring to access metrics endpoints6
- Not easy to configure and use4
- Supports only active agents3
- Written in Go2
- TLS is quite difficult to understand2
- Requires multiple applications and tools2
- Single point of failure1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is NGINX Amplify?
What is Prometheus?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use NGINX Amplify?
What companies use Prometheus?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Prometheus?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+11
+12
+14
+6+26